三维解剖定量分析为导管动脉支架置入术规划提供依据。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mudit Gupta, Silvani Amin, Alana Cianciulli, Yuval Barak-Corren, Csaba Pinter, Hannah Dewey, Andras Lasso, William Russell, Stephanie Colello, Ari J Gartenberg, Vlad Obsekov, Trevor Williams, Elizabeth Silvestro, Michael L O'Byrne, Andrew C Glatz, Matthew A Jolley
{"title":"三维解剖定量分析为导管动脉支架置入术规划提供依据。","authors":"Mudit Gupta, Silvani Amin, Alana Cianciulli, Yuval Barak-Corren, Csaba Pinter, Hannah Dewey, Andras Lasso, William Russell, Stephanie Colello, Ari J Gartenberg, Vlad Obsekov, Trevor Williams, Elizabeth Silvestro, Michael L O'Byrne, Andrew C Glatz, Matthew A Jolley","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ductus arteriosus stenting (DAS) is used to palliate infants with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow (DD-PBF), however patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) anatomy can be complex and heterogenous.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We developed custom, open-source software to model and quantify PDA anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 33 neonates with DD-PBF with a CTA before DAS. A novel custom workflow was implemented in 3D Slicer and SlicerHeart to semi-automatically extract centerlines of the course of the PDA and surrounding vessels. 3D ductal length, diameter, curvature and tortuosity were automatically calculated (3D automatic) and compared to manually adjusted 3D measurements (3D semi-automatic), and manual measurements of PDA dimensions in 2D projectional angiograms before and after stent angioplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ductal anatomy was successfully modeled and quantified in all subjects. 3D automatic and semi-automatic measurements of straight-line aortic to pulmonary artery length were not significantly different than 2D measurements. Semi-automatic 3D measurements were similar to 2D measurements of the total length. Minimum and maximum ductal diameters were not significantly different by 3D automatic and 2D measurements, however semi-automatic 3D diameters were significantly larger. Inter-reader reliability of ductal length and diameter was higher with manual adjustment of 3D centerlines compared to standard measurement of 2D angiograms. These differences were consistent across PGE doses between CTA and DAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automatic PDA modeling is feasible and efficient, enabling reproducible quantification of ductal anatomy for procedural planning of DAS in patients with DD-PBF. Further development is needed as well as investigation of whether 3D modeling-derived measurements influence procedural duration or outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Analysis of 3D Anatomy to Inform Planning of Ductal Arteriosus Stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Mudit Gupta, Silvani Amin, Alana Cianciulli, Yuval Barak-Corren, Csaba Pinter, Hannah Dewey, Andras Lasso, William Russell, Stephanie Colello, Ari J Gartenberg, Vlad Obsekov, Trevor Williams, Elizabeth Silvestro, Michael L O'Byrne, Andrew C Glatz, Matthew A Jolley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ductus arteriosus stenting (DAS) is used to palliate infants with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow (DD-PBF), however patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) anatomy can be complex and heterogenous.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We developed custom, open-source software to model and quantify PDA anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 33 neonates with DD-PBF with a CTA before DAS. A novel custom workflow was implemented in 3D Slicer and SlicerHeart to semi-automatically extract centerlines of the course of the PDA and surrounding vessels. 3D ductal length, diameter, curvature and tortuosity were automatically calculated (3D automatic) and compared to manually adjusted 3D measurements (3D semi-automatic), and manual measurements of PDA dimensions in 2D projectional angiograms before and after stent angioplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ductal anatomy was successfully modeled and quantified in all subjects. 3D automatic and semi-automatic measurements of straight-line aortic to pulmonary artery length were not significantly different than 2D measurements. Semi-automatic 3D measurements were similar to 2D measurements of the total length. Minimum and maximum ductal diameters were not significantly different by 3D automatic and 2D measurements, however semi-automatic 3D diameters were significantly larger. Inter-reader reliability of ductal length and diameter was higher with manual adjustment of 3D centerlines compared to standard measurement of 2D angiograms. These differences were consistent across PGE doses between CTA and DAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automatic PDA modeling is feasible and efficient, enabling reproducible quantification of ductal anatomy for procedural planning of DAS in patients with DD-PBF. Further development is needed as well as investigation of whether 3D modeling-derived measurements influence procedural duration or outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31510\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:动脉导管支架(DAS)用于缓解婴儿导管依赖肺血流(DD-PBF),然而动脉导管未闭(PDA)的解剖结构可能是复杂和异质性的。目的:我们开发了定制的开源软件来建模和量化PDA解剖。方法:我们回顾性分析了33例新生儿DD-PBF,并在DAS前进行了CTA检查。在3D Slicer和SlicerHeart中实现了一种新颖的自定义工作流程,以半自动地提取PDA过程和周围血管的中心线。自动计算三维导管长度、直径、曲率和弯曲度(3D自动),并与人工调整三维测量(3D半自动)和人工测量支架成形术前后二维投影血管造影中PDA尺寸进行比较。结果:所有受试者的导管解剖成功建模和量化。三维自动和半自动测量的主动脉至肺动脉直线长度与二维测量无显著差异。半自动三维测量与二维测量的总长度相似。三维自动和二维测量的最小和最大导管直径差异不显著,但半自动三维测量的导管直径明显较大。与标准的二维血管造影测量相比,手动调整三维中心线测量导管长度和直径的阅读器间可靠性更高。这些差异在CTA和DAS的PGE剂量之间是一致的。结论:自动PDA建模是可行且高效的,为DD-PBF患者的DAS手术规划提供了可重复的导管解剖定量。需要进一步的发展,以及三维建模衍生的测量是否影响程序持续时间或结果的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Analysis of 3D Anatomy to Inform Planning of Ductal Arteriosus Stenting.

Background: Ductus arteriosus stenting (DAS) is used to palliate infants with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow (DD-PBF), however patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) anatomy can be complex and heterogenous.

Aims: We developed custom, open-source software to model and quantify PDA anatomy.

Methods: We retrospectively identified 33 neonates with DD-PBF with a CTA before DAS. A novel custom workflow was implemented in 3D Slicer and SlicerHeart to semi-automatically extract centerlines of the course of the PDA and surrounding vessels. 3D ductal length, diameter, curvature and tortuosity were automatically calculated (3D automatic) and compared to manually adjusted 3D measurements (3D semi-automatic), and manual measurements of PDA dimensions in 2D projectional angiograms before and after stent angioplasty.

Results: Ductal anatomy was successfully modeled and quantified in all subjects. 3D automatic and semi-automatic measurements of straight-line aortic to pulmonary artery length were not significantly different than 2D measurements. Semi-automatic 3D measurements were similar to 2D measurements of the total length. Minimum and maximum ductal diameters were not significantly different by 3D automatic and 2D measurements, however semi-automatic 3D diameters were significantly larger. Inter-reader reliability of ductal length and diameter was higher with manual adjustment of 3D centerlines compared to standard measurement of 2D angiograms. These differences were consistent across PGE doses between CTA and DAS.

Conclusions: Automatic PDA modeling is feasible and efficient, enabling reproducible quantification of ductal anatomy for procedural planning of DAS in patients with DD-PBF. Further development is needed as well as investigation of whether 3D modeling-derived measurements influence procedural duration or outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信