特定领域数字孪生平台的评估框架。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Zhao Tang, Dayuan Zhuang, Jianjun Zhang
{"title":"特定领域数字孪生平台的评估框架。","authors":"Zhao Tang, Dayuan Zhuang, Jianjun Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As digital twin (DT) applications continue to proliferate across diverse industries, a noticeable gap exists in the availability of evaluation methods or frameworks to aid in the selection and development of DT platforms, particularly for Domain-Specific applications. To address this gap, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for DT platforms, with a focus on Domain-Specific applications. The framework uses the Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (BWM-FCE) to assess the performance, user experience, and economic effects of DT platforms. The proposed framework is applied to a case study of a high-speed train DT platform and compared with other evaluation methods AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and BWM-SPA (Best-Worst Method-Set Pair Analysis). The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed framework and highlight its potential for guiding the development and selection of DT platforms for Domain-Specific applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"10544"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation framework for domain-specific digital twin platforms.\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Tang, Dayuan Zhuang, Jianjun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As digital twin (DT) applications continue to proliferate across diverse industries, a noticeable gap exists in the availability of evaluation methods or frameworks to aid in the selection and development of DT platforms, particularly for Domain-Specific applications. To address this gap, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for DT platforms, with a focus on Domain-Specific applications. The framework uses the Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (BWM-FCE) to assess the performance, user experience, and economic effects of DT platforms. The proposed framework is applied to a case study of a high-speed train DT platform and compared with other evaluation methods AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and BWM-SPA (Best-Worst Method-Set Pair Analysis). The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed framework and highlight its potential for guiding the development and selection of DT platforms for Domain-Specific applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"10544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82154-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着数字孪生(DT)应用在各行各业的不断涌现,在评估方法或框架的可用性方面存在明显差距,无法帮助选择和开发 DT 平台,尤其是针对特定领域的应用。为弥补这一不足,本文提出了一个针对 DT 平台的综合评估框架,重点关注特定领域的应用。该框架使用最佳-最差法和模糊综合评估法(BWM-FCE)来评估 DT 平台的性能、用户体验和经济效果。所提出的框架被应用于高速列车 DT 平台的案例研究,并与其他评估方法 AHP(层次分析法)和 BWM-SPA(最佳-最差法-集对分析法)进行了比较。结果证明了所提框架的可行性和有效性,并强调了其在指导特定领域应用的 DT 平台开发和选择方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation framework for domain-specific digital twin platforms.

Evaluation framework for domain-specific digital twin platforms.

Evaluation framework for domain-specific digital twin platforms.

Evaluation framework for domain-specific digital twin platforms.

As digital twin (DT) applications continue to proliferate across diverse industries, a noticeable gap exists in the availability of evaluation methods or frameworks to aid in the selection and development of DT platforms, particularly for Domain-Specific applications. To address this gap, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework for DT platforms, with a focus on Domain-Specific applications. The framework uses the Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (BWM-FCE) to assess the performance, user experience, and economic effects of DT platforms. The proposed framework is applied to a case study of a high-speed train DT platform and compared with other evaluation methods AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and BWM-SPA (Best-Worst Method-Set Pair Analysis). The results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed framework and highlight its potential for guiding the development and selection of DT platforms for Domain-Specific applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信