Qian He, A. Park Williams, Miriam R. Johnston, Caroline S. Juang, Bowen Wang
{"title":"Influence of Time-Averaging of Climate Data on Estimates of Atmospheric Vapor Pressure Deficit and Inferred Relationships With Wildfire Area in the Western United States","authors":"Qian He, A. Park Williams, Miriam R. Johnston, Caroline S. Juang, Bowen Wang","doi":"10.1029/2024GL113708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a driver of evaporative demand and correlates strongly with wildfire extent in the western United States (WUS). Vapor pressure deficit is the difference between saturation vapor pressure (<i>e</i><sub>s</sub>) and actual vapor pressure (<i>e</i><sub>a</sub>). Because <i>e</i><sub>s</sub> increases nonlinearly with temperature, calculations of time-averaged VPD vary depending on the frequency of temperature measurements and how <i>e</i><sub>a</sub> is calculated, potentially limiting our understanding of fire-climate relationships. We calculate eight versions of monthly VPD across the WUS and assess their differences. Monthly VPDs calculated from daily data are 2%–6% higher, and more accurate, than when calculated from monthly data. Using daily maximum and minimum temperature, instead of mean, increases VPD by ∼20%, but can overestimate true values depending on how <i>e</i><sub>a</sub> is calculated. These differences do not meaningfully impact correlations with annual wildfire area, however, suggesting our understanding of historical fire-VPD relations is not very sensitive to how VPD is calculated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL113708","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL113708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
蒸气压差(VPD)是蒸发需求的驱动因素,与美国西部(WUS)的野火范围密切相关。蒸气压差是饱和蒸气压 (es) 与实际蒸气压 (ea) 之间的差值。由于 es 随温度呈非线性增长,因此时间平均 VPD 的计算会因温度测量频率和 ea 的计算方法而有所不同,这可能会限制我们对火灾与气候关系的理解。我们计算了整个 WUS 地区的八个版本的月平均 VPD,并评估了它们之间的差异。根据日数据计算的月 VPD 比根据月数据计算的高 2%-6%,而且更准确。使用日最高气温和日最低气温而不是平均气温会使 VPD 增加 20%,但根据 ea 的计算方法,可能会高估真实值。然而,这些差异并不会对与年度野火面积的相关性产生有意义的影响,这表明我们对历史火灾-VPD 关系的理解对如何计算 VPD 并不十分敏感。
Influence of Time-Averaging of Climate Data on Estimates of Atmospheric Vapor Pressure Deficit and Inferred Relationships With Wildfire Area in the Western United States
Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a driver of evaporative demand and correlates strongly with wildfire extent in the western United States (WUS). Vapor pressure deficit is the difference between saturation vapor pressure (es) and actual vapor pressure (ea). Because es increases nonlinearly with temperature, calculations of time-averaged VPD vary depending on the frequency of temperature measurements and how ea is calculated, potentially limiting our understanding of fire-climate relationships. We calculate eight versions of monthly VPD across the WUS and assess their differences. Monthly VPDs calculated from daily data are 2%–6% higher, and more accurate, than when calculated from monthly data. Using daily maximum and minimum temperature, instead of mean, increases VPD by ∼20%, but can overestimate true values depending on how ea is calculated. These differences do not meaningfully impact correlations with annual wildfire area, however, suggesting our understanding of historical fire-VPD relations is not very sensitive to how VPD is calculated.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.