红树林覆盖和工程结构对杂交活岸线底栖大型动物和浮游生物组合的差异影响

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Sophie C.Y. Chan , Amanda R. Hsiung , Stephen E. Swearer , Rebecca L. Morris
{"title":"红树林覆盖和工程结构对杂交活岸线底栖大型动物和浮游生物组合的差异影响","authors":"Sophie C.Y. Chan ,&nbsp;Amanda R. Hsiung ,&nbsp;Stephen E. Swearer ,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Morris","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hybrid shoreline stabilisation with rock fillets has facilitated mangrove establishment at eroding estuarine shorelines in New South Wales, Australia. To assess the biodiversity benefits of installing hybrid mangrove shorelines, this study compared mangrove structure, benthic macrofauna and nekton assemblages in these hybrid mangroves to nearby natural fringing mangroves across multiple estuaries. Hybrid mangroves (6–10 years old) showed higher densities of trees and seedlings but comparable macrobenthos abundance to natural mangroves. However, differences in macrobenthos composition, especially in crab and polychaete species, were noted across estuaries and between natural and hybrid mangroves with varying mangrove cover. Mangrove cover had limited effect on the utilisation of hybrid mangroves by nekton species. Mainly the freshwater prawn (<em>Macrobrachium australiense)</em> and demersal species, such as glassgoby (<em>Gobiopterus semivestitus</em>), juvenile yellowfin bream (<em>Acanthopagrus australis</em>), and flat-tail mullet (<em>Gracimugil argenteus</em>), were found in the hybrid mangroves. Overall, nekton was more abundant at hybrid mangroves than at natural fringing mangroves, possibly due to the hydrodynamic shielding and additional refuge provided by rock crevices. When planning hybrid living shorelines, it is crucial to consider the temporal lag in recovery and the potential trade-offs in ecological processes and functions, which can vary depending on the local species pool and environmental conditions. If mangroves cannot naturally establish at eroding shorelines, installing rock fillets to facilitate mangrove establishment could be an effective alternative to reduce lateral erosion while providing habitats for estuarine fauna.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential effects of mangrove cover and engineered structures on benthic macrofauna and nekton assemblages in hybrid living shorelines\",\"authors\":\"Sophie C.Y. Chan ,&nbsp;Amanda R. Hsiung ,&nbsp;Stephen E. Swearer ,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hybrid shoreline stabilisation with rock fillets has facilitated mangrove establishment at eroding estuarine shorelines in New South Wales, Australia. To assess the biodiversity benefits of installing hybrid mangrove shorelines, this study compared mangrove structure, benthic macrofauna and nekton assemblages in these hybrid mangroves to nearby natural fringing mangroves across multiple estuaries. Hybrid mangroves (6–10 years old) showed higher densities of trees and seedlings but comparable macrobenthos abundance to natural mangroves. However, differences in macrobenthos composition, especially in crab and polychaete species, were noted across estuaries and between natural and hybrid mangroves with varying mangrove cover. Mangrove cover had limited effect on the utilisation of hybrid mangroves by nekton species. Mainly the freshwater prawn (<em>Macrobrachium australiense)</em> and demersal species, such as glassgoby (<em>Gobiopterus semivestitus</em>), juvenile yellowfin bream (<em>Acanthopagrus australis</em>), and flat-tail mullet (<em>Gracimugil argenteus</em>), were found in the hybrid mangroves. Overall, nekton was more abundant at hybrid mangroves than at natural fringing mangroves, possibly due to the hydrodynamic shielding and additional refuge provided by rock crevices. When planning hybrid living shorelines, it is crucial to consider the temporal lag in recovery and the potential trade-offs in ecological processes and functions, which can vary depending on the local species pool and environmental conditions. If mangroves cannot naturally establish at eroding shorelines, installing rock fillets to facilitate mangrove establishment could be an effective alternative to reduce lateral erosion while providing habitats for estuarine fauna.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚新南威尔士州,混合岸线稳定与岩石夹角促进了红树林在侵蚀的河口岸线上的建立。为了评估设置杂交红树林海岸线对生物多样性的好处,本研究将这些杂交红树林中的红树林结构、底栖大型动物和浮游生物组合与附近多个河口的自然边缘红树林进行了比较。杂交红树(6 ~ 10年生)的乔木和幼苗密度高于天然红树,但大型底栖动物的丰度与天然红树相当。然而,大型底栖动物的组成,特别是螃蟹和多毛类的种类,在不同的河口和自然红树林和杂交红树林之间存在差异。红树林覆被对杂交红树林的利用影响有限。杂交红树林主要有淡水对虾(Macrobrachium australiense)和玻璃虾(Gobiopterus semivestitus)、黄鳍鱼幼鱼(Acanthopagrus australis)、平尾鲻鱼(Gracimugil argenteus)等底栖鱼类。总体而言,杂交红树林的浮游生物比天然边缘红树林的浮游生物更丰富,这可能是由于岩石裂缝提供的水动力屏蔽和额外的避难所。在规划混合生物海岸线时,考虑恢复的时间滞后以及生态过程和功能的潜在权衡是至关重要的,这可能因当地物种池和环境条件而异。如果红树林不能自然生长在受侵蚀的海岸线上,安装石坝以促进红树林的生长,可能是一种有效的替代方法,既可以减少横向侵蚀,又可以为河口动物提供栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential effects of mangrove cover and engineered structures on benthic macrofauna and nekton assemblages in hybrid living shorelines
Hybrid shoreline stabilisation with rock fillets has facilitated mangrove establishment at eroding estuarine shorelines in New South Wales, Australia. To assess the biodiversity benefits of installing hybrid mangrove shorelines, this study compared mangrove structure, benthic macrofauna and nekton assemblages in these hybrid mangroves to nearby natural fringing mangroves across multiple estuaries. Hybrid mangroves (6–10 years old) showed higher densities of trees and seedlings but comparable macrobenthos abundance to natural mangroves. However, differences in macrobenthos composition, especially in crab and polychaete species, were noted across estuaries and between natural and hybrid mangroves with varying mangrove cover. Mangrove cover had limited effect on the utilisation of hybrid mangroves by nekton species. Mainly the freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium australiense) and demersal species, such as glassgoby (Gobiopterus semivestitus), juvenile yellowfin bream (Acanthopagrus australis), and flat-tail mullet (Gracimugil argenteus), were found in the hybrid mangroves. Overall, nekton was more abundant at hybrid mangroves than at natural fringing mangroves, possibly due to the hydrodynamic shielding and additional refuge provided by rock crevices. When planning hybrid living shorelines, it is crucial to consider the temporal lag in recovery and the potential trade-offs in ecological processes and functions, which can vary depending on the local species pool and environmental conditions. If mangroves cannot naturally establish at eroding shorelines, installing rock fillets to facilitate mangrove establishment could be an effective alternative to reduce lateral erosion while providing habitats for estuarine fauna.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信