术前TEGAFIRI方案的放化疗在局部晚期直肠癌中取得了显著的局部控制。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shigenobu Emoto, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Oba, Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Shinya Abe, Kensuke Kaneko, Yuzo Nagai, Takahide Shinagawa, Yuichi Tachikawa, Satoshi Okada, Soichiro Ishihara
{"title":"术前TEGAFIRI方案的放化疗在局部晚期直肠癌中取得了显著的局部控制。","authors":"Shigenobu Emoto, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Oba, Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Shinya Abe, Kensuke Kaneko, Yuzo Nagai, Takahide Shinagawa, Yuichi Tachikawa, Satoshi Okada, Soichiro Ishihara","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04867-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate both the short- and long-term outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using the tegafur-uracil/calcium folinate/irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) regimen in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). While total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is becoming more common, CRT may still be the optimal approach in certain cases to improve prognosis and reduce adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic primary adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum treated with preoperative CRT using the TEGAFIRI regimen (TEGAFIRI group). The control group comprised patients treated with tegafur-uracil/calcium folinate (UFT group). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The background was adjusted using inverse probability weighting (IPW) calculated with the propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TEGAFIRI group consisted of 79 patients, while the UFT group included 264. The standardized pCR rates through the IPW were as follows: TEGAFIRI group: 24.3%, UFT group: 8.8%, and the difference in pCR was 15.4% (P = 0.01). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 15.2% vs. 8.7% (adjusted) (13.6% vs. 9.1% crude) in the TEGAFIRI group and the UFT group. The standardized LRFS was significantly higher in the TEGAFIRI group (HR = 0.39, (95% CI 0.16-0.98), P = 0.045). There were no significant differences in OS, DFS, or DRFS between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEGAFIRI regimen for preoperative CRT in LARC demonstrated a high pCR rate and reduced local recurrence, with manageable adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with the TEGAFIRI regimen achieves significant local control in locally advanced rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Shigenobu Emoto, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Oba, Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Shinya Abe, Kensuke Kaneko, Yuzo Nagai, Takahide Shinagawa, Yuichi Tachikawa, Satoshi Okada, Soichiro Ishihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00384-025-04867-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate both the short- and long-term outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using the tegafur-uracil/calcium folinate/irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) regimen in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). While total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is becoming more common, CRT may still be the optimal approach in certain cases to improve prognosis and reduce adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic primary adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum treated with preoperative CRT using the TEGAFIRI regimen (TEGAFIRI group). The control group comprised patients treated with tegafur-uracil/calcium folinate (UFT group). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The background was adjusted using inverse probability weighting (IPW) calculated with the propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TEGAFIRI group consisted of 79 patients, while the UFT group included 264. The standardized pCR rates through the IPW were as follows: TEGAFIRI group: 24.3%, UFT group: 8.8%, and the difference in pCR was 15.4% (P = 0.01). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 15.2% vs. 8.7% (adjusted) (13.6% vs. 9.1% crude) in the TEGAFIRI group and the UFT group. The standardized LRFS was significantly higher in the TEGAFIRI group (HR = 0.39, (95% CI 0.16-0.98), P = 0.045). There were no significant differences in OS, DFS, or DRFS between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEGAFIRI regimen for preoperative CRT in LARC demonstrated a high pCR rate and reduced local recurrence, with manageable adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11946991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04867-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04867-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者术前化疗(CRT)使用替加富-尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙/伊立替康(TEGAFIRI)方案的短期和长期结果。虽然全新辅助治疗(TNT)变得越来越普遍,CRT可能仍然是某些情况下改善预后和减少不良事件的最佳方法。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究纳入组织学证实的下直肠非转移性原发性腺癌患者,术前使用TEGAFIRI方案(TEGAFIRI组)进行CRT治疗。对照组为替加福-尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙治疗组。主要终点为病理完全缓解(pCR)率。次要终点包括不良事件、总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、远端无复发生存期(DRFS)和局部无复发生存期(LRFS)。利用倾向性评分计算的逆概率加权(IPW)调整背景。结果:TEGAFIRI组79例,UFT组264例。IPW标准化pCR率分别为:TEGAFIRI组为24.3%,UFT组为8.8%,pCR差异为15.4% (P = 0.01)。在TEGAFIRI组和UFT组中,出现3级或以上不良事件的比例分别为15.2%和8.7%(校正后)(13.6%和9.1%)。TEGAFIRI组的标准化LRFS显著高于对照组(HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.98, P = 0.045)。两组间OS、DFS、DRFS均无显著差异。结论:TEGAFIRI方案在LARC术前CRT中显示出高pCR率和减少局部复发率,不良事件可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with the TEGAFIRI regimen achieves significant local control in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate both the short- and long-term outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using the tegafur-uracil/calcium folinate/irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) regimen in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). While total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is becoming more common, CRT may still be the optimal approach in certain cases to improve prognosis and reduce adverse events.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic primary adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum treated with preoperative CRT using the TEGAFIRI regimen (TEGAFIRI group). The control group comprised patients treated with tegafur-uracil/calcium folinate (UFT group). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The background was adjusted using inverse probability weighting (IPW) calculated with the propensity score.

Results: The TEGAFIRI group consisted of 79 patients, while the UFT group included 264. The standardized pCR rates through the IPW were as follows: TEGAFIRI group: 24.3%, UFT group: 8.8%, and the difference in pCR was 15.4% (P = 0.01). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 15.2% vs. 8.7% (adjusted) (13.6% vs. 9.1% crude) in the TEGAFIRI group and the UFT group. The standardized LRFS was significantly higher in the TEGAFIRI group (HR = 0.39, (95% CI 0.16-0.98), P = 0.045). There were no significant differences in OS, DFS, or DRFS between groups.

Conclusions: The TEGAFIRI regimen for preoperative CRT in LARC demonstrated a high pCR rate and reduced local recurrence, with manageable adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信