IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joseph Januszewicz, Nicole R. Fowler, Matthew B. Mackwood, Elliott Fisher, Alice O. Andrews, Rachel O. Schmidt, Ellesse-Roselee L. Akré, Karen E. Schifferdecker
{"title":"Primary care preparedness to care for patients with ADRD: A national survey study","authors":"Joseph Januszewicz,&nbsp;Nicole R. Fowler,&nbsp;Matthew B. Mackwood,&nbsp;Elliott Fisher,&nbsp;Alice O. Andrews,&nbsp;Rachel O. Schmidt,&nbsp;Ellesse-Roselee L. Akré,&nbsp;Karen E. Schifferdecker","doi":"10.1002/alz.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>It is unknown how prepared primary care practices are to deliver recommended dementia care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>A nationally representative survey of US primary care practices focused on care delivery processes, including those for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1245 of 3498 practices (36%) responded. Most practices reported systems to detect patients with ADRD (67%) and refer patients for diagnostic testing (75%). Fewer required ADRD-related training (45%–46%) or maintained an ADRD registry (29%). Practices that scored higher on ADRD care preparedness were more likely to be smaller, receive a higher proportion of revenue from Medicare, and have other important practice capabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Primary care practices have mixed preparedness to care for patients with ADRD. Efforts to boost ADRD preparedness, including providing adequate infrastructure and resources directly to primary care, should be a priority to address disparities in diagnosis and to optimize the patient and caregiver journey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Mixed ADRD preparedness identified in primary care practices across the United States.</li>\n \n <li>Practices often lack ADRD-specific registries and staff training initiatives.</li>\n \n <li>Medicare-reliant and larger physician-owned groups show higher ADRD preparedness.</li>\n \n <li>FQHCs reported lower ADRD preparedness, highlighting potential gaps in care.</li>\n \n <li>Cultural awareness and other support services correlate with better ADRD readiness.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 目前尚不清楚初级医疗机构在提供建议的痴呆症护理方面准备得如何。 方法 对美国的初级医疗机构进行了一次具有全国代表性的调查,重点是医疗服务流程,包括阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)患者的医疗服务流程。 结果 在 3498 家医疗机构中,共有 1245 家(36%)做出了回应。大多数医疗机构报告了检测 ADRD 患者(67%)和转诊患者进行诊断测试(75%)的系统。要求进行 ADRD 相关培训(45%-46%)或建立 ADRD 登记册(29%)的诊所较少。在 ADRD 护理准备方面得分较高的诊所更有可能规模较小,从医疗保险获得的收入比例较高,并具备其他重要的实践能力。 讨论 初级医疗机构对 ADRD 患者的护理准备情况参差不齐。努力提高 ADRD 的准备程度,包括直接为初级保健提供充足的基础设施和资源,应成为解决诊断不均衡问题以及优化患者和护理人员旅程的优先事项。 亮点 在美国各地的初级医疗实践中发现的 ADRD 准备情况参差不齐。 医疗机构通常缺乏针对 ADRD 的登记簿和员工培训计划。 依赖医疗保险和较大的医生所有团体的 ADRD 准备程度较高。 全科医疗保健中心(FQHC)报告的 ADRD 准备程度较低,凸显出护理方面的潜在差距。 文化意识和其他支持服务与更好的 ADRD 准备程度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Primary care preparedness to care for patients with ADRD: A national survey study

Primary care preparedness to care for patients with ADRD: A national survey study

INTRODUCTION

It is unknown how prepared primary care practices are to deliver recommended dementia care.

METHODS

A nationally representative survey of US primary care practices focused on care delivery processes, including those for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

RESULTS

A total of 1245 of 3498 practices (36%) responded. Most practices reported systems to detect patients with ADRD (67%) and refer patients for diagnostic testing (75%). Fewer required ADRD-related training (45%–46%) or maintained an ADRD registry (29%). Practices that scored higher on ADRD care preparedness were more likely to be smaller, receive a higher proportion of revenue from Medicare, and have other important practice capabilities.

DISCUSSION

Primary care practices have mixed preparedness to care for patients with ADRD. Efforts to boost ADRD preparedness, including providing adequate infrastructure and resources directly to primary care, should be a priority to address disparities in diagnosis and to optimize the patient and caregiver journey.

Highlights

  • Mixed ADRD preparedness identified in primary care practices across the United States.
  • Practices often lack ADRD-specific registries and staff training initiatives.
  • Medicare-reliant and larger physician-owned groups show higher ADRD preparedness.
  • FQHCs reported lower ADRD preparedness, highlighting potential gaps in care.
  • Cultural awareness and other support services correlate with better ADRD readiness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信