根据用于认知储备操作的生活经历的变化,调查阿尔茨海默氏症的诊断和存活风险。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Kerry A Howard, Lauren M Massimo, Brian Witrick, Lu Zhang, Sarah F Griffin, Lesley A Ross, Lior Rennert
{"title":"根据用于认知储备操作的生活经历的变化,调查阿尔茨海默氏症的诊断和存活风险。","authors":"Kerry A Howard, Lauren M Massimo, Brian Witrick, Lu Zhang, Sarah F Griffin, Lesley A Ross, Lior Rennert","doi":"10.1177/13872877251326818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlzheimer's disease dementia (AD) is a debilitating progressive neurodegenerative disease. Life experiences are hypothesized to build cognitive reserve (CR), a theoretical construct associated with delayed onset of AD symptoms. While CR is a key moderator of cognitive decline, operationalization of CR is varied resulting in inconsistencies within the literature.ObjectiveThis study explored the relationship between life experiences used as proxies of CR and risk of AD diagnosis and death following diagnosis.MethodsWe explored results based on 30 different published CR operationalizations, including two standardized questionnaires and an investigator-developed lifecourse indicator. Using data from the Memory and Aging Project, we applied Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of operationalization on time to outcomes.ResultsHazard ratios, indicating instantaneous risk of AD or death for a standard deviation increase in the CR proxy utilized as a predictor, ranged from 0.80-1.40 for AD diagnosis and 0.80-1.29 for death following diagnosis. Among nine predictors that showed a significant reduction in risk of AD, there was a decrease of between 12% and 20%. Two predictors were associated with reduced risk of death, with 13%-20% reduction, while three predictors were associated with 18%-22% heightened risk of death following diagnosis.ConclusionsModel results were highly sensitive to CR operationalization. Based on the variation in results, composite measures that incorporate multiple lifecourse variables may still be the most comprehensive and faithful representation of CR. Attention to methodology and refining of measurement are needed to make use of CR and promote healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251326818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of risk of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and survival based on variation to life experiences used to operationalize cognitive reserve.\",\"authors\":\"Kerry A Howard, Lauren M Massimo, Brian Witrick, Lu Zhang, Sarah F Griffin, Lesley A Ross, Lior Rennert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251326818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAlzheimer's disease dementia (AD) is a debilitating progressive neurodegenerative disease. Life experiences are hypothesized to build cognitive reserve (CR), a theoretical construct associated with delayed onset of AD symptoms. While CR is a key moderator of cognitive decline, operationalization of CR is varied resulting in inconsistencies within the literature.ObjectiveThis study explored the relationship between life experiences used as proxies of CR and risk of AD diagnosis and death following diagnosis.MethodsWe explored results based on 30 different published CR operationalizations, including two standardized questionnaires and an investigator-developed lifecourse indicator. Using data from the Memory and Aging Project, we applied Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of operationalization on time to outcomes.ResultsHazard ratios, indicating instantaneous risk of AD or death for a standard deviation increase in the CR proxy utilized as a predictor, ranged from 0.80-1.40 for AD diagnosis and 0.80-1.29 for death following diagnosis. Among nine predictors that showed a significant reduction in risk of AD, there was a decrease of between 12% and 20%. Two predictors were associated with reduced risk of death, with 13%-20% reduction, while three predictors were associated with 18%-22% heightened risk of death following diagnosis.ConclusionsModel results were highly sensitive to CR operationalization. Based on the variation in results, composite measures that incorporate multiple lifecourse variables may still be the most comprehensive and faithful representation of CR. Attention to methodology and refining of measurement are needed to make use of CR and promote healthy aging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251326818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251326818\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251326818","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔茨海默病痴呆症(AD)是一种使人衰弱的进行性神经退行性疾病。生活经历被假设为建立认知储备(CR),这是一种与阿尔茨海默病症状延迟发作相关的理论结构。虽然CR是认知衰退的关键调节因素,但CR的操作方式各不相同,导致文献中的不一致。目的探讨生活经历与AD诊断风险及诊断后死亡之间的关系。方法研究了30种不同的已发表的CR操作方法,包括两份标准化问卷和研究者开发的生命历程指标。使用来自记忆和衰老项目的数据,我们应用Cox比例风险模型来评估操作化对结果时间的影响。结果:作为预测指标的CR指标,表明AD或死亡的瞬时风险标准差增加的风险比,AD诊断为0.80-1.40,诊断后死亡为0.80-1.29。在显示阿尔茨海默病风险显著降低的9个预测因素中,下降幅度在12%至20%之间。两个预测因子与死亡风险降低相关,降低13%-20%,而三个预测因子与诊断后死亡风险增加18%-22%相关。结论模型结果对CR操作化高度敏感。基于结果的差异性,包含多个生命过程变量的复合测量方法可能仍是最全面、最真实的CR表征,要充分利用CR,促进健康老龄化,还需注意方法和测量方法的完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of risk of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and survival based on variation to life experiences used to operationalize cognitive reserve.

BackgroundAlzheimer's disease dementia (AD) is a debilitating progressive neurodegenerative disease. Life experiences are hypothesized to build cognitive reserve (CR), a theoretical construct associated with delayed onset of AD symptoms. While CR is a key moderator of cognitive decline, operationalization of CR is varied resulting in inconsistencies within the literature.ObjectiveThis study explored the relationship between life experiences used as proxies of CR and risk of AD diagnosis and death following diagnosis.MethodsWe explored results based on 30 different published CR operationalizations, including two standardized questionnaires and an investigator-developed lifecourse indicator. Using data from the Memory and Aging Project, we applied Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of operationalization on time to outcomes.ResultsHazard ratios, indicating instantaneous risk of AD or death for a standard deviation increase in the CR proxy utilized as a predictor, ranged from 0.80-1.40 for AD diagnosis and 0.80-1.29 for death following diagnosis. Among nine predictors that showed a significant reduction in risk of AD, there was a decrease of between 12% and 20%. Two predictors were associated with reduced risk of death, with 13%-20% reduction, while three predictors were associated with 18%-22% heightened risk of death following diagnosis.ConclusionsModel results were highly sensitive to CR operationalization. Based on the variation in results, composite measures that incorporate multiple lifecourse variables may still be the most comprehensive and faithful representation of CR. Attention to methodology and refining of measurement are needed to make use of CR and promote healthy aging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信