视觉输入和运动恐惧症对老年人单腿站立时姿势控制和生活质量的影响。

Q2 Medicine
Paul S Sung, Dongchul Lee
{"title":"视觉输入和运动恐惧症对老年人单腿站立时姿势控制和生活质量的影响。","authors":"Paul S Sung, Dongchul Lee","doi":"10.3390/vision9010024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual conditions significantly influence fear of movement (FOM), which is a condition that impairs postural control and quality of life (QOL). This study examined how visual conditions influence sway velocity during repeated one-leg standing tasks and explored the potential relationship between postural control, FOM, and QOL in older adults with and without FOM. Thirty-seven older adults with FOM and 37 controls participated in the study. Postural sway velocity was measured across three repeated trials under visual conditions in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. The groups demonstrated significant interaction under visual conditions (F = 7.43, <i>p</i> = 0.01). In the eyes-closed condition, the FOM group exhibited faster ML sway velocity than the control group, with significant differences across all three trials. There was a significant interaction between sway direction and vision (F = 27.41, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In addition, the FOM demonstrated strong negative correlations with several QOL measures on social functioning (r = -0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and role limitations due to emotional problems (r = -0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.001) in the FOM group. While FOM influenced sway velocity during balance tasks, visual input emerged as a key determinant of postural control. The FOM group demonstrated a heightened reliance on vision, suggesting an increased need for vision-dependent strategies to maintain balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Visual Input and Kinesiophobia on Postural Control and Quality of Life in Older Adults During One-Leg Standing Tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Paul S Sung, Dongchul Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vision9010024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visual conditions significantly influence fear of movement (FOM), which is a condition that impairs postural control and quality of life (QOL). This study examined how visual conditions influence sway velocity during repeated one-leg standing tasks and explored the potential relationship between postural control, FOM, and QOL in older adults with and without FOM. Thirty-seven older adults with FOM and 37 controls participated in the study. Postural sway velocity was measured across three repeated trials under visual conditions in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. The groups demonstrated significant interaction under visual conditions (F = 7.43, <i>p</i> = 0.01). In the eyes-closed condition, the FOM group exhibited faster ML sway velocity than the control group, with significant differences across all three trials. There was a significant interaction between sway direction and vision (F = 27.41, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In addition, the FOM demonstrated strong negative correlations with several QOL measures on social functioning (r = -0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and role limitations due to emotional problems (r = -0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.001) in the FOM group. While FOM influenced sway velocity during balance tasks, visual input emerged as a key determinant of postural control. The FOM group demonstrated a heightened reliance on vision, suggesting an increased need for vision-dependent strategies to maintain balance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9010024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9010024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视觉条件显著影响运动恐惧(FOM),这是一种损害姿势控制和生活质量(QOL)的条件。本研究考察了视觉条件对重复单腿站立任务中摇摆速度的影响,并探讨了姿势控制、FOM和生活质量在有和没有FOM的老年人中的潜在关系。37名患有FOM的老年人和37名对照组参加了这项研究。体位摇摆速度在视觉条件下在前后(AP)和中外侧(ML)方向上进行了三次重复试验。两组在视觉条件下表现出显著的交互作用(F = 7.43, p = 0.01)。在闭眼条件下,FOM组比对照组表现出更快的ML摇摆速度,在三个试验中都有显著差异。摇摆方向与视力之间存在显著的交互作用(F = 27.41, p = 0.001)。此外,在FOM组中,FOM与社会功能(r = -0.69, p = 0.001)和由于情绪问题引起的角色限制(r = -0.58, p = 0.001)的几个生活质量指标表现出强烈的负相关。当FOM影响平衡任务中的摇摆速度时,视觉输入成为姿势控制的关键决定因素。FOM组表现出对视觉的高度依赖,这表明他们更需要依赖视觉的策略来保持平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Visual Input and Kinesiophobia on Postural Control and Quality of Life in Older Adults During One-Leg Standing Tasks.

Visual conditions significantly influence fear of movement (FOM), which is a condition that impairs postural control and quality of life (QOL). This study examined how visual conditions influence sway velocity during repeated one-leg standing tasks and explored the potential relationship between postural control, FOM, and QOL in older adults with and without FOM. Thirty-seven older adults with FOM and 37 controls participated in the study. Postural sway velocity was measured across three repeated trials under visual conditions in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. The groups demonstrated significant interaction under visual conditions (F = 7.43, p = 0.01). In the eyes-closed condition, the FOM group exhibited faster ML sway velocity than the control group, with significant differences across all three trials. There was a significant interaction between sway direction and vision (F = 27.41, p = 0.001). In addition, the FOM demonstrated strong negative correlations with several QOL measures on social functioning (r = -0.69, p = 0.001) and role limitations due to emotional problems (r = -0.58, p = 0.001) in the FOM group. While FOM influenced sway velocity during balance tasks, visual input emerged as a key determinant of postural control. The FOM group demonstrated a heightened reliance on vision, suggesting an increased need for vision-dependent strategies to maintain balance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信