平台设计和可用性对依从性和保留率的影响:基于网络和移动设备的随机纵向研究。

Q2 Medicine
Xinrui Jiang, Michelle Timmons, Elias Boroda, Marie Onakomaiya
{"title":"平台设计和可用性对依从性和保留率的影响:基于网络和移动设备的随机纵向研究。","authors":"Xinrui Jiang, Michelle Timmons, Elias Boroda, Marie Onakomaiya","doi":"10.2196/50225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low retention and adherence increase clinical trial costs and timelines. Burdens associated with participating in a clinical trial contribute to early study termination. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tools reduce participant burden by allowing remote participation, and facilitate communication between researchers and participants. The Datacubed Health (DCH) mobile app is unique among ePRO platforms in its application of behavioral science principles (reward, motivation, identity, etc) in clinical trials to promote engagement, adherence, and retention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the impact of platform design and usability on adherence and retention with a longitudinal study involving repeated patient-facing study instruments. We expected participants assigned to complete instruments in the DCH mobile app to stay in this study longer (increased retention) and complete more surveys while in this study (increased adherence) due to the enhanced motivational elements unique to the participant experience in the DCH app group, and this group's overall lower burden of participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 284 adult participants completed 24 weekly surveys via 1 of 4 modalities (DCH app vs DCH website vs third-party website vs paper) in a web-based and mobile longitudinal study. Participants were recruited from open access websites (eg, Craigslist or Facebook [Meta]), and a closed web-based user group. All participation occurred remotely. Study staff deliberately limited communications with participants to directly assess the main effects of survey administration modality; enrollment and study administration were largely automated. Participants assigned to the DCH app group experienced behavioral science-driven motivational elements related to reward and identity formation throughout their study journey. There was no homolog to this feature in any other tested platform. Participants assigned to the DCH app group accessed study measures using passcodes or smartphone biometrics (face or touch ID). Participants in the DCH website group logged into a website using a username and password. Participants in the third-party website group accessed web-based surveys via personalized emailed links with no need for password authentication. Paper arm participants received paper surveys in the mail.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mode of survey administration (DCH app vs DCH website vs third-party website vs paper) predicted study retention (F9,255=4.22, P<.001) and adherence (F9,162=5.5, P<.001). The DCH app group had greater retention than the paper arm (t=-3.80, P<.001), and comparable retention to the DCH website group. The DCH app group had greater adherence than all other arms (DCH web: t=-2.42, P=.02; third-party web: t=-3.56, P<.001; and paper arm: t=-4.53, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using an ePRO platform in a longitudinal study increased retention and adherence in comparison to paper instruments. Incorporating behavioral science design in an ePRO platform resulted in further increase in adherence in a longitudinal study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"e50225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Platform Design and Usability on Adherence and Retention: Randomized Web- and Mobile-Based Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xinrui Jiang, Michelle Timmons, Elias Boroda, Marie Onakomaiya\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/50225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low retention and adherence increase clinical trial costs and timelines. Burdens associated with participating in a clinical trial contribute to early study termination. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tools reduce participant burden by allowing remote participation, and facilitate communication between researchers and participants. The Datacubed Health (DCH) mobile app is unique among ePRO platforms in its application of behavioral science principles (reward, motivation, identity, etc) in clinical trials to promote engagement, adherence, and retention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the impact of platform design and usability on adherence and retention with a longitudinal study involving repeated patient-facing study instruments. We expected participants assigned to complete instruments in the DCH mobile app to stay in this study longer (increased retention) and complete more surveys while in this study (increased adherence) due to the enhanced motivational elements unique to the participant experience in the DCH app group, and this group's overall lower burden of participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 284 adult participants completed 24 weekly surveys via 1 of 4 modalities (DCH app vs DCH website vs third-party website vs paper) in a web-based and mobile longitudinal study. Participants were recruited from open access websites (eg, Craigslist or Facebook [Meta]), and a closed web-based user group. All participation occurred remotely. Study staff deliberately limited communications with participants to directly assess the main effects of survey administration modality; enrollment and study administration were largely automated. Participants assigned to the DCH app group experienced behavioral science-driven motivational elements related to reward and identity formation throughout their study journey. There was no homolog to this feature in any other tested platform. Participants assigned to the DCH app group accessed study measures using passcodes or smartphone biometrics (face or touch ID). Participants in the DCH website group logged into a website using a username and password. Participants in the third-party website group accessed web-based surveys via personalized emailed links with no need for password authentication. Paper arm participants received paper surveys in the mail.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mode of survey administration (DCH app vs DCH website vs third-party website vs paper) predicted study retention (F9,255=4.22, P<.001) and adherence (F9,162=5.5, P<.001). The DCH app group had greater retention than the paper arm (t=-3.80, P<.001), and comparable retention to the DCH website group. The DCH app group had greater adherence than all other arms (DCH web: t=-2.42, P=.02; third-party web: t=-3.56, P<.001; and paper arm: t=-4.53, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using an ePRO platform in a longitudinal study increased retention and adherence in comparison to paper instruments. Incorporating behavioral science design in an ePRO platform resulted in further increase in adherence in a longitudinal study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"e50225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/50225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低保留率和依从性增加了临床试验的成本和时间。参与临床试验的相关负担会导致研究的早期终止。电子患者报告结果(ePRO)工具通过允许远程参与减轻了参与者的负担,并促进了研究人员和参与者之间的沟通。data acubed Health (DCH)移动应用程序在ePRO平台中是独一无二的,它在临床试验中应用了行为科学原理(奖励、动机、身份等),以提高参与度、依从性和留存率。目的:我们通过一项涉及重复面向患者的研究工具的纵向研究来评估平台设计和可用性对依从性和保留性的影响。我们期望分配到DCH移动应用程序中完成仪器的参与者在本研究中停留的时间更长(增加保留),并在本研究中完成更多的调查(增加依从性),这是由于DCH应用程序组中参与者体验特有的动机因素增强,并且该组的总体参与负担较低。方法:在基于网络和移动的纵向研究中,共有284名成人参与者通过4种方式(DCH app vs DCH网站vs第三方网站vs论文)中的1种完成了24周的调查。参与者是从开放访问网站(如Craigslist或Facebook [Meta])和一个封闭的网络用户组中招募的。所有的参与都是远程进行的。研究人员故意限制与参与者的沟通,以直接评估调查管理方式的主要效果;登记和研究管理基本上是自动化的。被分配到DCH应用程序组的参与者在整个学习过程中经历了与奖励和身份形成相关的行为科学驱动的动机因素。在任何其他测试平台中都没有类似的特性。分配到DCH应用程序组的参与者使用密码或智能手机生物识别技术(面部或触摸ID)访问研究措施。DCH网站组的参与者使用用户名和密码登录网站。第三方网站组的参与者通过个性化的电子邮件链接访问基于网络的调查,无需密码验证。纸面调查组的参与者通过邮件收到纸面调查。结果:调查管理模式(DCH app vs DCH网站vs第三方网站vs纸张)预测研究保留(f9255 =4.22, p结论:在纵向研究中使用ePRO平台与纸质仪器相比,增加了保留和依从性。在一项纵向研究中,将行为科学设计纳入ePRO平台导致依从性进一步增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Platform Design and Usability on Adherence and Retention: Randomized Web- and Mobile-Based Longitudinal Study.

Background: Low retention and adherence increase clinical trial costs and timelines. Burdens associated with participating in a clinical trial contribute to early study termination. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tools reduce participant burden by allowing remote participation, and facilitate communication between researchers and participants. The Datacubed Health (DCH) mobile app is unique among ePRO platforms in its application of behavioral science principles (reward, motivation, identity, etc) in clinical trials to promote engagement, adherence, and retention.

Objective: We evaluated the impact of platform design and usability on adherence and retention with a longitudinal study involving repeated patient-facing study instruments. We expected participants assigned to complete instruments in the DCH mobile app to stay in this study longer (increased retention) and complete more surveys while in this study (increased adherence) due to the enhanced motivational elements unique to the participant experience in the DCH app group, and this group's overall lower burden of participation.

Methods: A total of 284 adult participants completed 24 weekly surveys via 1 of 4 modalities (DCH app vs DCH website vs third-party website vs paper) in a web-based and mobile longitudinal study. Participants were recruited from open access websites (eg, Craigslist or Facebook [Meta]), and a closed web-based user group. All participation occurred remotely. Study staff deliberately limited communications with participants to directly assess the main effects of survey administration modality; enrollment and study administration were largely automated. Participants assigned to the DCH app group experienced behavioral science-driven motivational elements related to reward and identity formation throughout their study journey. There was no homolog to this feature in any other tested platform. Participants assigned to the DCH app group accessed study measures using passcodes or smartphone biometrics (face or touch ID). Participants in the DCH website group logged into a website using a username and password. Participants in the third-party website group accessed web-based surveys via personalized emailed links with no need for password authentication. Paper arm participants received paper surveys in the mail.

Results: Mode of survey administration (DCH app vs DCH website vs third-party website vs paper) predicted study retention (F9,255=4.22, P<.001) and adherence (F9,162=5.5, P<.001). The DCH app group had greater retention than the paper arm (t=-3.80, P<.001), and comparable retention to the DCH website group. The DCH app group had greater adherence than all other arms (DCH web: t=-2.42, P=.02; third-party web: t=-3.56, P<.001; and paper arm: t=-4.53, P<.001).

Conclusions: Using an ePRO platform in a longitudinal study increased retention and adherence in comparison to paper instruments. Incorporating behavioral science design in an ePRO platform resulted in further increase in adherence in a longitudinal study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信