医院少报跌倒:韩国的一项多地点研究。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Insook Cho, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Whasuk Choe, Jiseon Cho, Sook Hyun Park, David W Bates
{"title":"医院少报跌倒:韩国的一项多地点研究。","authors":"Insook Cho, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Whasuk Choe, Jiseon Cho, Sook Hyun Park, David W Bates","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inpatient falls are adverse events that often result in injury due to complex interactions between the hospital environment and patient risk factors and remain a significant problem in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify (1) practice variations and key issues ranging from hospital fall management protocols to incident detection, and (2) potential approaches to address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four general hospitals in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed using the Donabedian quality outcomes model. Data were collected retrospectively during 2015-2023 from four general hospitals on local practice protocols, patient admission and nursing data from electronic records, and incident self-reports. Content analysis of practice protocol and manual chart reviews for hospital falls incidents was conducted at each site. Quantitative analyses of nursing activities and analysis of patient falls prevention interventions were also conducted at each site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were variations in fall definitions, risk-assessment tools and inclusion and exclusion criteria among the local fall management protocols. The original and modified versions of the heuristic tools performed poorly to moderately, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.54~0.74 and 0.59~0.80, respectively. Preventive intervention practices varied significantly among the sites, with risk-targeted and tailored interventions delivered to only 1.15%~49.5% of at-risk patients. Fall events were not recorded in self-reporting systems and nursing notes for 29.5%~90.6% and 4.4%~17.1% of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Challenges in fall prevention included weaknesses in the design and implementation of local fall protocols and low-quality incident self-reporting systems. Systematic and sustainable solutions are needed to help reduce hospital fall rates and injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under-reporting of falls in hospitals: a multisite study in South Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Insook Cho, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Whasuk Choe, Jiseon Cho, Sook Hyun Park, David W Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inpatient falls are adverse events that often result in injury due to complex interactions between the hospital environment and patient risk factors and remain a significant problem in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify (1) practice variations and key issues ranging from hospital fall management protocols to incident detection, and (2) potential approaches to address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four general hospitals in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed using the Donabedian quality outcomes model. Data were collected retrospectively during 2015-2023 from four general hospitals on local practice protocols, patient admission and nursing data from electronic records, and incident self-reports. Content analysis of practice protocol and manual chart reviews for hospital falls incidents was conducted at each site. Quantitative analyses of nursing activities and analysis of patient falls prevention interventions were also conducted at each site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were variations in fall definitions, risk-assessment tools and inclusion and exclusion criteria among the local fall management protocols. The original and modified versions of the heuristic tools performed poorly to moderately, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.54~0.74 and 0.59~0.80, respectively. Preventive intervention practices varied significantly among the sites, with risk-targeted and tailored interventions delivered to only 1.15%~49.5% of at-risk patients. Fall events were not recorded in self-reporting systems and nursing notes for 29.5%~90.6% and 4.4%~17.1% of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Challenges in fall prevention included weaknesses in the design and implementation of local fall protocols and low-quality incident self-reporting systems. Systematic and sustainable solutions are needed to help reduce hospital fall rates and injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017993\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:住院患者跌倒是一种不良事件,由于医院环境和患者危险因素之间复杂的相互作用,经常导致损伤,并且仍然是临床环境中的一个重要问题。目的:本研究旨在确定(1)实践变化和关键问题,从医院跌倒管理协议到事件检测,以及(2)解决这些挑战的潜在方法。设计:回顾性队列研究。背景:韩国的四家综合医院。方法:采用Donabedian质量结局模型对定性和定量资料进行分析。回顾性收集了2015-2023年间四家综合医院的当地实践方案、电子记录中的患者入院和护理数据以及事件自我报告数据。在每个地点对医院跌倒事件的操作规程和手工图表审查进行了内容分析。在每个站点还对护理活动和患者跌倒预防干预措施进行了定量分析。结果:不同地区的跌倒管理方案在跌倒定义、风险评估工具、纳入和排除标准等方面存在差异。原始版本和改进版本的启发式工具表现较差至中等,接受者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.54~0.74和0.59~0.80。不同地区的预防干预措施差异很大,针对风险和量身定制的干预措施仅适用于1.15%~49.5%的高危患者。29.5%~90.6%和4.4%~17.1%的患者未在自我报告系统和护理笔记中记录跌倒事件。结论:预防跌倒的挑战包括地方跌倒方案设计和实施的弱点以及低质量的事件自我报告系统。需要有系统和可持续的解决方案来帮助减少住院跌倒率和伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Under-reporting of falls in hospitals: a multisite study in South Korea.

Background: Inpatient falls are adverse events that often result in injury due to complex interactions between the hospital environment and patient risk factors and remain a significant problem in clinical settings.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify (1) practice variations and key issues ranging from hospital fall management protocols to incident detection, and (2) potential approaches to address these challenges.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Four general hospitals in South Korea.

Methods: Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed using the Donabedian quality outcomes model. Data were collected retrospectively during 2015-2023 from four general hospitals on local practice protocols, patient admission and nursing data from electronic records, and incident self-reports. Content analysis of practice protocol and manual chart reviews for hospital falls incidents was conducted at each site. Quantitative analyses of nursing activities and analysis of patient falls prevention interventions were also conducted at each site.

Results: There were variations in fall definitions, risk-assessment tools and inclusion and exclusion criteria among the local fall management protocols. The original and modified versions of the heuristic tools performed poorly to moderately, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.54~0.74 and 0.59~0.80, respectively. Preventive intervention practices varied significantly among the sites, with risk-targeted and tailored interventions delivered to only 1.15%~49.5% of at-risk patients. Fall events were not recorded in self-reporting systems and nursing notes for 29.5%~90.6% and 4.4%~17.1% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Challenges in fall prevention included weaknesses in the design and implementation of local fall protocols and low-quality incident self-reporting systems. Systematic and sustainable solutions are needed to help reduce hospital fall rates and injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信