上睑成形术后的功能和美学结果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Dominik Todorov, Sebastian Mitchell, Mustafa Al-Hashimi, Zaid Dajani, Kelvin Sunn Hoah Yap, Hassan Imtiaz, Kian Daneshi, Ankur Khajuria
{"title":"上睑成形术后的功能和美学结果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Dominik Todorov, Sebastian Mitchell, Mustafa Al-Hashimi, Zaid Dajani, Kelvin Sunn Hoah Yap, Hassan Imtiaz, Kian Daneshi, Ankur Khajuria","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upper blepharoplasty addresses aging-related changes by removing excess skin, muscle, and fat from the upper eyelids. This systematic review, which was registered a priori, improves upon previously published reviews regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes following upper blepharoplasty. Custom search strategies were applied across multiple databases, namely MEDLINE (United States National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane Library, London, UK), Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA), PubMed (United States National Library of Medicine), and PsychInfo (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC). Bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and methodological quality was evaluated with GRADE. Out of 6799 articles, 12 randomized controlled trials with 450 patients (39 men, 411 women) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant reduction in dry eye symptoms post-upper blepharoplasty compared with preoperative status (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-0.36; P < .00001). No significant difference in postoperative dry eye incidence was found between orbicularis oculi muscle plus skin excision and skin-only excision (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.86-2.80; P = .25). However, muscle plus skin excision had a higher incidence of lagophthalmos (OR, 7.98; 95% CI, 1.41-45.21; P = .02). No significant differences were observed in eye irritation (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.51-2.84; P = .66) or patient satisfaction (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.42-3.14; P = .80). Continuous suturing techniques increased eye irritation compared with subcuticular suturing (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-2.91; P = .03). All studies were high quality with a low risk of bias. The findings support upper blepharoplasty's efficacy in reducing dry eye symptoms, with muscle-sparing techniques minimizing lagophthalmos and maintaining high patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes After Upper Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Todorov, Sebastian Mitchell, Mustafa Al-Hashimi, Zaid Dajani, Kelvin Sunn Hoah Yap, Hassan Imtiaz, Kian Daneshi, Ankur Khajuria\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Upper blepharoplasty addresses aging-related changes by removing excess skin, muscle, and fat from the upper eyelids. This systematic review, which was registered a priori, improves upon previously published reviews regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes following upper blepharoplasty. Custom search strategies were applied across multiple databases, namely MEDLINE (United States National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane Library, London, UK), Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA), PubMed (United States National Library of Medicine), and PsychInfo (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC). Bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and methodological quality was evaluated with GRADE. Out of 6799 articles, 12 randomized controlled trials with 450 patients (39 men, 411 women) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant reduction in dry eye symptoms post-upper blepharoplasty compared with preoperative status (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-0.36; P < .00001). No significant difference in postoperative dry eye incidence was found between orbicularis oculi muscle plus skin excision and skin-only excision (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.86-2.80; P = .25). However, muscle plus skin excision had a higher incidence of lagophthalmos (OR, 7.98; 95% CI, 1.41-45.21; P = .02). No significant differences were observed in eye irritation (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.51-2.84; P = .66) or patient satisfaction (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.42-3.14; P = .80). Continuous suturing techniques increased eye irritation compared with subcuticular suturing (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-2.91; P = .03). All studies were high quality with a low risk of bias. The findings support upper blepharoplasty's efficacy in reducing dry eye symptoms, with muscle-sparing techniques minimizing lagophthalmos and maintaining high patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic): </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上睑成形术通过去除上眼睑多余的皮肤、肌肉和脂肪来解决与年龄相关的变化。这篇系统的综述,是先验的,改进了先前发表的关于上睑成形术后功能和美学结果的综述。自定义搜索策略应用于多个数据库,即MEDLINE(美国国家医学图书馆,马里兰州贝塞斯达),Embase(爱思唯尔,荷兰阿姆斯特丹),谷歌Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central;Cochrane图书馆,伦敦,英国),Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics,费城,宾夕法尼亚州),PubMed(美国国家医学图书馆)和PsychInfo(美国心理学会,华盛顿特区)。用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚,用GRADE评估方法学质量。在6799篇文章中,纳入了12项随机对照试验,涉及450名患者(39名男性,411名女性)。meta分析显示,与术前相比,上睑成形术后干眼症状显著减少(优势比[OR], 0.22;95% ci, 0.13-0.36;P < 0.001)。眼轮匝肌加皮肤切除与单纯皮肤切除术后干眼发生率无显著差异(OR, 1.55;95% ci, 0.86-2.80;P = .25)。然而,肌肉加皮肤切除的眼球laglagmos发生率较高(OR, 7.98;95% ci, 1.41-45.21;P = .02)。两组在眼睛刺激方面无显著差异(OR, 1.21;95% ci, 0.51-2.84;P = 0.66)或患者满意度(or, 1.14;95% ci, 0.42-3.14;P = .80)。与皮下缝合相比,连续缝合技术增加了眼睛刺激(OR, 1.77;95% ci, 1.07-2.91;P = .03)。所有研究均为高质量、低偏倚风险的研究。研究结果支持上睑成形术在减少干眼症状方面的疗效,保留肌肉的技术可最大限度地减少眼lagmomos,并保持较高的患者满意度。证据等级:3(治疗性):
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes After Upper Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

Upper blepharoplasty addresses aging-related changes by removing excess skin, muscle, and fat from the upper eyelids. This systematic review, which was registered a priori, improves upon previously published reviews regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes following upper blepharoplasty. Custom search strategies were applied across multiple databases, namely MEDLINE (United States National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane Library, London, UK), Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA), PubMed (United States National Library of Medicine), and PsychInfo (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC). Bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and methodological quality was evaluated with GRADE. Out of 6799 articles, 12 randomized controlled trials with 450 patients (39 men, 411 women) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant reduction in dry eye symptoms post-upper blepharoplasty compared with preoperative status (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-0.36; P < .00001). No significant difference in postoperative dry eye incidence was found between orbicularis oculi muscle plus skin excision and skin-only excision (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.86-2.80; P = .25). However, muscle plus skin excision had a higher incidence of lagophthalmos (OR, 7.98; 95% CI, 1.41-45.21; P = .02). No significant differences were observed in eye irritation (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.51-2.84; P = .66) or patient satisfaction (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.42-3.14; P = .80). Continuous suturing techniques increased eye irritation compared with subcuticular suturing (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-2.91; P = .03). All studies were high quality with a low risk of bias. The findings support upper blepharoplasty's efficacy in reducing dry eye symptoms, with muscle-sparing techniques minimizing lagophthalmos and maintaining high patient satisfaction.

Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic):

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信