护士和其他卫生保健工作者在不同职业环境中的流感疫苗接种:一种经典和人工智能混合方法的时间事件数据。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Matteo Ratti, Riccardo Rescinito, Domenico Gigante, Alberto Lontano, Massimiliano Panella
{"title":"护士和其他卫生保健工作者在不同职业环境中的流感疫苗接种:一种经典和人工智能混合方法的时间事件数据。","authors":"Matteo Ratti, Riccardo Rescinito, Domenico Gigante, Alberto Lontano, Massimiliano Panella","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15030087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Seasonal influenza currently remains a major public health concern for the community and, in particular, the health care worker (HCW). According to the World Health Organization, HCWs are among the high-risk categories for which vaccination is recommended, due to the derived absenteeism, productivity loss, and high probability of transmitting the disease to vulnerable individuals or patients. Therefore, an HCW vaccination policy should be adopted by every health care provider. There is growing evidence that a time effect of the vaccination event is probable, which may influence vaccine effectiveness. We designed and conducted an observational study to investigate the time to anti-influenza vaccination event of different categories of HCWs belonging to different occupational settings in a tertiary hospital during three seasons in order to retrieve some insight about HCW prioritization when designing vaccination campaigns. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the results of two HCW anti-influenza vaccination campaigns (2022 and 2023) to assess any difference regarding job typology and unit typology (critical care, surgical, medical, service). We first fitted a classic Cox proportional hazard model and then an AI random forest model to assess variable importance. We used R, RStudio, and the survex package. <b>Results:</b> Overall, other HCWs reported a lower vaccination rate compared to nurses (HR 0.77; 95%CI 0.62-0.97), and service unit personnel appeared to more likely be vaccinated (HR 1.42; 95%CI 1.01-1.99) compared to those belonging to the critical care units. As expected, older workers tended to be vaccinated more frequently (HR 1.70 for the (46, 65] category compared to the younger one; 95%CI 1.39-2.09). The variable importance analysis showed consistent superiority of the ward typology and age category variables with respect to time. During the entire timeline, the ward typology appeared to be more important than the HCW typology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest a prioritization policy based firstly on the unit typology followed by the job typology for HCW anti-influenza campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influenza Vaccination of Nurses and Other Health Care Workers in Different Occupational Settings: A Classic and AI Mixed Approach for Time-to-Event Data.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Ratti, Riccardo Rescinito, Domenico Gigante, Alberto Lontano, Massimiliano Panella\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15030087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Seasonal influenza currently remains a major public health concern for the community and, in particular, the health care worker (HCW). According to the World Health Organization, HCWs are among the high-risk categories for which vaccination is recommended, due to the derived absenteeism, productivity loss, and high probability of transmitting the disease to vulnerable individuals or patients. Therefore, an HCW vaccination policy should be adopted by every health care provider. There is growing evidence that a time effect of the vaccination event is probable, which may influence vaccine effectiveness. We designed and conducted an observational study to investigate the time to anti-influenza vaccination event of different categories of HCWs belonging to different occupational settings in a tertiary hospital during three seasons in order to retrieve some insight about HCW prioritization when designing vaccination campaigns. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the results of two HCW anti-influenza vaccination campaigns (2022 and 2023) to assess any difference regarding job typology and unit typology (critical care, surgical, medical, service). We first fitted a classic Cox proportional hazard model and then an AI random forest model to assess variable importance. We used R, RStudio, and the survex package. <b>Results:</b> Overall, other HCWs reported a lower vaccination rate compared to nurses (HR 0.77; 95%CI 0.62-0.97), and service unit personnel appeared to more likely be vaccinated (HR 1.42; 95%CI 1.01-1.99) compared to those belonging to the critical care units. As expected, older workers tended to be vaccinated more frequently (HR 1.70 for the (46, 65] category compared to the younger one; 95%CI 1.39-2.09). The variable importance analysis showed consistent superiority of the ward typology and age category variables with respect to time. During the entire timeline, the ward typology appeared to be more important than the HCW typology. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest a prioritization policy based firstly on the unit typology followed by the job typology for HCW anti-influenza campaigns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944323/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15030087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:季节性流感目前仍然是社区,特别是卫生保健工作者(HCW)关注的主要公共卫生问题。根据世界卫生组织的资料,卫生保健工作者属于建议接种疫苗的高风险类别,因为由此产生的缺勤、生产力损失以及将疾病传播给脆弱个人或患者的可能性很大。因此,每个卫生保健提供者都应采用丙型肝炎疫苗接种政策。越来越多的证据表明,疫苗接种事件可能存在时间效应,这可能影响疫苗的有效性。我们设计并开展了一项观察性研究,调查三级医院不同职业环境的不同类别卫生保健工作者在三个季节进行抗流感疫苗接种的时间,以便在设计疫苗接种活动时获得卫生保健工作优先级的一些见解。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了两次HCW抗流感疫苗接种活动(2022年和2023年)的结果,以评估工作类型和单位类型(重症监护、外科、医疗、服务)的差异。我们首先拟合了一个经典的Cox比例风险模型,然后是一个人工智能随机森林模型来评估变量的重要性。我们使用了R语言、RStudio和survex软件包。结果:总体而言,其他医护人员报告的接种率低于护士(HR 0.77;95%可信区间为0.62-0.97),服务单位人员似乎更有可能接种疫苗(HR 1.42;95%CI 1.01-1.99),与那些属于重症监护病房的患者相比。正如预期的那样,年龄较大的工人往往更频繁地接种疫苗([46,65]类别的HR为1.70);95%可信区间1.39 - -2.09)。变量重要性分析显示病房类型和年龄类别变量相对于时间具有一致的优势。在整个时间轴上,病房类型似乎比HCW类型更重要。结论:我们的研究结果表明,HCW抗流感运动的优先级政策首先基于单位类型,其次是工作类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influenza Vaccination of Nurses and Other Health Care Workers in Different Occupational Settings: A Classic and AI Mixed Approach for Time-to-Event Data.

Background: Seasonal influenza currently remains a major public health concern for the community and, in particular, the health care worker (HCW). According to the World Health Organization, HCWs are among the high-risk categories for which vaccination is recommended, due to the derived absenteeism, productivity loss, and high probability of transmitting the disease to vulnerable individuals or patients. Therefore, an HCW vaccination policy should be adopted by every health care provider. There is growing evidence that a time effect of the vaccination event is probable, which may influence vaccine effectiveness. We designed and conducted an observational study to investigate the time to anti-influenza vaccination event of different categories of HCWs belonging to different occupational settings in a tertiary hospital during three seasons in order to retrieve some insight about HCW prioritization when designing vaccination campaigns. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the results of two HCW anti-influenza vaccination campaigns (2022 and 2023) to assess any difference regarding job typology and unit typology (critical care, surgical, medical, service). We first fitted a classic Cox proportional hazard model and then an AI random forest model to assess variable importance. We used R, RStudio, and the survex package. Results: Overall, other HCWs reported a lower vaccination rate compared to nurses (HR 0.77; 95%CI 0.62-0.97), and service unit personnel appeared to more likely be vaccinated (HR 1.42; 95%CI 1.01-1.99) compared to those belonging to the critical care units. As expected, older workers tended to be vaccinated more frequently (HR 1.70 for the (46, 65] category compared to the younger one; 95%CI 1.39-2.09). The variable importance analysis showed consistent superiority of the ward typology and age category variables with respect to time. During the entire timeline, the ward typology appeared to be more important than the HCW typology. Conclusions: Our results suggest a prioritization policy based firstly on the unit typology followed by the job typology for HCW anti-influenza campaigns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信