2016年至2021年癌症疼痛门诊阿片类药物处方趋势

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Sonal Admane, Patricia S Bramati, Bryan Fellman, Ali Rizvi, Evelin Kolenc, Annie Berly, Aline Rozman de Moraes, David Hui, Ali Haider, Eduardo Bruera
{"title":"2016年至2021年癌症疼痛门诊阿片类药物处方趋势","authors":"Sonal Admane, Patricia S Bramati, Bryan Fellman, Ali Rizvi, Evelin Kolenc, Annie Berly, Aline Rozman de Moraes, David Hui, Ali Haider, Eduardo Bruera","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Increasing opioid regulations have resulted in reduced opioid prescriptions, including for cancer pain, despite guideline exemptions. Data after 2017 following the Centers for Disease Control's 2016 pain management guidelines are limited on opioid prescribing practices of oncologists. The purpose of this study was to examine the trend in dose of opioids prescribed by oncologists to patients with cancer pain referred to outpatient palliative care between 2016 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center's outpatient palliative care clinic including 375 adult patients referred for initial consultation for cancer pain between 2016 and 2021. The main outcome was the trend in prescribed opioid doses, expressed as morphine-equivalent daily dose in mg/day. Additional analyses were conducted to identify predictors of opioid prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age (range) was 61 (19-85), 50% were women, 67% were non-Hispanic White, 80% had advanced cancer, and 91% reported proficiency in English. Ninety-five percent had solid tumors, predominantly GI (22%), breast (15%), and genitourinary (14%). From 2016 to 2021, the median dose of opioids decreased from 37.5 to 7.5 (<i>P</i> < .001). The proportion of patients on long-acting opioid decreased from 26% to 12% (<i>P</i> = .019), whereas that of patients without opioids increased from 28% to 41% (<i>P</i> = .008). CAGE-AID score (reflecting potential for substance abuse; β Coefficient, 43.2 [95% CI, 23.3 to 63.2], <i>P</i> < .001) and pain on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (5.77 [95% CI, 2.6 to 8.9], <i>P</i> < .001) predicted higher opioid dose, whereas non-English language predicted lower dose (-26.9 [95% CI, -53.1 to -0.8], <i>P</i> = .043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the study period, we observed a five-fold decline in opioid dose prescribed by oncologists for cancer pain. This raises concerns for undertreatment of pain in patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400782"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Outpatient Opioid Prescriptions for Cancer Pain Between 2016 and 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Sonal Admane, Patricia S Bramati, Bryan Fellman, Ali Rizvi, Evelin Kolenc, Annie Berly, Aline Rozman de Moraes, David Hui, Ali Haider, Eduardo Bruera\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP-24-00782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Increasing opioid regulations have resulted in reduced opioid prescriptions, including for cancer pain, despite guideline exemptions. Data after 2017 following the Centers for Disease Control's 2016 pain management guidelines are limited on opioid prescribing practices of oncologists. The purpose of this study was to examine the trend in dose of opioids prescribed by oncologists to patients with cancer pain referred to outpatient palliative care between 2016 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center's outpatient palliative care clinic including 375 adult patients referred for initial consultation for cancer pain between 2016 and 2021. The main outcome was the trend in prescribed opioid doses, expressed as morphine-equivalent daily dose in mg/day. Additional analyses were conducted to identify predictors of opioid prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age (range) was 61 (19-85), 50% were women, 67% were non-Hispanic White, 80% had advanced cancer, and 91% reported proficiency in English. Ninety-five percent had solid tumors, predominantly GI (22%), breast (15%), and genitourinary (14%). From 2016 to 2021, the median dose of opioids decreased from 37.5 to 7.5 (<i>P</i> < .001). The proportion of patients on long-acting opioid decreased from 26% to 12% (<i>P</i> = .019), whereas that of patients without opioids increased from 28% to 41% (<i>P</i> = .008). CAGE-AID score (reflecting potential for substance abuse; β Coefficient, 43.2 [95% CI, 23.3 to 63.2], <i>P</i> < .001) and pain on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (5.77 [95% CI, 2.6 to 8.9], <i>P</i> < .001) predicted higher opioid dose, whereas non-English language predicted lower dose (-26.9 [95% CI, -53.1 to -0.8], <i>P</i> = .043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the study period, we observed a five-fold decline in opioid dose prescribed by oncologists for cancer pain. This raises concerns for undertreatment of pain in patients with cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"OP2400782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管有指南豁免,但越来越多的阿片类药物监管导致阿片类药物处方减少,包括用于癌症疼痛的阿片类药物。根据疾病控制中心2016年疼痛管理指南,2017年之后的数据仅限于肿瘤学家的阿片类药物处方实践。本研究的目的是研究2016年至2021年期间肿瘤学家给门诊姑息治疗的癌症疼痛患者开的阿片类药物剂量的趋势。方法:在一家三级癌症中心的门诊姑息治疗诊所进行了一项单中心、横断面、回顾性研究,包括2016年至2021年间因癌症疼痛首次就诊的375名成年患者。主要结果是处方阿片类药物剂量的趋势,以吗啡当量日剂量(mg/天)表示。还进行了其他分析,以确定阿片类药物处方的预测因素。结果:中位年龄(范围)为61岁(19-85岁),50%为女性,67%为非西班牙裔白人,80%为晚期癌症,91%报告英语熟练程度。95%的人患有实体瘤,主要是胃肠道(22%)、乳腺(15%)和泌尿生殖系统(14%)。从2016年到2021年,阿片类药物的中位剂量从37.5降至7.5 (P < 0.001)。使用长效阿片类药物的患者比例从26%下降到12% (P = 0.019),未使用长效阿片类药物的患者比例从28%上升到41% (P = 0.008)。CAGE-AID评分(反映药物滥用的可能性;β系数为43.2 [95% CI, 23.3至63.2],P < 0.001),埃德蒙顿症状评估量表疼痛(5.77 [95% CI, 2.6至8.9],P < 0.001)预测阿片类药物剂量较高,而非英语语言预测阿片类药物剂量较低(-26.9 [95% CI, -53.1至-0.8],P = 0.043)。结论:在研究期间,我们观察到肿瘤学家为癌症疼痛开出的阿片类药物剂量下降了五倍。这引起了人们对癌症患者疼痛治疗不足的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Outpatient Opioid Prescriptions for Cancer Pain Between 2016 and 2021.

Purpose: Increasing opioid regulations have resulted in reduced opioid prescriptions, including for cancer pain, despite guideline exemptions. Data after 2017 following the Centers for Disease Control's 2016 pain management guidelines are limited on opioid prescribing practices of oncologists. The purpose of this study was to examine the trend in dose of opioids prescribed by oncologists to patients with cancer pain referred to outpatient palliative care between 2016 and 2021.

Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center's outpatient palliative care clinic including 375 adult patients referred for initial consultation for cancer pain between 2016 and 2021. The main outcome was the trend in prescribed opioid doses, expressed as morphine-equivalent daily dose in mg/day. Additional analyses were conducted to identify predictors of opioid prescriptions.

Results: The median age (range) was 61 (19-85), 50% were women, 67% were non-Hispanic White, 80% had advanced cancer, and 91% reported proficiency in English. Ninety-five percent had solid tumors, predominantly GI (22%), breast (15%), and genitourinary (14%). From 2016 to 2021, the median dose of opioids decreased from 37.5 to 7.5 (P < .001). The proportion of patients on long-acting opioid decreased from 26% to 12% (P = .019), whereas that of patients without opioids increased from 28% to 41% (P = .008). CAGE-AID score (reflecting potential for substance abuse; β Coefficient, 43.2 [95% CI, 23.3 to 63.2], P < .001) and pain on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (5.77 [95% CI, 2.6 to 8.9], P < .001) predicted higher opioid dose, whereas non-English language predicted lower dose (-26.9 [95% CI, -53.1 to -0.8], P = .043).

Conclusion: During the study period, we observed a five-fold decline in opioid dose prescribed by oncologists for cancer pain. This raises concerns for undertreatment of pain in patients with cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信