Michael J Hughes, Madeleine M Stoddart, Gernot Horstmann, Ottmar V Lipp, Stefanie I Becker
{"title":"参与者的情绪调节注意力和眼球运动,在视觉上寻找有情绪的面孔。","authors":"Michael J Hughes, Madeleine M Stoddart, Gernot Horstmann, Ottmar V Lipp, Stefanie I Becker","doi":"10.1037/emo0001509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on visual search for emotional faces has yielded discrepant results, with some studies reporting advantages for angry faces (anger superiority effect) and others reporting a happy face advantage (happiness superiority effect). Researchers have sought to explain these phenomena through an <i>emotional factors account</i>: attributing the anger superiority effect to an innate threat detector, and the happiness superiority effect to a positivity bias that gives preference to positive stimuli. The alternative <i>perceptual factors account</i> proposes that salient perceptual features inherent to angry and happy faces drive these search asymmetries. As emotional and perceptual factors are intrinsically confounded in emotional faces, it has proven difficult to distinguish between the two accounts. In the present experiments, we distinguished between the two accounts by manipulating participant mood across three different conditions (neutral, angry, and happy), and asked participants to locate a variable emotional (angry or happy) target face. Eye-tracking measures revealed a significant <i>mood-congruency effect</i> for search efficiency, where fewer fixations were required to locate a mood-congruent target than a mood-incongruent target. These findings were obtained across two experiments using different face stimuli (dynamic vs. static faces), emotional and neutral nontargets, and different search requirements, indicating that participant mood can influence attention across a wide range of conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1852-1871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participant mood modulates attention and eye movements in visual search for emotional faces.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Hughes, Madeleine M Stoddart, Gernot Horstmann, Ottmar V Lipp, Stefanie I Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/emo0001509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research on visual search for emotional faces has yielded discrepant results, with some studies reporting advantages for angry faces (anger superiority effect) and others reporting a happy face advantage (happiness superiority effect). Researchers have sought to explain these phenomena through an <i>emotional factors account</i>: attributing the anger superiority effect to an innate threat detector, and the happiness superiority effect to a positivity bias that gives preference to positive stimuli. The alternative <i>perceptual factors account</i> proposes that salient perceptual features inherent to angry and happy faces drive these search asymmetries. As emotional and perceptual factors are intrinsically confounded in emotional faces, it has proven difficult to distinguish between the two accounts. In the present experiments, we distinguished between the two accounts by manipulating participant mood across three different conditions (neutral, angry, and happy), and asked participants to locate a variable emotional (angry or happy) target face. Eye-tracking measures revealed a significant <i>mood-congruency effect</i> for search efficiency, where fewer fixations were required to locate a mood-congruent target than a mood-incongruent target. These findings were obtained across two experiments using different face stimuli (dynamic vs. static faces), emotional and neutral nontargets, and different search requirements, indicating that participant mood can influence attention across a wide range of conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1852-1871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对情绪面孔的视觉搜索研究得出了不同的结果,一些研究报告了愤怒面孔的优势(愤怒优势效应),而另一些研究报告了快乐面孔的优势(快乐优势效应)。研究人员试图通过一种情绪因素解释这些现象:将愤怒优势效应归因于天生的威胁探测器,将快乐优势效应归因于偏爱积极刺激的积极偏见。另一种感知因素解释提出,愤怒和快乐面孔固有的显著感知特征驱动了这些搜索不对称。由于情感和感知因素在情感面孔中本质上是混淆的,因此很难区分这两种说法。在目前的实验中,我们通过在三种不同的条件下(中性、愤怒和快乐)操纵参与者的情绪来区分这两种说法,并要求参与者定位一个可变情绪(愤怒或快乐)的目标脸。眼动追踪测试显示了情绪一致性对搜索效率的显著影响,其中定位情绪一致目标所需的注视比定位情绪不一致目标所需的注视更少。这些发现是在两个实验中获得的,实验使用了不同的面部刺激(动态和静态面部),情绪和中性非目标,以及不同的搜索要求,表明参与者的情绪可以在广泛的条件下影响注意力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Participant mood modulates attention and eye movements in visual search for emotional faces.
Research on visual search for emotional faces has yielded discrepant results, with some studies reporting advantages for angry faces (anger superiority effect) and others reporting a happy face advantage (happiness superiority effect). Researchers have sought to explain these phenomena through an emotional factors account: attributing the anger superiority effect to an innate threat detector, and the happiness superiority effect to a positivity bias that gives preference to positive stimuli. The alternative perceptual factors account proposes that salient perceptual features inherent to angry and happy faces drive these search asymmetries. As emotional and perceptual factors are intrinsically confounded in emotional faces, it has proven difficult to distinguish between the two accounts. In the present experiments, we distinguished between the two accounts by manipulating participant mood across three different conditions (neutral, angry, and happy), and asked participants to locate a variable emotional (angry or happy) target face. Eye-tracking measures revealed a significant mood-congruency effect for search efficiency, where fewer fixations were required to locate a mood-congruent target than a mood-incongruent target. These findings were obtained across two experiments using different face stimuli (dynamic vs. static faces), emotional and neutral nontargets, and different search requirements, indicating that participant mood can influence attention across a wide range of conditions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.