IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.3390/toxics13030159
Irene Lidoriki, Bogdan Anđelic, Fan-Yun Lan, Maria Soledad Hershey, Spyridon Georgakopoulos, Kishor Hadkhale, Eleni Speros, Mercedes Sotos-Prieto, Costas A Christophi, Stefanos N Kales
{"title":"Beta and Pilot Testing of the Surviving & Thriving Healthy Lifestyle App: A Countermeasure to Firefighters' Occupational Health Risks.","authors":"Irene Lidoriki, Bogdan Anđelic, Fan-Yun Lan, Maria Soledad Hershey, Spyridon Georgakopoulos, Kishor Hadkhale, Eleni Speros, Mercedes Sotos-Prieto, Costas A Christophi, Stefanos N Kales","doi":"10.3390/toxics13030159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Firefighters face elevated chronic disease risks, and interventions promoting healthier lifestyles are essential for improving their well-being. This study aimed to beta test and further evaluate a healthy lifestyle app (HLS app) for firefighters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Beta usability testing was conducted with new firefighters after using the app. Pilot testing was conducted in two cohorts, (1) the Connecticut Fire Academy Class A-CCA after graduation and (2) the Connecticut Class B-CCB and Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Academy, during academy training to evaluate the potential efficacy of the HLS app in improving healthy lifestyle behaviors, mental health, and physical fitness over three months of use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beta testing (n = 93) revealed positive usability feedback, with 62% finding it useful for their health. Pilot testing after graduation (n = 28) was associated with increased push-up capacity (35.6 ± 11.7 vs. 42.9 ± 16.1, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and improved mental health scores. Pilot testing during academy training (n = 90) was associated with improvements in push-up capacity (33.8 ± 10.8 vs. 41 ± 10.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001), pull-ups (7 [4-11] vs. 10.5 [6-14], <i>p</i> < 0.001), 1.5-mile run time (11.96 ± 1.43 vs. 11.26 ± 1.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001), BMI (26.7 [24.3-29.7] vs. 25.95 [24.0-28.8], <i>p</i> < 0.001), and mental health scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The app was well received and showed potential for improving firefighter health. A randomized controlled trial is needed to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of the HLS app.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13030159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:消防员面临着较高的慢性病风险,而促进健康生活方式的干预措施对于改善他们的健康状况至关重要。本研究旨在对一款针对消防员的健康生活方式应用程序(HLS 应用程序)进行测试和进一步评估:方法:在新消防员使用该应用程序后对其进行可用性测试。在两批学员中进行了试点测试:(1) 康涅狄格州消防学院 A-CCA 级学员毕业后;(2) 康涅狄格州 B-CCB 级学员和迈阿密-戴德消防救援学院学员在学院培训期间,以评估健康生活方式应用程序在使用三个月后对改善健康生活方式行为、心理健康和体能的潜在功效:Beta 测试(93 人)显示了积极的可用性反馈,62% 的人认为该应用程序对他们的健康有益。毕业后的试点测试(n = 28)与俯卧撑能力的提高(35.6 ± 11.7 vs. 42.9 ± 16.1,p = 0.006)和心理健康评分的改善有关。学院培训期间的试点测试(n = 90)与俯卧撑能力(33.8 ± 10.8 vs. 41 ± 10.6,p < 0.001)、引体向上(7 [4-11] vs. 10.5[6-14],p < 0.001)、1.5 英里跑步时间(11.96 ± 1.43 vs. 11.26 ± 1.1,p < 0.001)、体重指数(26.7 [24.3-29.7] vs. 25.95 [24.0-28.8],p < 0.001)和心理健康评分:该应用程序广受好评,显示出改善消防员健康的潜力。需要进行随机对照试验,以严格评估 HLS 应用程序的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beta and Pilot Testing of the Surviving & Thriving Healthy Lifestyle App: A Countermeasure to Firefighters' Occupational Health Risks.

Background: Firefighters face elevated chronic disease risks, and interventions promoting healthier lifestyles are essential for improving their well-being. This study aimed to beta test and further evaluate a healthy lifestyle app (HLS app) for firefighters.

Methods: Beta usability testing was conducted with new firefighters after using the app. Pilot testing was conducted in two cohorts, (1) the Connecticut Fire Academy Class A-CCA after graduation and (2) the Connecticut Class B-CCB and Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Academy, during academy training to evaluate the potential efficacy of the HLS app in improving healthy lifestyle behaviors, mental health, and physical fitness over three months of use.

Results: Beta testing (n = 93) revealed positive usability feedback, with 62% finding it useful for their health. Pilot testing after graduation (n = 28) was associated with increased push-up capacity (35.6 ± 11.7 vs. 42.9 ± 16.1, p = 0.006) and improved mental health scores. Pilot testing during academy training (n = 90) was associated with improvements in push-up capacity (33.8 ± 10.8 vs. 41 ± 10.6, p < 0.001), pull-ups (7 [4-11] vs. 10.5 [6-14], p < 0.001), 1.5-mile run time (11.96 ± 1.43 vs. 11.26 ± 1.1, p < 0.001), BMI (26.7 [24.3-29.7] vs. 25.95 [24.0-28.8], p < 0.001), and mental health scores.

Conclusions: The app was well received and showed potential for improving firefighter health. A randomized controlled trial is needed to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of the HLS app.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信