系统综述:隐蔽性听力损失诊断的科学现状。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sunil Shenoy, Khushi Bhatt, Yalda Yazdani, Helia Rahimian, Hamid R Djalilian, Mehdi Abouzari
{"title":"系统综述:隐蔽性听力损失诊断的科学现状。","authors":"Sunil Shenoy, Khushi Bhatt, Yalda Yazdani, Helia Rahimian, Hamid R Djalilian, Mehdi Abouzari","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15060742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: A sizeable population of patients with normal pure-tone audiograms endorse a consistent difficulty of following conversations in noisy environments. Termed hidden hearing loss (HHL), this condition evades traditional diagnostic methods for hearing loss and thus is significantly under-diagnosed and untreated. This review sought to identify emerging methods of diagnosing HHL via measurement of its histopathologic correlate: cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of synapses in the auditory nerve pathway. <b>Methods</b>: A thorough literature search of multiple databases was conducted to identify studies with objective, electrophysiological measures of synaptopathy. The PRISMA protocol was employed to establish criteria for the selection of relevant literature. <b>Results</b>: A total of 21 studies were selected with diagnostic methods, including the auditory brainstem response (ABR), electrocochleography (EcochG), middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR), and frequency-following response (FFR). Measures that may indicate the presence of synaptopathy include a reduced wave I amplitude of ABR, reduced SP amplitude of EcochG, and abnormal MEMR, among other measurements. Behavioral measures were often performed alongside electrophysiological measures, the most common of which was the speech-in-noise assessment. <b>Conclusions</b>: ABR was the most common diagnostic method for assessing HHL. Though ABR, EcochG, and MEMR may be sensitive to measuring synaptopathy, more literature comparing these methods is necessary. A two-pronged approach combining behavioral and electrophysiological measures may prove useful as a criterion for diagnosing and estimating the extent of pathology in affected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review: State of the Science on Diagnostics of Hidden Hearing Loss.\",\"authors\":\"Sunil Shenoy, Khushi Bhatt, Yalda Yazdani, Helia Rahimian, Hamid R Djalilian, Mehdi Abouzari\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15060742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: A sizeable population of patients with normal pure-tone audiograms endorse a consistent difficulty of following conversations in noisy environments. Termed hidden hearing loss (HHL), this condition evades traditional diagnostic methods for hearing loss and thus is significantly under-diagnosed and untreated. This review sought to identify emerging methods of diagnosing HHL via measurement of its histopathologic correlate: cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of synapses in the auditory nerve pathway. <b>Methods</b>: A thorough literature search of multiple databases was conducted to identify studies with objective, electrophysiological measures of synaptopathy. The PRISMA protocol was employed to establish criteria for the selection of relevant literature. <b>Results</b>: A total of 21 studies were selected with diagnostic methods, including the auditory brainstem response (ABR), electrocochleography (EcochG), middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR), and frequency-following response (FFR). Measures that may indicate the presence of synaptopathy include a reduced wave I amplitude of ABR, reduced SP amplitude of EcochG, and abnormal MEMR, among other measurements. Behavioral measures were often performed alongside electrophysiological measures, the most common of which was the speech-in-noise assessment. <b>Conclusions</b>: ABR was the most common diagnostic method for assessing HHL. Though ABR, EcochG, and MEMR may be sensitive to measuring synaptopathy, more literature comparing these methods is necessary. A two-pronged approach combining behavioral and electrophysiological measures may prove useful as a criterion for diagnosing and estimating the extent of pathology in affected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060742\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:相当数量的纯音听力图正常的患者在嘈杂环境中表现出持续的对话困难。被称为隐性听力损失(HHL),这种情况逃避了传统的听力损失诊断方法,因此严重误诊和治疗不足。本综述旨在通过测量其组织病理学相关性来确定诊断HHL的新方法:耳蜗突触病,听神经通路中突触的丧失。方法:对多个数据库进行全面的文献检索,以确定具有客观的突触病电生理测量的研究。采用PRISMA方案建立相关文献的选择标准。结果:采用听觉脑干反应(ABR)、耳蜗电图(EcochG)、中耳肌肉反射(MEMR)、频率跟随反应(FFR)等诊断方法共选择21项研究。可能表明突触病存在的措施包括ABR的波I振幅降低,EcochG的SP振幅降低,以及异常的MEMR等测量。行为测量通常与电生理测量一起进行,其中最常见的是噪音语音评估。结论:ABR是评估HHL最常用的诊断方法。虽然ABR、EcochG和MEMR可能对突触病的测量敏感,但需要更多的文献对这些方法进行比较。结合行为和电生理测量的双管齐下的方法可能被证明是诊断和估计受影响患者病理程度的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review: State of the Science on Diagnostics of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Background/Objectives: A sizeable population of patients with normal pure-tone audiograms endorse a consistent difficulty of following conversations in noisy environments. Termed hidden hearing loss (HHL), this condition evades traditional diagnostic methods for hearing loss and thus is significantly under-diagnosed and untreated. This review sought to identify emerging methods of diagnosing HHL via measurement of its histopathologic correlate: cochlear synaptopathy, the loss of synapses in the auditory nerve pathway. Methods: A thorough literature search of multiple databases was conducted to identify studies with objective, electrophysiological measures of synaptopathy. The PRISMA protocol was employed to establish criteria for the selection of relevant literature. Results: A total of 21 studies were selected with diagnostic methods, including the auditory brainstem response (ABR), electrocochleography (EcochG), middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR), and frequency-following response (FFR). Measures that may indicate the presence of synaptopathy include a reduced wave I amplitude of ABR, reduced SP amplitude of EcochG, and abnormal MEMR, among other measurements. Behavioral measures were often performed alongside electrophysiological measures, the most common of which was the speech-in-noise assessment. Conclusions: ABR was the most common diagnostic method for assessing HHL. Though ABR, EcochG, and MEMR may be sensitive to measuring synaptopathy, more literature comparing these methods is necessary. A two-pronged approach combining behavioral and electrophysiological measures may prove useful as a criterion for diagnosing and estimating the extent of pathology in affected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信