根据关节线会聚角选择合适的患者,最大限度地减少楔形胫骨高位截骨和远端结节截骨后站立和仰卧位机械轴的差异。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Naosuke Nagata, Takehiko Matsushita, Shu Watanabe, Yuta Nakanishi, Kyohei Nishida, Kanto Nagai, Noriyuki Kanzaki, Yuichi Hoshino, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Ryosuke Kuroda
{"title":"根据关节线会聚角选择合适的患者,最大限度地减少楔形胫骨高位截骨和远端结节截骨后站立和仰卧位机械轴的差异。","authors":"Naosuke Nagata, Takehiko Matsushita, Shu Watanabe, Yuta Nakanishi, Kyohei Nishida, Kanto Nagai, Noriyuki Kanzaki, Yuichi Hoshino, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Ryosuke Kuroda","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05711-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the differences between the mechanical axis (MA) in standing and supine positions in patients who underwent high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or distal tuberosity osteotomy (DTO) based on the surgical indication for the joint line convergence angle (JLCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-one knees of 69 patients with JLCA of < 6° in standing position and a difference of < 3° between the JLCA in the standing and supine positions who had undergone medial open-wedge HTO or DTO were included in this study. The %MA in the standing and supine positions (%MAst and %MAsp, respectively) and JLCA in the standing and supine positions (JLCAst and JLCAsp, respectively) were determined using preoperative and postoperative long-leg-view radiographs. The difference between %MA and JLCA in the standing and supine positions (Δ%MA and ΔJLCA, respectively) was calculated by subtracting the measurement value in the supine position from that in the standing position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative %MAst, %MAsp, JLCAst, and JLCAsp were 23.8 ± 9.5%, 28.7 ± 8.0%, 2.9 ± 1.4°, and 1.6 ± 1.4° respectively. The preoperative Δ%MA and ΔJLCA were - 4.9 ± 5.9% and 1.3 ± 1.0° respectively. The postoperative %MAst, %MAsp, JLCAst, and JLCAsp were 58.8 ± 6.9%, 59.0 ± 6.2%, 1.7 ± 1.0°, and 1.5 ± 1.1°, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the postoperative %MAst and %MAsp. The postoperative Δ%MA and ΔJLCA were - 0.2 ± 3.0% and 0.3 ± 0.6°, respectively. The postoperative Δ%MA was - 5 to 5% in 68 knees (95.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimal differences were observed between the Δ%MA after HTO and DTO among patients with preoperative JLCAst of < 6° and ΔJLCA and of < 3°, respectively. Appropriate surgical indications could minimize this difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriate patient selection based on joint line convergence angle minimizes the difference between the mechanical axis in the standing and supine positions after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and distal tuberosity osteotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Naosuke Nagata, Takehiko Matsushita, Shu Watanabe, Yuta Nakanishi, Kyohei Nishida, Kanto Nagai, Noriyuki Kanzaki, Yuichi Hoshino, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Ryosuke Kuroda\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-05711-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the differences between the mechanical axis (MA) in standing and supine positions in patients who underwent high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or distal tuberosity osteotomy (DTO) based on the surgical indication for the joint line convergence angle (JLCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-one knees of 69 patients with JLCA of < 6° in standing position and a difference of < 3° between the JLCA in the standing and supine positions who had undergone medial open-wedge HTO or DTO were included in this study. The %MA in the standing and supine positions (%MAst and %MAsp, respectively) and JLCA in the standing and supine positions (JLCAst and JLCAsp, respectively) were determined using preoperative and postoperative long-leg-view radiographs. The difference between %MA and JLCA in the standing and supine positions (Δ%MA and ΔJLCA, respectively) was calculated by subtracting the measurement value in the supine position from that in the standing position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative %MAst, %MAsp, JLCAst, and JLCAsp were 23.8 ± 9.5%, 28.7 ± 8.0%, 2.9 ± 1.4°, and 1.6 ± 1.4° respectively. The preoperative Δ%MA and ΔJLCA were - 4.9 ± 5.9% and 1.3 ± 1.0° respectively. The postoperative %MAst, %MAsp, JLCAst, and JLCAsp were 58.8 ± 6.9%, 59.0 ± 6.2%, 1.7 ± 1.0°, and 1.5 ± 1.1°, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the postoperative %MAst and %MAsp. The postoperative Δ%MA and ΔJLCA were - 0.2 ± 3.0% and 0.3 ± 0.6°, respectively. The postoperative Δ%MA was - 5 to 5% in 68 knees (95.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimal differences were observed between the Δ%MA after HTO and DTO among patients with preoperative JLCAst of < 6° and ΔJLCA and of < 3°, respectively. Appropriate surgical indications could minimize this difference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05711-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05711-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估高位胫骨截骨术(HTO)或远端结节截骨术(DTO)患者站立和仰卧位机械轴(MA)在关节线会聚角(JLCA)手术指征上的差异。结果:术前MAst、MAsp、JLCAst、JLCAsp的%分别为23.8±9.5%、28.7±8.0%、2.9±1.4°、1.6±1.4°。术前Δ%MA为- 4.9±5.9%,ΔJLCA为1.3±1.0°。术后%MAst、%MAsp、JLCAst、JLCAsp分别为58.8±6.9%、59.0±6.2%、1.7±1.0°、1.5±1.1°。术后%MAst和%MAsp无显著差异。术后Δ%MA为- 0.2±3.0%,ΔJLCA为0.3±0.6°。68个膝关节(95.8%)术后Δ%MA为- 5 ~ 5%。结论:术前JLCAst患者HTO与DTO术后Δ%MA差异极小
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appropriate patient selection based on joint line convergence angle minimizes the difference between the mechanical axis in the standing and supine positions after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and distal tuberosity osteotomy.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the differences between the mechanical axis (MA) in standing and supine positions in patients who underwent high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or distal tuberosity osteotomy (DTO) based on the surgical indication for the joint line convergence angle (JLCA).

Methods: Seventy-one knees of 69 patients with JLCA of < 6° in standing position and a difference of < 3° between the JLCA in the standing and supine positions who had undergone medial open-wedge HTO or DTO were included in this study. The %MA in the standing and supine positions (%MAst and %MAsp, respectively) and JLCA in the standing and supine positions (JLCAst and JLCAsp, respectively) were determined using preoperative and postoperative long-leg-view radiographs. The difference between %MA and JLCA in the standing and supine positions (Δ%MA and ΔJLCA, respectively) was calculated by subtracting the measurement value in the supine position from that in the standing position.

Results: The preoperative %MAst, %MAsp, JLCAst, and JLCAsp were 23.8 ± 9.5%, 28.7 ± 8.0%, 2.9 ± 1.4°, and 1.6 ± 1.4° respectively. The preoperative Δ%MA and ΔJLCA were - 4.9 ± 5.9% and 1.3 ± 1.0° respectively. The postoperative %MAst, %MAsp, JLCAst, and JLCAsp were 58.8 ± 6.9%, 59.0 ± 6.2%, 1.7 ± 1.0°, and 1.5 ± 1.1°, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the postoperative %MAst and %MAsp. The postoperative Δ%MA and ΔJLCA were - 0.2 ± 3.0% and 0.3 ± 0.6°, respectively. The postoperative Δ%MA was - 5 to 5% in 68 knees (95.8%).

Conclusion: Minimal differences were observed between the Δ%MA after HTO and DTO among patients with preoperative JLCAst of < 6° and ΔJLCA and of < 3°, respectively. Appropriate surgical indications could minimize this difference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信