Anahita Kate, Raksheeth N Rajagopal, Supriya Sharma, Sayan Basu, Swapna S Shanbhag
{"title":"急性眼烧伤后出现眼球边缘干细胞缺乏症的风险因素。","authors":"Anahita Kate, Raksheeth N Rajagopal, Supriya Sharma, Sayan Basu, Swapna S Shanbhag","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2025.2482059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the risk factors predictive of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in eyes with acute ocular burns (AOB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, comparative case series which included 112 eyes of 96 patients with AOB of severity > Dua grade II who had follow-up until complete epithelization. Data on injury details, clinical features, and treatment were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for (i) LSCD following AOB, (ii) LSCD >6 clock hours, and (iii) LSCD requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 112 eyes, 61 eyes (54%) of 56 patients developed LSCD. The final median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was poorer in eyes with LSCD [logMAR 0.9 (IQR: 0.5-1.5)] when compared to the non-LSCD group [logMAR 0.1 (IQR: 0-0.3); <i>p</i> < .00001]. Regression analysis revealed lime injury (OR: 7.5, <i>p</i> = .002), conjunctival defect of >50% area (OR = 7.6, <i>p</i> = .0001), limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours (OR = 3.5, <i>p</i> = .02), and undergoing repeat AMT (OR: 15.3, <i>p</i> = .01) to be risk factors for the development of LSCD. For \"LSCD of >6 clock hours\", both conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.5 (CI: 1.2-16.9), <i>p</i> = .03] and limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours [OR: 9.6 (CI: 1.9-48.6), <i>p</i> = .006] were significant risk factors; while for the outcome \"LSCD necessitating a surgical intervention\", conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.1 (CI: 1.2-13.6), <i>p</i> = .03] was a risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with lime injury, limbal epithelial defects, and conjunctival epithelial defects involving a larger area are at a higher risk of development of LSCD post AOB. Larger conjunctival defects indicate the development of more severe LSCD and a greater need for surgical intervention. Eyes with LSCD have poorer visual outcomes. Thus, preventing this entity by addressing the risk factors can alleviate the socioeconomic burden on the affected individuals and the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Development of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency After Acute Ocular Burns.\",\"authors\":\"Anahita Kate, Raksheeth N Rajagopal, Supriya Sharma, Sayan Basu, Swapna S Shanbhag\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02713683.2025.2482059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the risk factors predictive of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in eyes with acute ocular burns (AOB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, comparative case series which included 112 eyes of 96 patients with AOB of severity > Dua grade II who had follow-up until complete epithelization. Data on injury details, clinical features, and treatment were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for (i) LSCD following AOB, (ii) LSCD >6 clock hours, and (iii) LSCD requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 112 eyes, 61 eyes (54%) of 56 patients developed LSCD. The final median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was poorer in eyes with LSCD [logMAR 0.9 (IQR: 0.5-1.5)] when compared to the non-LSCD group [logMAR 0.1 (IQR: 0-0.3); <i>p</i> < .00001]. Regression analysis revealed lime injury (OR: 7.5, <i>p</i> = .002), conjunctival defect of >50% area (OR = 7.6, <i>p</i> = .0001), limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours (OR = 3.5, <i>p</i> = .02), and undergoing repeat AMT (OR: 15.3, <i>p</i> = .01) to be risk factors for the development of LSCD. For \\\"LSCD of >6 clock hours\\\", both conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.5 (CI: 1.2-16.9), <i>p</i> = .03] and limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours [OR: 9.6 (CI: 1.9-48.6), <i>p</i> = .006] were significant risk factors; while for the outcome \\\"LSCD necessitating a surgical intervention\\\", conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.1 (CI: 1.2-13.6), <i>p</i> = .03] was a risk factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with lime injury, limbal epithelial defects, and conjunctival epithelial defects involving a larger area are at a higher risk of development of LSCD post AOB. Larger conjunctival defects indicate the development of more severe LSCD and a greater need for surgical intervention. Eyes with LSCD have poorer visual outcomes. Thus, preventing this entity by addressing the risk factors can alleviate the socioeconomic burden on the affected individuals and the healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2482059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2482059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨急性眼部烧伤(AOB)患者角膜缘干细胞缺乏症(LSCD)发生的危险因素。方法:这是一个回顾性的、比较的病例系列,包括112眼96例严重程度为> Dua II级的AOB患者,随访至完全上皮化。收集了有关损伤细节、临床特征和治疗的数据。进行Logistic回归分析以确定(i) AOB后LSCD的危险因素,(ii) LSCD在60小时内,以及(iii) LSCD需要手术干预。结果:112眼56例,61眼(54%)发生LSCD。与非LSCD组相比,LSCD组[logMAR 0.9 (IQR: 0.5-1.5)]的最终中位最佳矫正视力(BCVA)较差[logMAR 0.1 (IQR: 0-0.3)];p = .002)、结膜缺损50% (OR = 7.6, p = .0001)、结膜缺损6小时(OR = 3.5, p = .02)和重复AMT (OR: 15.3, p = .01)是LSCD发生的危险因素。对于“LSCD of >6时钟小时”,两者结膜缺损50%面积[OR: 4.5 (CI: 1.2-16.9), p =。[03]和角膜缘上皮缺损[OR: 9.6 (CI: 1.9 ~ 48.6), p =。[2006]是显著的危险因素;而对于结果“LSCD需要手术干预”,结膜缺损面积为bb0 50% [OR: 4.1 (CI: 1.2-13.6), p =。[03]是一个危险因素。结论:骨缘损伤、角膜缘上皮缺损、结膜上皮缺损面积较大的患者在AOB后发生LSCD的风险较高。较大的结膜缺损表明LSCD的发展更严重,更需要手术干预。患有LSCD的眼睛视力较差。因此,通过解决风险因素来预防这种实体可以减轻受影响个人和医疗保健系统的社会经济负担。
Risk Factors for Development of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency After Acute Ocular Burns.
Purpose: To identify the risk factors predictive of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in eyes with acute ocular burns (AOB).
Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative case series which included 112 eyes of 96 patients with AOB of severity > Dua grade II who had follow-up until complete epithelization. Data on injury details, clinical features, and treatment were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for (i) LSCD following AOB, (ii) LSCD >6 clock hours, and (iii) LSCD requiring surgical intervention.
Results: Of the 112 eyes, 61 eyes (54%) of 56 patients developed LSCD. The final median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was poorer in eyes with LSCD [logMAR 0.9 (IQR: 0.5-1.5)] when compared to the non-LSCD group [logMAR 0.1 (IQR: 0-0.3); p < .00001]. Regression analysis revealed lime injury (OR: 7.5, p = .002), conjunctival defect of >50% area (OR = 7.6, p = .0001), limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours (OR = 3.5, p = .02), and undergoing repeat AMT (OR: 15.3, p = .01) to be risk factors for the development of LSCD. For "LSCD of >6 clock hours", both conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.5 (CI: 1.2-16.9), p = .03] and limbal epithelial defect of >6 clock hours [OR: 9.6 (CI: 1.9-48.6), p = .006] were significant risk factors; while for the outcome "LSCD necessitating a surgical intervention", conjunctival defect of >50% area [OR: 4.1 (CI: 1.2-13.6), p = .03] was a risk factor.
Conclusions: Patients with lime injury, limbal epithelial defects, and conjunctival epithelial defects involving a larger area are at a higher risk of development of LSCD post AOB. Larger conjunctival defects indicate the development of more severe LSCD and a greater need for surgical intervention. Eyes with LSCD have poorer visual outcomes. Thus, preventing this entity by addressing the risk factors can alleviate the socioeconomic burden on the affected individuals and the healthcare system.
期刊介绍:
The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.