非姑息性呼吸护理团队对难治性呼吸困难管理的跨学科方法对患者生活质量的影响:一项试点研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1159/000545313
Gregory Clark, Noemie Vuilleumier, Leo Vanini, Marc Marechal, Jean-Marc Fellrath
{"title":"非姑息性呼吸护理团队对难治性呼吸困难管理的跨学科方法对患者生活质量的影响:一项试点研究。","authors":"Gregory Clark, Noemie Vuilleumier, Leo Vanini, Marc Marechal, Jean-Marc Fellrath","doi":"10.1159/000545313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Refractory dyspnoea is a common symptom of chronic respiratory disease, often poorly recognized by healthcare professionals. Pharmacological treatments are of limited effectiveness. A multidisciplinary intervention carried out by a specialized palliative care team has demonstrated its effectiveness in helping patients improve their quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this pilot study was to verify the effects of a multidisciplinary intervention carried out by a team not specialized in palliative care (physician, psychologist, physiotherapist, social worker, dietician).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, single-arm interventional study was conducted between February 2019 and May 2022. All consecutive patients with refractory dyspnoea - referred by a pulmonologist - had a non-pharmacological paramedical intervention (ventilatory education, mindfulness meditation, respiratory rehabilitation, psychological and dietary support, etc.) tailored to their situation after an initial interview. The primary endpoint was the evolution of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were referred; 56 patients underwent the intervention. Patients were comparable to previous studies on the basis of LCADL and ESAS scores. The CRQ increased from 4.7 ± 1.5 to 6.2 ± 1.5 pre- and post-intervention overall (P<0.001), with a significant change in all sub-items (fatigue, dyspnoea, emotional function, control).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A non-specialized multidisciplinary palliative care team can help patients with refractory dyspnoea improve their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of an interdisciplinary approach to the management of refractory dyspnoea on patient quality of life by a non-palliative respiratory care team: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Gregory Clark, Noemie Vuilleumier, Leo Vanini, Marc Marechal, Jean-Marc Fellrath\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Refractory dyspnoea is a common symptom of chronic respiratory disease, often poorly recognized by healthcare professionals. Pharmacological treatments are of limited effectiveness. A multidisciplinary intervention carried out by a specialized palliative care team has demonstrated its effectiveness in helping patients improve their quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this pilot study was to verify the effects of a multidisciplinary intervention carried out by a team not specialized in palliative care (physician, psychologist, physiotherapist, social worker, dietician).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, single-arm interventional study was conducted between February 2019 and May 2022. All consecutive patients with refractory dyspnoea - referred by a pulmonologist - had a non-pharmacological paramedical intervention (ventilatory education, mindfulness meditation, respiratory rehabilitation, psychological and dietary support, etc.) tailored to their situation after an initial interview. The primary endpoint was the evolution of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were referred; 56 patients underwent the intervention. Patients were comparable to previous studies on the basis of LCADL and ESAS scores. The CRQ increased from 4.7 ± 1.5 to 6.2 ± 1.5 pre- and post-intervention overall (P<0.001), with a significant change in all sub-items (fatigue, dyspnoea, emotional function, control).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A non-specialized multidisciplinary palliative care team can help patients with refractory dyspnoea improve their quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545313\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

难治性呼吸困难是慢性呼吸系统疾病的常见症状,但卫生保健专业人员往往很少认识到这一点。药物治疗的效果有限。由专业姑息治疗团队进行的多学科干预已证明其在帮助患者改善生活质量方面的有效性。目的:本初步研究的目的是验证由非姑息治疗专业团队(医生、心理学家、物理治疗师、社会工作者、营养师)实施的多学科干预的效果。方法:在2019年2月至2022年5月期间进行了一项纵向单臂介入研究。所有连续的难治性呼吸困难患者——由肺科医生转诊——在初次访谈后根据他们的情况进行了非药物辅助医疗干预(通气教育、正念冥想、呼吸康复、心理和饮食支持等)。主要终点是干预前后慢性呼吸问卷(CRQ)的演变。结果:共转诊58例;56例患者接受了干预。在LCADL和ESAS评分的基础上,患者与先前的研究具有可比性。CRQ从干预前的4.7±1.5提高到干预后的6.2±1.5。结论:非专业多学科的姑息治疗团队可以帮助难治性呼吸困难患者改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of an interdisciplinary approach to the management of refractory dyspnoea on patient quality of life by a non-palliative respiratory care team: a pilot study.

Introduction: Refractory dyspnoea is a common symptom of chronic respiratory disease, often poorly recognized by healthcare professionals. Pharmacological treatments are of limited effectiveness. A multidisciplinary intervention carried out by a specialized palliative care team has demonstrated its effectiveness in helping patients improve their quality of life.

Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to verify the effects of a multidisciplinary intervention carried out by a team not specialized in palliative care (physician, psychologist, physiotherapist, social worker, dietician).

Methods: A longitudinal, single-arm interventional study was conducted between February 2019 and May 2022. All consecutive patients with refractory dyspnoea - referred by a pulmonologist - had a non-pharmacological paramedical intervention (ventilatory education, mindfulness meditation, respiratory rehabilitation, psychological and dietary support, etc.) tailored to their situation after an initial interview. The primary endpoint was the evolution of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) before and after the intervention.

Results: Fifty-eight patients were referred; 56 patients underwent the intervention. Patients were comparable to previous studies on the basis of LCADL and ESAS scores. The CRQ increased from 4.7 ± 1.5 to 6.2 ± 1.5 pre- and post-intervention overall (P<0.001), with a significant change in all sub-items (fatigue, dyspnoea, emotional function, control).

Conclusion: A non-specialized multidisciplinary palliative care team can help patients with refractory dyspnoea improve their quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信