一项全国性多中心研究:溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤的扩展结肠切除术和节段结肠切除术预后获益的差异

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ryo Seishima, Koji Okabayashi, Jun Okui, Yasunori Sato, Tatsuki Noguchi, Kenichi Sugihara, Yoichi Ajioka, Soichiro Ishihara
{"title":"一项全国性多中心研究:溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤的扩展结肠切除术和节段结肠切除术预后获益的差异","authors":"Ryo Seishima, Koji Okabayashi, Jun Okui, Yasunori Sato, Tatsuki Noguchi, Kenichi Sugihara, Yoichi Ajioka, Soichiro Ishihara","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended colectomy is considered standard treatment for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis, but there is limited supporting evidence, particularly from large-scale studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prognostic benefits of extended colectomy in patients with neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis using a nationwide database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Forty-three institutions in Japan participated in this study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with ulcerative colitis diagnosed with intestinal neoplasia between 1983 and 2020 at 43 institutions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed based on different surgical procedures, with a subgroup analysis comparing neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis to sporadic cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 879 patients, 801 were diagnosed with neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis and 78 with sporadic cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival for total proctocolectomy and subtotal colectomy were similar (87.8% and 83.9%), both superior to segmental colectomy (72.0%). When comparing neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis to sporadic cancer, extended colectomy (total proctocolectomy and subtotal colectomy) showed significantly better outcomes for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis, while no significant difference was observed for sporadic cancer. Multivariable analysis revealed a significantly better prognosis for extended colectomy compared to segmental colectomy in neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis patients, both in overall survival and disease-free survival (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Nonrandomized retrospective study design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide cohort study supports extended colectomy as the gold standard for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis management and underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis to distinguish between neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis and sporadic cancer for optimal treatment decisions. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference in the Prognostic Benefit Between Extended and Segmental Colectomy for Patients With Neoplasia Associated With Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Seishima, Koji Okabayashi, Jun Okui, Yasunori Sato, Tatsuki Noguchi, Kenichi Sugihara, Yoichi Ajioka, Soichiro Ishihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended colectomy is considered standard treatment for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis, but there is limited supporting evidence, particularly from large-scale studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prognostic benefits of extended colectomy in patients with neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis using a nationwide database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Forty-three institutions in Japan participated in this study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with ulcerative colitis diagnosed with intestinal neoplasia between 1983 and 2020 at 43 institutions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed based on different surgical procedures, with a subgroup analysis comparing neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis to sporadic cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 879 patients, 801 were diagnosed with neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis and 78 with sporadic cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival for total proctocolectomy and subtotal colectomy were similar (87.8% and 83.9%), both superior to segmental colectomy (72.0%). When comparing neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis to sporadic cancer, extended colectomy (total proctocolectomy and subtotal colectomy) showed significantly better outcomes for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis, while no significant difference was observed for sporadic cancer. Multivariable analysis revealed a significantly better prognosis for extended colectomy compared to segmental colectomy in neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis patients, both in overall survival and disease-free survival (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Nonrandomized retrospective study design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide cohort study supports extended colectomy as the gold standard for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis management and underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis to distinguish between neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis and sporadic cancer for optimal treatment decisions. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003662\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扩大结肠切除术被认为是溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤的标准治疗方法,但支持证据有限,特别是来自大规模研究的证据。目的:本研究旨在利用全国数据库评估溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤患者扩大结肠切除术的预后益处。设计:多中心回顾性研究。背景:日本共有43家机构参与本研究。患者:分析1983 ~ 2020年43家机构诊断为肠道肿瘤的溃疡性结肠炎患者。主要结局指标:基于不同手术方式评估5年总生存期和无病生存期,并通过亚组分析比较溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤与散发性癌症。结果:在879例患者中,801例诊断为溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤,78例诊断为散发性癌症。全直结肠切除术和次全结肠切除术的5年无病生存率相似(87.8%和83.9%),均优于节段性结肠切除术(72.0%)。当比较与溃疡性结肠炎相关的肿瘤与散发性癌症时,扩大结肠切除术(全直结肠切除术和次全结肠切除术)对溃疡性结肠炎相关的肿瘤的治疗效果明显更好,而散发性癌症的治疗效果无显著差异。多变量分析显示,在溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤患者中,无论是总生存期还是无病生存期,扩展结肠切除术的预后都明显优于节段结肠切除术(P < 0.001)。局限性:非随机回顾性研究设计。结论:这项全国性队列研究支持延长结肠切除术作为溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤治疗的金标准,并强调了准确诊断区分溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤和散发性癌症的重要性,以获得最佳治疗决策。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difference in the Prognostic Benefit Between Extended and Segmental Colectomy for Patients With Neoplasia Associated With Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Multicenter Study.

Background: Extended colectomy is considered standard treatment for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis, but there is limited supporting evidence, particularly from large-scale studies.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the prognostic benefits of extended colectomy in patients with neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis using a nationwide database.

Design: Multicenter retrospective study.

Settings: Forty-three institutions in Japan participated in this study.

Patients: Patients with ulcerative colitis diagnosed with intestinal neoplasia between 1983 and 2020 at 43 institutions were analyzed.

Main outcome measures: Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed based on different surgical procedures, with a subgroup analysis comparing neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis to sporadic cancer.

Results: Among 879 patients, 801 were diagnosed with neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis and 78 with sporadic cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival for total proctocolectomy and subtotal colectomy were similar (87.8% and 83.9%), both superior to segmental colectomy (72.0%). When comparing neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis to sporadic cancer, extended colectomy (total proctocolectomy and subtotal colectomy) showed significantly better outcomes for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis, while no significant difference was observed for sporadic cancer. Multivariable analysis revealed a significantly better prognosis for extended colectomy compared to segmental colectomy in neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis patients, both in overall survival and disease-free survival (P < 0.001).

Limitation: Nonrandomized retrospective study design.

Conclusion: This nationwide cohort study supports extended colectomy as the gold standard for neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis management and underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis to distinguish between neoplasia associated with ulcerative colitis and sporadic cancer for optimal treatment decisions. See Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信