{"title":"原花青素和EDTA增强异构体和Cention N与人牙本质剪切结合强度的比较:体外研究。","authors":"Shobana Shetty, Namith Rai, Kushal Shetty, Arun Mayya, Akshatha Chatra, Preethish Shetty","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_178_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Achieving durable bonding to dentin remains a challenge in restorative dentistry due to its complex structure and composition. Conditioning agents, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and proanthocyanidins (PACs), are used to modify the smear layer and enhance adhesion. PACs have shown promise in improving bond strength through collagen cross-linking. This <i>in vitro</i> study compared the effects of 17% EDTA and PAC conditioning on the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to human dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty extracted human premolars and molars were randomly divided into three conditioning groups (<i>n</i> = 20 per group): 17% EDTA (MD-Cleanser, Meta Biomed Co. Ltd., Cheongju, Korea), 6.5% PAC solution, and an intact smear layer (control). Each conditioning group was further subdivided (<i>n</i> = 10 per subgroup) based on the restorative material: Giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and Cention N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PAC conditioning resulted in the highest mean shear bond strength (5.34 ± 1.93 MPa), significantly higher than the intact smear layer (3.77 ± 1.74 MPa; mean difference = 1.57 MPa, <i>P</i> = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between PAC and 17% EDTA (4.55 ± 1.64 MPa). Giomer (5.33 ± 1.86 MPa) exhibited significantly greater shear bond strength than Cention N (3.78 ± 1.52 MPa; mean difference = 1.55 MPa, <i>P</i> < 0.001) across all conditioning methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAC conditioning significantly improved the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to dentin compared to the intact smear layer. Giomer demonstrated superior bond strength compared to Cention N regardless of the conditioning agent used. These findings suggest that PAC may be a promising dentin conditioning agent for enhancing the durability of bonded restorations. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these <i>in vitro</i> findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"15 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Proanthocyanidin and EDTA in Enhancing Shear Bond Strength of Giomer and Cention N to Human Dentin: An <i>In vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shobana Shetty, Namith Rai, Kushal Shetty, Arun Mayya, Akshatha Chatra, Preethish Shetty\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_178_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Achieving durable bonding to dentin remains a challenge in restorative dentistry due to its complex structure and composition. Conditioning agents, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and proanthocyanidins (PACs), are used to modify the smear layer and enhance adhesion. PACs have shown promise in improving bond strength through collagen cross-linking. This <i>in vitro</i> study compared the effects of 17% EDTA and PAC conditioning on the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to human dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty extracted human premolars and molars were randomly divided into three conditioning groups (<i>n</i> = 20 per group): 17% EDTA (MD-Cleanser, Meta Biomed Co. Ltd., Cheongju, Korea), 6.5% PAC solution, and an intact smear layer (control). Each conditioning group was further subdivided (<i>n</i> = 10 per subgroup) based on the restorative material: Giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and Cention N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PAC conditioning resulted in the highest mean shear bond strength (5.34 ± 1.93 MPa), significantly higher than the intact smear layer (3.77 ± 1.74 MPa; mean difference = 1.57 MPa, <i>P</i> = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between PAC and 17% EDTA (4.55 ± 1.64 MPa). Giomer (5.33 ± 1.86 MPa) exhibited significantly greater shear bond strength than Cention N (3.78 ± 1.52 MPa; mean difference = 1.55 MPa, <i>P</i> < 0.001) across all conditioning methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAC conditioning significantly improved the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to dentin compared to the intact smear layer. Giomer demonstrated superior bond strength compared to Cention N regardless of the conditioning agent used. These findings suggest that PAC may be a promising dentin conditioning agent for enhancing the durability of bonded restorations. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these <i>in vitro</i> findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"61-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_178_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_178_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:由于牙本质复杂的结构和组成,实现牙本质与牙本质的持久结合一直是修复牙科的挑战。调理剂,如乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和原花青素(PACs),用于修饰涂抹层和增强附着力。pac已显示出通过胶原交联提高粘合强度的希望。本实验比较了17% EDTA和PAC处理对聚乙二醇聚乙二醇(Giomer)和Cention N与人牙本质剪切结合强度的影响。材料与方法:将60颗拔除的人前磨牙和磨牙随机分为3个调理组(每组20颗):17% EDTA (MD-Cleanser, Meta Biomed Co. Ltd, Cheongju, Korea)、6.5% PAC溶液和完整涂抹层(对照)。根据修复材料将每个修复组进一步细分(每个亚组n = 10): Giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu Inc.,京都,日本)和Cention n (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan,列支敦士登)。剪切粘接强度采用Instron万能试验机,十字速度为0.5 mm/min。数据分析采用双因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验。结果:PAC处理后的平均剪切结合强度最高(5.34±1.93 MPa),显著高于完整涂片层(3.77±1.74 MPa);平均差值= 1.57 MPa, P = 0.008)。PAC与17% EDTA(4.55±1.64 MPa)无统计学差异。Giomer(5.33±1.86 MPa)的剪切强度显著高于Cention N(3.78±1.52 MPa);平均差值= 1.55 MPa, P < 0.001)。结论:与完整涂片层相比,PAC处理明显提高了Giomer和Cention N与牙本质的剪切结合强度。与Cention N相比,无论使用何种调理剂,聚乙二醇都表现出优越的粘合强度。这些结果表明,PAC可能是一种有前途的牙本质调理剂,可以提高粘接修复体的耐久性。需要进一步的临床研究来验证这些体外研究结果。
Comparison of Proanthocyanidin and EDTA in Enhancing Shear Bond Strength of Giomer and Cention N to Human Dentin: An In vitro Study.
Aim: Achieving durable bonding to dentin remains a challenge in restorative dentistry due to its complex structure and composition. Conditioning agents, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and proanthocyanidins (PACs), are used to modify the smear layer and enhance adhesion. PACs have shown promise in improving bond strength through collagen cross-linking. This in vitro study compared the effects of 17% EDTA and PAC conditioning on the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to human dentin.
Materials and methods: Sixty extracted human premolars and molars were randomly divided into three conditioning groups (n = 20 per group): 17% EDTA (MD-Cleanser, Meta Biomed Co. Ltd., Cheongju, Korea), 6.5% PAC solution, and an intact smear layer (control). Each conditioning group was further subdivided (n = 10 per subgroup) based on the restorative material: Giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and Cention N (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.
Results: PAC conditioning resulted in the highest mean shear bond strength (5.34 ± 1.93 MPa), significantly higher than the intact smear layer (3.77 ± 1.74 MPa; mean difference = 1.57 MPa, P = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between PAC and 17% EDTA (4.55 ± 1.64 MPa). Giomer (5.33 ± 1.86 MPa) exhibited significantly greater shear bond strength than Cention N (3.78 ± 1.52 MPa; mean difference = 1.55 MPa, P < 0.001) across all conditioning methods.
Conclusion: PAC conditioning significantly improved the shear bond strength of Giomer and Cention N to dentin compared to the intact smear layer. Giomer demonstrated superior bond strength compared to Cention N regardless of the conditioning agent used. These findings suggest that PAC may be a promising dentin conditioning agent for enhancing the durability of bonded restorations. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these in vitro findings.
期刊介绍:
It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.