John M Campbell, Peter T White, Adam J Bograd, Alexander S Farivar, Candice L Wilshire, Eric Vallières, Brian E Louie
{"title":"大于五厘米胸腺瘤机器人切除术后的复发率和存活率","authors":"John M Campbell, Peter T White, Adam J Bograd, Alexander S Farivar, Candice L Wilshire, Eric Vallières, Brian E Louie","doi":"10.1002/jso.28098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and methods: </strong>Minimally invasive large thymoma resection remains controversial given the paucity of long-term oncological outcomes. We described the recurrence and survival of patients with thymomas ≥ 5 cm resected robotically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive thymoma resections between January 2006 and December 2022 were reviewed. Thymic carcinoma/neuroendocrine tumors, induction therapy treatment, and Stage IV disease were excluded. For thymomas ≥ 5 cm, open versus robotic resections were compared. With robotic resections, thymomas ≥/< 5 cm were compared. The outcomes were freedom from recurrence (FFR) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40 thymomas ≥ 5 cm (15 open and 25 robotic) and 52 robotic thymoma < 5 cm resections. Median follow-up was 5 years with 4 (4%) patients having recurrences and 5 (5%) demised. In thymomas ≥ 5 cm, patients were similar, except for higher comorbidities in the open cohort. Five-year FFR (p = 0.42) and OS (p = 0.34) were comparable. Patients with robotic resection of thymomas ≥/< 5 cm were similar, except those < 5 cm were more frequently Masaoka-Koga Stage II. Five-year FFR (p = 0.62) and OS (p = 0.62) were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resectable large thymomas, ≥ 5 cm, can be approached robotically with similar recurrence and survival when compared to open or smaller robotic resections. In otherwise appropriate thymomas, considerations such as location and proximity to surrounding structures, over size alone, should guide the approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence and Survival Following Robotic Resection of Thymomas Greater Than Five Centimeters.\",\"authors\":\"John M Campbell, Peter T White, Adam J Bograd, Alexander S Farivar, Candice L Wilshire, Eric Vallières, Brian E Louie\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and methods: </strong>Minimally invasive large thymoma resection remains controversial given the paucity of long-term oncological outcomes. We described the recurrence and survival of patients with thymomas ≥ 5 cm resected robotically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive thymoma resections between January 2006 and December 2022 were reviewed. Thymic carcinoma/neuroendocrine tumors, induction therapy treatment, and Stage IV disease were excluded. For thymomas ≥ 5 cm, open versus robotic resections were compared. With robotic resections, thymomas ≥/< 5 cm were compared. The outcomes were freedom from recurrence (FFR) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40 thymomas ≥ 5 cm (15 open and 25 robotic) and 52 robotic thymoma < 5 cm resections. Median follow-up was 5 years with 4 (4%) patients having recurrences and 5 (5%) demised. In thymomas ≥ 5 cm, patients were similar, except for higher comorbidities in the open cohort. Five-year FFR (p = 0.42) and OS (p = 0.34) were comparable. Patients with robotic resection of thymomas ≥/< 5 cm were similar, except those < 5 cm were more frequently Masaoka-Koga Stage II. Five-year FFR (p = 0.62) and OS (p = 0.62) were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resectable large thymomas, ≥ 5 cm, can be approached robotically with similar recurrence and survival when compared to open or smaller robotic resections. In otherwise appropriate thymomas, considerations such as location and proximity to surrounding structures, over size alone, should guide the approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28098\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recurrence and Survival Following Robotic Resection of Thymomas Greater Than Five Centimeters.
Background and methods: Minimally invasive large thymoma resection remains controversial given the paucity of long-term oncological outcomes. We described the recurrence and survival of patients with thymomas ≥ 5 cm resected robotically.
Methods: Consecutive thymoma resections between January 2006 and December 2022 were reviewed. Thymic carcinoma/neuroendocrine tumors, induction therapy treatment, and Stage IV disease were excluded. For thymomas ≥ 5 cm, open versus robotic resections were compared. With robotic resections, thymomas ≥/< 5 cm were compared. The outcomes were freedom from recurrence (FFR) and overall survival (OS).
Results: There were 40 thymomas ≥ 5 cm (15 open and 25 robotic) and 52 robotic thymoma < 5 cm resections. Median follow-up was 5 years with 4 (4%) patients having recurrences and 5 (5%) demised. In thymomas ≥ 5 cm, patients were similar, except for higher comorbidities in the open cohort. Five-year FFR (p = 0.42) and OS (p = 0.34) were comparable. Patients with robotic resection of thymomas ≥/< 5 cm were similar, except those < 5 cm were more frequently Masaoka-Koga Stage II. Five-year FFR (p = 0.62) and OS (p = 0.62) were similar.
Conclusions: Resectable large thymomas, ≥ 5 cm, can be approached robotically with similar recurrence and survival when compared to open or smaller robotic resections. In otherwise appropriate thymomas, considerations such as location and proximity to surrounding structures, over size alone, should guide the approach.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.