评估执行情况和健康公平决定因素,以制定促进计划,在少数民族服务机构中进行不同强度的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nuha Alshabani, Laura Godfrey, Cara Fuchs, Richy Villa, Daisy Perez, Sarah E Valentine
{"title":"评估执行情况和健康公平决定因素,以制定促进计划,在少数民族服务机构中进行不同强度的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗。","authors":"Nuha Alshabani, Laura Godfrey, Cara Fuchs, Richy Villa, Daisy Perez, Sarah E Valentine","doi":"10.1037/ser0000941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though the implementation of science frameworks has recently been expanded to understand determinants of health equity (Woodward et al., 2021), the application of these frameworks in safety net hospital settings is new. We applied the health equity implementation framework to (a) understand the determinants of implementation and equity and (b) develop an institution-wide implementation facilitation plan for three evidence-based practices (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder. We utilized researcher field notes from clinical case consultation gathered during posttraumatic stress disorder treatment implementation initiatives (cognitive processing therapy, written exposure therapy, brief skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation) at the same safety net hospital (<i>N</i> = 94 meetings total, from 2020 to 2023) to assess determinants of implementation and equity. We developed a qualitative codebook based on the health equity implementation framework to specify determinants and then built an implementation facilitation toolkit for multi-EBP implementation. Similar determinants were found across clinics and EBPs (e.g., provider training gaps and misperceptions about manualized treatments; inefficiencies in identification, triage, and referral pathways; patient engagement barriers related to stigma, literacy, and mistrust) with additional nuance per clinic and EBP. Institution-wide facilitation strategies were then utilized to enhance implementation and equity and focused on enhancing both access and quality of services (e.g., training and consultation, refining referral pathways) and patient engagement (e.g., culturally responsive training, consultation, and treatment delivery). Implementation science has an important role to play in enhancing health equity. Our findings illustrate how pooling determinants across clinics and treatments can help implementation scientists engage with hospital leadership and advocate for system-level implementation facilitation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing implementation and health equity determinants to develop a facilitation plan for varied intensity posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments in minority-serving institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Nuha Alshabani, Laura Godfrey, Cara Fuchs, Richy Villa, Daisy Perez, Sarah E Valentine\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Though the implementation of science frameworks has recently been expanded to understand determinants of health equity (Woodward et al., 2021), the application of these frameworks in safety net hospital settings is new. We applied the health equity implementation framework to (a) understand the determinants of implementation and equity and (b) develop an institution-wide implementation facilitation plan for three evidence-based practices (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder. We utilized researcher field notes from clinical case consultation gathered during posttraumatic stress disorder treatment implementation initiatives (cognitive processing therapy, written exposure therapy, brief skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation) at the same safety net hospital (<i>N</i> = 94 meetings total, from 2020 to 2023) to assess determinants of implementation and equity. We developed a qualitative codebook based on the health equity implementation framework to specify determinants and then built an implementation facilitation toolkit for multi-EBP implementation. Similar determinants were found across clinics and EBPs (e.g., provider training gaps and misperceptions about manualized treatments; inefficiencies in identification, triage, and referral pathways; patient engagement barriers related to stigma, literacy, and mistrust) with additional nuance per clinic and EBP. Institution-wide facilitation strategies were then utilized to enhance implementation and equity and focused on enhancing both access and quality of services (e.g., training and consultation, refining referral pathways) and patient engagement (e.g., culturally responsive training, consultation, and treatment delivery). Implementation science has an important role to play in enhancing health equity. Our findings illustrate how pooling determinants across clinics and treatments can help implementation scientists engage with hospital leadership and advocate for system-level implementation facilitation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000941\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然科学框架的实施最近已扩大到了解卫生公平的决定因素(Woodward等人,2021年),但这些框架在安全网医院环境中的应用是新的。我们将健康公平实施框架应用于(a)了解实施和公平的决定因素,以及(b)为三种创伤后应激障碍循证实践(ebp)制定全机构实施促进计划。我们利用同一家安全网医院(N = 94次会议,从2020年到2023年)在创伤后应激障碍治疗实施计划(认知加工疗法、书面暴露疗法、情感和人际调节的简短技能培训)期间收集的临床病例咨询的研究人员现场记录来评估实施和公平的决定因素。我们开发了一个基于卫生公平实施框架的定性代码本,以指定决定因素,然后为多个ebp的实施建立了一个实施促进工具包。在诊所和ebp之间发现了类似的决定因素(例如,提供者培训差距和对手动治疗的误解;识别、分诊和转诊途径效率低下;患者参与障碍与耻辱感、文化素养和不信任有关),每个诊所和EBP都有额外的细微差别。然后利用全机构促进战略来加强实施和公平,并侧重于提高服务的可及性和质量(例如,培训和咨询,完善转诊途径)和患者参与(例如,符合文化的培训、咨询和治疗提供)。实施科学在促进卫生公平方面可发挥重要作用。我们的研究结果说明了如何在诊所和治疗中汇集决定因素可以帮助实施科学家与医院领导接触并倡导系统级实施促进策略。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing implementation and health equity determinants to develop a facilitation plan for varied intensity posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments in minority-serving institutions.

Though the implementation of science frameworks has recently been expanded to understand determinants of health equity (Woodward et al., 2021), the application of these frameworks in safety net hospital settings is new. We applied the health equity implementation framework to (a) understand the determinants of implementation and equity and (b) develop an institution-wide implementation facilitation plan for three evidence-based practices (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder. We utilized researcher field notes from clinical case consultation gathered during posttraumatic stress disorder treatment implementation initiatives (cognitive processing therapy, written exposure therapy, brief skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation) at the same safety net hospital (N = 94 meetings total, from 2020 to 2023) to assess determinants of implementation and equity. We developed a qualitative codebook based on the health equity implementation framework to specify determinants and then built an implementation facilitation toolkit for multi-EBP implementation. Similar determinants were found across clinics and EBPs (e.g., provider training gaps and misperceptions about manualized treatments; inefficiencies in identification, triage, and referral pathways; patient engagement barriers related to stigma, literacy, and mistrust) with additional nuance per clinic and EBP. Institution-wide facilitation strategies were then utilized to enhance implementation and equity and focused on enhancing both access and quality of services (e.g., training and consultation, refining referral pathways) and patient engagement (e.g., culturally responsive training, consultation, and treatment delivery). Implementation science has an important role to play in enhancing health equity. Our findings illustrate how pooling determinants across clinics and treatments can help implementation scientists engage with hospital leadership and advocate for system-level implementation facilitation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信