孕前BMI和妊娠体重增加(GWG)与子痫前期的关系:一项基于受限三次样条的研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Luhan Zhang, Juan Ding, Jiangli Liu, Jing Ma, Rui Shi, Tian Chen, Guifeng Ding
{"title":"孕前BMI和妊娠体重增加(GWG)与子痫前期的关系:一项基于受限三次样条的研究。","authors":"Luhan Zhang, Juan Ding, Jiangli Liu, Jing Ma, Rui Shi, Tian Chen, Guifeng Ding","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07449-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the nonlinear associations between prepregnancy body mass index(BMI), gestational weight gain(GWG), and the risk of preeclampsia(PE) using maternal and infant cohort data, thereby providing a scientific foundation for preventive strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women with regular obstetric checkups in Urumqi Youai Hospital were selected as study subjects from January 2020 to June 2024. They were divided into the PE group and the non-PE group. Baseline information and pregnancy outcomes were collected, and logistic regression analysis was employed to ascertain the impacts of diverse factors on the odds of developing PE; the restricted cubic spline was used to test the nonlinear relationship between prepregnancy BMI and GWG with PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,294 pregnant women were included in the study, and 559 (4.20%) had PE.The prevalence of PE in underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese women was 1.72%, 2.85%, 6.60%, and 16.05%, respectively. However, after adjusting for confounders, only overweight and obesity were significantly associated with elevated PE odds. Logistic regression results showed that the OR was 1.68(95% CI:1.30-2.18) for the comparison between overweight and normal BMI groups, the OR was 3.16(95%CI:2.08-4.79) for the comparison between obesity and normal BMI groups. Restricted cubic spline showed that the association between prepregnancy BMI and the odds of PE showed an inverse L-shaped curve, with an inflection point of 21.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; the association between GWG and the odds of PE showed a J-shaped curve, with a GWG of 10.94-15.90 kg being at the lowest odds for the development of PE. For pregnant women with prepregnancy underweight, the odds of PE were significantly increased when their GWG exceeded 21.63 kg. Similarly, for those with prepregnancy normal weight, a significant elevation in the odds of PE was observed when their GWG surpassed 15.90 kg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a non-linear relationship between prepregnancy BMI, GWG, and PE, and prepregnancy weight management and gestational weight monitoring are important for the prevention of PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between prepregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain(GWG) with preeclampsia: a study based on restricted cubic spline.\",\"authors\":\"Luhan Zhang, Juan Ding, Jiangli Liu, Jing Ma, Rui Shi, Tian Chen, Guifeng Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07449-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the nonlinear associations between prepregnancy body mass index(BMI), gestational weight gain(GWG), and the risk of preeclampsia(PE) using maternal and infant cohort data, thereby providing a scientific foundation for preventive strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women with regular obstetric checkups in Urumqi Youai Hospital were selected as study subjects from January 2020 to June 2024. They were divided into the PE group and the non-PE group. Baseline information and pregnancy outcomes were collected, and logistic regression analysis was employed to ascertain the impacts of diverse factors on the odds of developing PE; the restricted cubic spline was used to test the nonlinear relationship between prepregnancy BMI and GWG with PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,294 pregnant women were included in the study, and 559 (4.20%) had PE.The prevalence of PE in underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese women was 1.72%, 2.85%, 6.60%, and 16.05%, respectively. However, after adjusting for confounders, only overweight and obesity were significantly associated with elevated PE odds. Logistic regression results showed that the OR was 1.68(95% CI:1.30-2.18) for the comparison between overweight and normal BMI groups, the OR was 3.16(95%CI:2.08-4.79) for the comparison between obesity and normal BMI groups. Restricted cubic spline showed that the association between prepregnancy BMI and the odds of PE showed an inverse L-shaped curve, with an inflection point of 21.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; the association between GWG and the odds of PE showed a J-shaped curve, with a GWG of 10.94-15.90 kg being at the lowest odds for the development of PE. For pregnant women with prepregnancy underweight, the odds of PE were significantly increased when their GWG exceeded 21.63 kg. Similarly, for those with prepregnancy normal weight, a significant elevation in the odds of PE was observed when their GWG surpassed 15.90 kg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a non-linear relationship between prepregnancy BMI, GWG, and PE, and prepregnancy weight management and gestational weight monitoring are important for the prevention of PE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07449-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07449-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过母婴队列数据评估孕前体重指数(BMI)、妊娠体重增加(GWG)与子痫前期(PE)风险之间的非线性关系,为制定预防策略提供科学依据。方法:选取2020年1月~ 2024年6月在乌鲁木齐市友爱医院定期产科检查的孕妇为研究对象。他们被分为体育组和非体育组。收集基线信息和妊娠结局,采用logistic回归分析确定各种因素对PE发生几率的影响;采用受限三次样条检验孕前BMI、GWG与PE之间的非线性关系。结果:13294例孕妇纳入研究,559例(4.20%)发生PE。体重不足、正常体重、超重和肥胖女性的PE患病率分别为1.72%、2.85%、6.60%和16.05%。然而,在调整混杂因素后,只有超重和肥胖与PE发生率升高显著相关。Logistic回归结果显示,超重组与正常BMI组比较的OR为1.68(95% CI:1.30 ~ 2.18),肥胖组与正常BMI组比较的OR为3.16(95%CI:2.08 ~ 4.79)。受限三次样条显示,孕前BMI与PE发生率呈反l型曲线,拐点为21.5 kg/m2;GWG与PE发生率呈j型曲线关系,GWG为10.94 ~ 15.90 kg时PE发生率最低。孕前体重过轻的孕妇,GWG超过21.63 kg时PE的发生率显著增加。同样,对于那些孕前体重正常的人,当她们的GWG超过15.90 kg时,PE的几率显著升高。结论:孕前BMI、GWG与PE呈非线性关系,孕前体重管理和孕期体重监测对PE的预防具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between prepregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain(GWG) with preeclampsia: a study based on restricted cubic spline.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the nonlinear associations between prepregnancy body mass index(BMI), gestational weight gain(GWG), and the risk of preeclampsia(PE) using maternal and infant cohort data, thereby providing a scientific foundation for preventive strategies.

Methods: Pregnant women with regular obstetric checkups in Urumqi Youai Hospital were selected as study subjects from January 2020 to June 2024. They were divided into the PE group and the non-PE group. Baseline information and pregnancy outcomes were collected, and logistic regression analysis was employed to ascertain the impacts of diverse factors on the odds of developing PE; the restricted cubic spline was used to test the nonlinear relationship between prepregnancy BMI and GWG with PE.

Results: 13,294 pregnant women were included in the study, and 559 (4.20%) had PE.The prevalence of PE in underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese women was 1.72%, 2.85%, 6.60%, and 16.05%, respectively. However, after adjusting for confounders, only overweight and obesity were significantly associated with elevated PE odds. Logistic regression results showed that the OR was 1.68(95% CI:1.30-2.18) for the comparison between overweight and normal BMI groups, the OR was 3.16(95%CI:2.08-4.79) for the comparison between obesity and normal BMI groups. Restricted cubic spline showed that the association between prepregnancy BMI and the odds of PE showed an inverse L-shaped curve, with an inflection point of 21.5 kg/m2; the association between GWG and the odds of PE showed a J-shaped curve, with a GWG of 10.94-15.90 kg being at the lowest odds for the development of PE. For pregnant women with prepregnancy underweight, the odds of PE were significantly increased when their GWG exceeded 21.63 kg. Similarly, for those with prepregnancy normal weight, a significant elevation in the odds of PE was observed when their GWG surpassed 15.90 kg.

Conclusion: There is a non-linear relationship between prepregnancy BMI, GWG, and PE, and prepregnancy weight management and gestational weight monitoring are important for the prevention of PE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信