在Soar认知架构中实现视觉-符号的整合

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
James Boggs
{"title":"在Soar认知架构中实现视觉-符号的整合","authors":"James Boggs","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Computational models of visual reasoning are largely separate from models of non-visual reasoning and include only enough high-level reasoning to perform specific visual reasoning tasks, such as Raven’s progressive matrices or visual question answering. Although these models perform well at the pure visual reasoning tasks for which they are designed, their lack of a connection with a general-purpose high-level reasoning system means they cannot be applied to tasks requiring <em>deliberate</em> reasoning about both visual and non-visual knowledge. Simultaneously, many of the most mature and heavily studied cognitive architectures (e.g., Soar, ACT-R) feature only partial visual reasoning capabilities or none at all. This work describes initial efforts to create a visual reasoning system tightly integrated with a broader reasoning system by extending the Soar cognitive architecture with low-level visual memories and reasoning processes, and an evaluation of this system on tasks in a simple domain. Its ultimate aim is to demonstrate a path towards accommodating multiple levels of visual knowledge representations within an otherwise mostly symbolic, rules-based architecture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards visual-symbolic integration in the Soar cognitive architecture\",\"authors\":\"James Boggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Computational models of visual reasoning are largely separate from models of non-visual reasoning and include only enough high-level reasoning to perform specific visual reasoning tasks, such as Raven’s progressive matrices or visual question answering. Although these models perform well at the pure visual reasoning tasks for which they are designed, their lack of a connection with a general-purpose high-level reasoning system means they cannot be applied to tasks requiring <em>deliberate</em> reasoning about both visual and non-visual knowledge. Simultaneously, many of the most mature and heavily studied cognitive architectures (e.g., Soar, ACT-R) feature only partial visual reasoning capabilities or none at all. This work describes initial efforts to create a visual reasoning system tightly integrated with a broader reasoning system by extending the Soar cognitive architecture with low-level visual memories and reasoning processes, and an evaluation of this system on tasks in a simple domain. Its ultimate aim is to demonstrate a path towards accommodating multiple levels of visual knowledge representations within an otherwise mostly symbolic, rules-based architecture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000336\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视觉推理的计算模型在很大程度上与非视觉推理模型分开,并且只包括足够的高级推理来执行特定的视觉推理任务,例如Raven的渐进矩阵或视觉问题回答。尽管这些模型在纯视觉推理任务中表现良好,但它们缺乏与通用高级推理系统的联系,这意味着它们不能应用于需要对视觉和非视觉知识进行深思熟虑推理的任务。同时,许多最成熟和被大量研究的认知架构(例如,Soar, ACT-R)只具有部分视觉推理能力,或者根本没有。这项工作描述了创建一个视觉推理系统与更广泛的推理系统紧密集成的初步努力,通过扩展具有低级视觉记忆和推理过程的Soar认知架构,并在一个简单领域对该系统的任务进行评估。它的最终目标是展示在一个主要是符号的、基于规则的体系结构中容纳多层次视觉知识表示的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards visual-symbolic integration in the Soar cognitive architecture
Computational models of visual reasoning are largely separate from models of non-visual reasoning and include only enough high-level reasoning to perform specific visual reasoning tasks, such as Raven’s progressive matrices or visual question answering. Although these models perform well at the pure visual reasoning tasks for which they are designed, their lack of a connection with a general-purpose high-level reasoning system means they cannot be applied to tasks requiring deliberate reasoning about both visual and non-visual knowledge. Simultaneously, many of the most mature and heavily studied cognitive architectures (e.g., Soar, ACT-R) feature only partial visual reasoning capabilities or none at all. This work describes initial efforts to create a visual reasoning system tightly integrated with a broader reasoning system by extending the Soar cognitive architecture with low-level visual memories and reasoning processes, and an evaluation of this system on tasks in a simple domain. Its ultimate aim is to demonstrate a path towards accommodating multiple levels of visual knowledge representations within an otherwise mostly symbolic, rules-based architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信