常规CT影像特征与放射组学特征联合诊断1级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤与高级别胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的价值

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.3390/cancers17061047
Florent Tixier, Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Alejandra Blanco, Ammar A Javed, Linda C Chu, Ralph H Hruban, Mohammad Yasrab, Daniel Fadaei Fouladi, Shahab Shayesteh, Saeed Ghandili, Elliot K Fishman, Satomi Kawamoto
{"title":"常规CT影像特征与放射组学特征联合诊断1级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤与高级别胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的价值","authors":"Florent Tixier, Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Alejandra Blanco, Ammar A Javed, Linda C Chu, Ralph H Hruban, Mohammad Yasrab, Daniel Fadaei Fouladi, Shahab Shayesteh, Saeed Ghandili, Elliot K Fishman, Satomi Kawamoto","doi":"10.3390/cancers17061047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Accurate identification of grade 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is crucial due to their rising incidence and emerging nonsurgical management strategies. This study evaluated whether combining conventional CT imaging features, CT radiomics features, and clinical data improves differentiation of G1 PanNETs from higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas [PanNECs]) compared to using these features individually.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 133 patients with pathologically confirmed PanNETs or PanNECs (70 males, 63 females; mean age, 58.5 years) who underwent pancreas protocol CT. A total of 28 conventional imaging features, 4892 radiomics features, and clinical data (age, gender, and tumor location) were analyzed using a support vector machine (SVM) model. Data were divided into 70% training and 30% testing sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SVM model using the top 10 conventional imaging features (e.g., suspicious lymph nodes and hypoattenuating tumors) achieved 75% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 79% accuracy for identifying higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and PanNECs). The top 10 radiomics features yielded 94% sensitivity, 46% specificity, and 69% accuracy. Combining all features (imaging, radiomics, and clinical data) improved performance, with 94% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 79% accuracy, and an F1-score of 0.77. The radiomics score demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 in the training and 0.83 in the testing set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conventional imaging features provided higher specificity, while radiomics offered greater sensitivity for identifying higher-grade tumors. Integrating all three features improved diagnostic accuracy, highlighting their complementary roles. This combined model may serve as a valuable tool for distinguishing higher-grade tumors from G1 PanNETs and potentially guiding patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Combined Conventional CT Imaging Features and Radiomics Signature in Differentiating Grade 1 Tumors from Higher-Grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.\",\"authors\":\"Florent Tixier, Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Alejandra Blanco, Ammar A Javed, Linda C Chu, Ralph H Hruban, Mohammad Yasrab, Daniel Fadaei Fouladi, Shahab Shayesteh, Saeed Ghandili, Elliot K Fishman, Satomi Kawamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17061047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Accurate identification of grade 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is crucial due to their rising incidence and emerging nonsurgical management strategies. This study evaluated whether combining conventional CT imaging features, CT radiomics features, and clinical data improves differentiation of G1 PanNETs from higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas [PanNECs]) compared to using these features individually.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 133 patients with pathologically confirmed PanNETs or PanNECs (70 males, 63 females; mean age, 58.5 years) who underwent pancreas protocol CT. A total of 28 conventional imaging features, 4892 radiomics features, and clinical data (age, gender, and tumor location) were analyzed using a support vector machine (SVM) model. Data were divided into 70% training and 30% testing sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SVM model using the top 10 conventional imaging features (e.g., suspicious lymph nodes and hypoattenuating tumors) achieved 75% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 79% accuracy for identifying higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and PanNECs). The top 10 radiomics features yielded 94% sensitivity, 46% specificity, and 69% accuracy. Combining all features (imaging, radiomics, and clinical data) improved performance, with 94% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 79% accuracy, and an F1-score of 0.77. The radiomics score demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 in the training and 0.83 in the testing set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conventional imaging features provided higher specificity, while radiomics offered greater sensitivity for identifying higher-grade tumors. Integrating all three features improved diagnostic accuracy, highlighting their complementary roles. This combined model may serve as a valuable tool for distinguishing higher-grade tumors from G1 PanNETs and potentially guiding patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17061047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17061047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:由于1级(G1)胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PanNETs)的发病率上升和新兴的非手术治疗策略,准确识别PanNETs至关重要。本研究评估了与单独使用这些特征相比,结合常规CT影像学特征、CT放射组学特征和临床资料是否能改善G1 PanNETs与更高级别肿瘤(G2/G3 PanNETs和胰腺神经内分泌癌[PanNECs])的分化。方法:回顾性分析133例经病理证实的PanNETs或PanNECs患者(男性70例,女性63例;平均年龄58.5岁)。采用支持向量机(SVM)模型对28个常规影像学特征、4892个放射组学特征和临床数据(年龄、性别、肿瘤位置)进行分析。数据分为70%的训练集和30%的测试集。结果:使用前10个常规影像学特征(如可疑淋巴结和低衰减肿瘤)的SVM模型识别高级别肿瘤(G2/G3 PanNETs和PanNECs)的灵敏度为75%,特异性为81%,准确率为79%。前10名放射组学特征的灵敏度为94%,特异性为46%,准确性为69%。结合所有特征(影像学、放射组学和临床数据),提高了诊断效果,灵敏度为94%,特异性为69%,准确性为79%,f1评分为0.77。放射组学评分显示,训练组的AUC为0.85,测试组的AUC为0.83。结论:常规影像学特征具有更高的特异性,而放射组学对鉴别高级别肿瘤具有更高的敏感性。将这三个特征集成在一起,提高了诊断的准确性,突出了它们的互补作用。该组合模型可作为区分高级别肿瘤和G1 PanNETs的有价值工具,并可能指导患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Performance of Combined Conventional CT Imaging Features and Radiomics Signature in Differentiating Grade 1 Tumors from Higher-Grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Background/objectives: Accurate identification of grade 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is crucial due to their rising incidence and emerging nonsurgical management strategies. This study evaluated whether combining conventional CT imaging features, CT radiomics features, and clinical data improves differentiation of G1 PanNETs from higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas [PanNECs]) compared to using these features individually.

Methods: A retrospective analysis included 133 patients with pathologically confirmed PanNETs or PanNECs (70 males, 63 females; mean age, 58.5 years) who underwent pancreas protocol CT. A total of 28 conventional imaging features, 4892 radiomics features, and clinical data (age, gender, and tumor location) were analyzed using a support vector machine (SVM) model. Data were divided into 70% training and 30% testing sets.

Results: The SVM model using the top 10 conventional imaging features (e.g., suspicious lymph nodes and hypoattenuating tumors) achieved 75% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 79% accuracy for identifying higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and PanNECs). The top 10 radiomics features yielded 94% sensitivity, 46% specificity, and 69% accuracy. Combining all features (imaging, radiomics, and clinical data) improved performance, with 94% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 79% accuracy, and an F1-score of 0.77. The radiomics score demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 in the training and 0.83 in the testing set.

Conclusions: Conventional imaging features provided higher specificity, while radiomics offered greater sensitivity for identifying higher-grade tumors. Integrating all three features improved diagnostic accuracy, highlighting their complementary roles. This combined model may serve as a valuable tool for distinguishing higher-grade tumors from G1 PanNETs and potentially guiding patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信