迟发性胎儿生长受限时上腔静脉血流和脑保留的多普勒指数。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Maria Stefopoulou, Jonas Johnson, Peter Lindgren, Ganesh Acharya
{"title":"迟发性胎儿生长受限时上腔静脉血流和脑保留的多普勒指数。","authors":"Maria Stefopoulou, Jonas Johnson, Peter Lindgren, Ganesh Acharya","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-94621-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral hemodynamic adaptation in fetal growth restriction (FGR) is primarily assessed using middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler and cerebroplacental (CPR) or umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR). The superior vena cava (SVC) blood flow may provide additional hemodynamic insights. Our objective was to evaluate fetal SVC blood flow velocities, pulsatility index for vein (PIV), volume blood flow (QSVC), and volume blood flow (Q)-based indices of fetal brain sparing in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and FGR fetuses in the third trimester of pregnancy and compare with appropriately grown (AGA) fetuses. This was a prospective cohort study of 40 non-anomalous, singleton fetuses during 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 gestational weeks. Fetuses with abdominal circumference or estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile were classified into SGA and FGR groups based on Delphi criteria. Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery (UA), umbilical vein (UV), fetal MCA and SVC was performed. UV and SVC diameters were measured, and their volume blood flows, i.e. QUV and QSVC were calculated. Both pulsatility index (PI)-based and Q-based indices of fetal brain sparing were calculated and compared to previously reported reference ranges for AGA fetuses using z-scores. In our study population, z-scores of SVC velocities (except the end-diastolic A-wave velocity) and PIV were significantly lower than the gestational age-specific mean values for AGA fetuses (p-values 0.005 to 0.018). Similarly, z-scores of SVC diameter (p < 0.001), QSVC normalized to fetal weight (QSVCw) (p < 0.001), blood flow volume-based QCPR (p < 0.001) were higher and QUCR (p < 0.001) was lower. However, z-scores of PI-based CPR (p = 0.195), UCR (p = 0.195), and the end-diastolic (A wave) velocity (p = 0.177) were not significantly different compared to AGA fetuses. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the FGR fetuses (n = 21) had increased SVC diameter (p < 0.001), QSVCw (p < 0.001), QCPR (p < 0.001), UCR (p < 0.001), and decreased CPR (p < 0.001), QUCR (p < 0.001) and SVC PIV (p = 0.030), but no significant change in velocities was observed compared to AGA fetuses (n = 98) of similar gestational age. The SGA fetuses (n = 19) had decreased SVC S velocity (p = 0.013), D velocity (p = 0.005), TAMxV (p = 0.030), PIV (p = 0.005), QUCR (p = 0.014), and increased SVC diameter (p = 0.026), QSVCw (p = 0.034) and QCPR (p = 0.014) in comparison to AGA fetuses. When compared to SGA fetuses, the FGR fetuses had significantly lower QUVw (60.5 ± 19.7 vs. 80.1 ± 20.2 ml/min/kg, p = 0.004), QUCR (0.79 ± 0.45 vs. 1.34 ± 0.52 p < 0.001) and birthweight (2181 ± 577 vs. 2848 ± 330 g, p < 0.001) but higher QSVCw (91.82 ± 39.56 vs. 65.53 ± 17.79 ml/min/kg, p = 0.039) and QCPR (1.63 ± 0.74 vs. 0.90 ± 0.45, p < 0.001). In conclusion, third-trimester fetuses < 10th percentile had significantly increased SVC diameter, resulting in increased QSVCw in SGA and FGR despite reduced or unchanged TAMxV. Significantly altered QCPR and QUCR confirmed circulatory redistribution with increased brain and upper body venous return both in FGR and SGA fetuses. However, as the magnitude of increase in QSVCw and QCPR was significantly larger in FGR compared to SGA fetuses, it could be potentially used as a quantifiable marker to differentiate FGR from SGA. The role of SVC Doppler in refining the diagnosis of late FGR should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"10610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superior vena cava blood flow and Doppler indices of brain sparing in late onset fetal growth restriction.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Stefopoulou, Jonas Johnson, Peter Lindgren, Ganesh Acharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-94621-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cerebral hemodynamic adaptation in fetal growth restriction (FGR) is primarily assessed using middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler and cerebroplacental (CPR) or umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR). The superior vena cava (SVC) blood flow may provide additional hemodynamic insights. Our objective was to evaluate fetal SVC blood flow velocities, pulsatility index for vein (PIV), volume blood flow (QSVC), and volume blood flow (Q)-based indices of fetal brain sparing in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and FGR fetuses in the third trimester of pregnancy and compare with appropriately grown (AGA) fetuses. This was a prospective cohort study of 40 non-anomalous, singleton fetuses during 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 gestational weeks. Fetuses with abdominal circumference or estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile were classified into SGA and FGR groups based on Delphi criteria. Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery (UA), umbilical vein (UV), fetal MCA and SVC was performed. UV and SVC diameters were measured, and their volume blood flows, i.e. QUV and QSVC were calculated. Both pulsatility index (PI)-based and Q-based indices of fetal brain sparing were calculated and compared to previously reported reference ranges for AGA fetuses using z-scores. In our study population, z-scores of SVC velocities (except the end-diastolic A-wave velocity) and PIV were significantly lower than the gestational age-specific mean values for AGA fetuses (p-values 0.005 to 0.018). Similarly, z-scores of SVC diameter (p < 0.001), QSVC normalized to fetal weight (QSVCw) (p < 0.001), blood flow volume-based QCPR (p < 0.001) were higher and QUCR (p < 0.001) was lower. However, z-scores of PI-based CPR (p = 0.195), UCR (p = 0.195), and the end-diastolic (A wave) velocity (p = 0.177) were not significantly different compared to AGA fetuses. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the FGR fetuses (n = 21) had increased SVC diameter (p < 0.001), QSVCw (p < 0.001), QCPR (p < 0.001), UCR (p < 0.001), and decreased CPR (p < 0.001), QUCR (p < 0.001) and SVC PIV (p = 0.030), but no significant change in velocities was observed compared to AGA fetuses (n = 98) of similar gestational age. The SGA fetuses (n = 19) had decreased SVC S velocity (p = 0.013), D velocity (p = 0.005), TAMxV (p = 0.030), PIV (p = 0.005), QUCR (p = 0.014), and increased SVC diameter (p = 0.026), QSVCw (p = 0.034) and QCPR (p = 0.014) in comparison to AGA fetuses. When compared to SGA fetuses, the FGR fetuses had significantly lower QUVw (60.5 ± 19.7 vs. 80.1 ± 20.2 ml/min/kg, p = 0.004), QUCR (0.79 ± 0.45 vs. 1.34 ± 0.52 p < 0.001) and birthweight (2181 ± 577 vs. 2848 ± 330 g, p < 0.001) but higher QSVCw (91.82 ± 39.56 vs. 65.53 ± 17.79 ml/min/kg, p = 0.039) and QCPR (1.63 ± 0.74 vs. 0.90 ± 0.45, p < 0.001). In conclusion, third-trimester fetuses < 10th percentile had significantly increased SVC diameter, resulting in increased QSVCw in SGA and FGR despite reduced or unchanged TAMxV. Significantly altered QCPR and QUCR confirmed circulatory redistribution with increased brain and upper body venous return both in FGR and SGA fetuses. However, as the magnitude of increase in QSVCw and QCPR was significantly larger in FGR compared to SGA fetuses, it could be potentially used as a quantifiable marker to differentiate FGR from SGA. The role of SVC Doppler in refining the diagnosis of late FGR should be further investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"10610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94621-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94621-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胎儿生长受限(FGR)的脑血流动力学适应主要通过大脑中动脉(MCA)多普勒和脑胎盘(CPR)或脐脑比(UCR)来评估。上腔静脉(SVC)血流可以提供额外的血流动力学信息。我们的目的是评估妊娠晚期小胎龄(SGA)和FGR胎儿的SVC血流速度、静脉脉搏指数(PIV)、血容量(QSVC)和基于血容量(Q)的胎儿脑保留指标,并与适当生长(AGA)胎儿进行比较。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为40名32 + 0至36 + 6妊娠周的非异常单胎胎儿。根据德尔菲标准将腹围或估计胎儿体重低于第10百分位的胎儿分为SGA组和FGR组。多普勒测速脐动脉(UA)、脐静脉(UV)、胎儿MCA和SVC。测量UV和SVC直径,计算其体积血流量,即QUV和QSVC。计算基于脉搏指数(PI)和基于q的胎儿脑保留指数,并使用z分数与先前报道的AGA胎儿参考范围进行比较。在我们的研究人群中,SVC速度(舒张末期a波速度除外)和PIV的z分数显著低于AGA胎儿的妊娠年龄特异性平均值(p值为0.005至0.018)。同样,SVC直径的z分数(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Superior vena cava blood flow and Doppler indices of brain sparing in late onset fetal growth restriction.

Superior vena cava blood flow and Doppler indices of brain sparing in late onset fetal growth restriction.

Superior vena cava blood flow and Doppler indices of brain sparing in late onset fetal growth restriction.

Superior vena cava blood flow and Doppler indices of brain sparing in late onset fetal growth restriction.

Cerebral hemodynamic adaptation in fetal growth restriction (FGR) is primarily assessed using middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler and cerebroplacental (CPR) or umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR). The superior vena cava (SVC) blood flow may provide additional hemodynamic insights. Our objective was to evaluate fetal SVC blood flow velocities, pulsatility index for vein (PIV), volume blood flow (QSVC), and volume blood flow (Q)-based indices of fetal brain sparing in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and FGR fetuses in the third trimester of pregnancy and compare with appropriately grown (AGA) fetuses. This was a prospective cohort study of 40 non-anomalous, singleton fetuses during 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 gestational weeks. Fetuses with abdominal circumference or estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile were classified into SGA and FGR groups based on Delphi criteria. Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical artery (UA), umbilical vein (UV), fetal MCA and SVC was performed. UV and SVC diameters were measured, and their volume blood flows, i.e. QUV and QSVC were calculated. Both pulsatility index (PI)-based and Q-based indices of fetal brain sparing were calculated and compared to previously reported reference ranges for AGA fetuses using z-scores. In our study population, z-scores of SVC velocities (except the end-diastolic A-wave velocity) and PIV were significantly lower than the gestational age-specific mean values for AGA fetuses (p-values 0.005 to 0.018). Similarly, z-scores of SVC diameter (p < 0.001), QSVC normalized to fetal weight (QSVCw) (p < 0.001), blood flow volume-based QCPR (p < 0.001) were higher and QUCR (p < 0.001) was lower. However, z-scores of PI-based CPR (p = 0.195), UCR (p = 0.195), and the end-diastolic (A wave) velocity (p = 0.177) were not significantly different compared to AGA fetuses. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the FGR fetuses (n = 21) had increased SVC diameter (p < 0.001), QSVCw (p < 0.001), QCPR (p < 0.001), UCR (p < 0.001), and decreased CPR (p < 0.001), QUCR (p < 0.001) and SVC PIV (p = 0.030), but no significant change in velocities was observed compared to AGA fetuses (n = 98) of similar gestational age. The SGA fetuses (n = 19) had decreased SVC S velocity (p = 0.013), D velocity (p = 0.005), TAMxV (p = 0.030), PIV (p = 0.005), QUCR (p = 0.014), and increased SVC diameter (p = 0.026), QSVCw (p = 0.034) and QCPR (p = 0.014) in comparison to AGA fetuses. When compared to SGA fetuses, the FGR fetuses had significantly lower QUVw (60.5 ± 19.7 vs. 80.1 ± 20.2 ml/min/kg, p = 0.004), QUCR (0.79 ± 0.45 vs. 1.34 ± 0.52 p < 0.001) and birthweight (2181 ± 577 vs. 2848 ± 330 g, p < 0.001) but higher QSVCw (91.82 ± 39.56 vs. 65.53 ± 17.79 ml/min/kg, p = 0.039) and QCPR (1.63 ± 0.74 vs. 0.90 ± 0.45, p < 0.001). In conclusion, third-trimester fetuses < 10th percentile had significantly increased SVC diameter, resulting in increased QSVCw in SGA and FGR despite reduced or unchanged TAMxV. Significantly altered QCPR and QUCR confirmed circulatory redistribution with increased brain and upper body venous return both in FGR and SGA fetuses. However, as the magnitude of increase in QSVCw and QCPR was significantly larger in FGR compared to SGA fetuses, it could be potentially used as a quantifiable marker to differentiate FGR from SGA. The role of SVC Doppler in refining the diagnosis of late FGR should be further investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信