低钙危重症患者的肠外补钙和预后:一项回顾性队列研究

Max Melchers , Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius Moonen , Tessa Maria Breeman , Sjoerd Hendrika Willem van Bree , Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten
{"title":"低钙危重症患者的肠外补钙和预后:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Max Melchers ,&nbsp;Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius Moonen ,&nbsp;Tessa Maria Breeman ,&nbsp;Sjoerd Hendrika Willem van Bree ,&nbsp;Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypocalcemia is common among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The administration of calcium in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia remains debated, as previous data on outcomes are conflicting, and subgroup analyses are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the association between parenteral calcium administration and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients who had hypocalcemia with and without sepsis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included individuals who developed hypocalcemia during the first 7 days of admission to a mixed medical-surgical adult ICU at a University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients who were not receiving renal replacement therapy, and were admitted to the ICU for at least 48 h between October 1, 2015 and September 24, 2020, were included. The primary outcomes included all-cause 180-day mortality and time-to-shock resolution. Subgroup analyses were conducted in sepsis and nonsepsis patients with mild or moderate hypocalcemia, based on median splits. Proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify the association between parenteral calcium administration and outcome parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 1100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 427 (38.8 %) patients were admitted for sepsis and 576 (52.4 %) patients received parenteral calcium. Patients who received and did not receive parenteral calcium demonstrated no significant difference in 180-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.18, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.56). Intravenous calcium administration reduced the probability of a shorter time to shock resolution (adjusted odds ratio = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.70 to 0.94). Subgroup analyses in patients with and without sepsis indicated no significant association between calcium administration (aHR = 1.63, 95 % CI: 0.99 to 2.69) and 180-day mortality (aHR = 1.06, 95  % CI: 0.74 to 1.51). Notably, parenteral calcium was associated with an elevated risk of 90- and 180-day mortality in patients who had sepsis and mild hypocalcemia (aHR = 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.02 to 3.47 and aHR = 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.07 to 3.00, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intravenous calcium administration did not provide survival or shock resolution benefits in ICU patients with hypocalcemia, and may even be harmful. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 151-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parenteral calcium administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Max Melchers ,&nbsp;Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius Moonen ,&nbsp;Tessa Maria Breeman ,&nbsp;Sjoerd Hendrika Willem van Bree ,&nbsp;Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jointm.2024.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypocalcemia is common among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The administration of calcium in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia remains debated, as previous data on outcomes are conflicting, and subgroup analyses are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the association between parenteral calcium administration and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients who had hypocalcemia with and without sepsis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included individuals who developed hypocalcemia during the first 7 days of admission to a mixed medical-surgical adult ICU at a University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients who were not receiving renal replacement therapy, and were admitted to the ICU for at least 48 h between October 1, 2015 and September 24, 2020, were included. The primary outcomes included all-cause 180-day mortality and time-to-shock resolution. Subgroup analyses were conducted in sepsis and nonsepsis patients with mild or moderate hypocalcemia, based on median splits. Proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify the association between parenteral calcium administration and outcome parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 1100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 427 (38.8 %) patients were admitted for sepsis and 576 (52.4 %) patients received parenteral calcium. Patients who received and did not receive parenteral calcium demonstrated no significant difference in 180-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.18, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.56). Intravenous calcium administration reduced the probability of a shorter time to shock resolution (adjusted odds ratio = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.70 to 0.94). Subgroup analyses in patients with and without sepsis indicated no significant association between calcium administration (aHR = 1.63, 95 % CI: 0.99 to 2.69) and 180-day mortality (aHR = 1.06, 95  % CI: 0.74 to 1.51). Notably, parenteral calcium was associated with an elevated risk of 90- and 180-day mortality in patients who had sepsis and mild hypocalcemia (aHR = 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.02 to 3.47 and aHR = 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.07 to 3.00, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intravenous calcium administration did not provide survival or shock resolution benefits in ICU patients with hypocalcemia, and may even be harmful. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 151-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X24001026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X24001026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低钙血症在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中很常见。由于先前的结果数据相互矛盾,并且缺乏亚组分析,危重症低钙患者的钙管理仍然存在争议。本研究旨在探讨低钙血症伴和不伴脓毒症的危重患者肠外钙给药与临床结果的关系。方法本回顾性队列研究纳入了在某大学附属教学医院内科-外科混合成人重症监护室入院前7天出现低钙血症的患者。纳入2015年10月1日至2020年9月24日期间未接受肾脏替代治疗且入住ICU至少48小时的患者。主要结局包括全因180天死亡率和休克缓解时间。亚组分析在脓毒症和非脓毒症轻度或中度低钙患者中进行,基于中位数分割。进行了比例风险回归分析,以确定肠外钙给药与结局参数之间的关系。结果1100例符合纳入标准的患者中,427例(38.8 %)患者因脓毒症入院,576例(52.4 %)患者接受了肠外补钙治疗。接受和未接受肠外钙治疗的患者180天死亡率无显著差异(校正风险比[aHR] = 1.18, 95 %可信区间[CI]: 0.90 ~ 1.56)。静脉给钙降低了休克缓解时间缩短的可能性(调整后优势比= 0.81,95 % CI: 0.70 ~ 0.94)。对有和无脓毒症患者的亚组分析显示,钙给药(aHR = 1.63, 95 % CI: 0.99至2.69)和180天死亡率(aHR = 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.74至1.51)之间无显著关联。值得注意的是,肠外钙与脓毒症和轻度低钙血症患者90天和180天死亡率升高相关(aHR = 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.02至3.47,aHR = 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.07至3.00)。结论静脉给钙不能改善ICU低钙患者的生存或缓解休克,甚至可能有害。需要进一步的研究,包括随机对照试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parenteral calcium administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Hypocalcemia is common among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The administration of calcium in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia remains debated, as previous data on outcomes are conflicting, and subgroup analyses are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the association between parenteral calcium administration and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients who had hypocalcemia with and without sepsis.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included individuals who developed hypocalcemia during the first 7 days of admission to a mixed medical-surgical adult ICU at a University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients who were not receiving renal replacement therapy, and were admitted to the ICU for at least 48 h between October 1, 2015 and September 24, 2020, were included. The primary outcomes included all-cause 180-day mortality and time-to-shock resolution. Subgroup analyses were conducted in sepsis and nonsepsis patients with mild or moderate hypocalcemia, based on median splits. Proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify the association between parenteral calcium administration and outcome parameters.

Results

Among the 1100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 427 (38.8 %) patients were admitted for sepsis and 576 (52.4 %) patients received parenteral calcium. Patients who received and did not receive parenteral calcium demonstrated no significant difference in 180-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.18, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.56). Intravenous calcium administration reduced the probability of a shorter time to shock resolution (adjusted odds ratio = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.70 to 0.94). Subgroup analyses in patients with and without sepsis indicated no significant association between calcium administration (aHR = 1.63, 95 % CI: 0.99 to 2.69) and 180-day mortality (aHR = 1.06, 95  % CI: 0.74 to 1.51). Notably, parenteral calcium was associated with an elevated risk of 90- and 180-day mortality in patients who had sepsis and mild hypocalcemia (aHR = 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.02 to 3.47 and aHR = 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.07 to 3.00, respectively).

Conclusions

Intravenous calcium administration did not provide survival or shock resolution benefits in ICU patients with hypocalcemia, and may even be harmful. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信