{"title":"交通和休闲步行对健康和生活满意度的影响","authors":"Hsu-Sheng Hsieh","doi":"10.1080/15568318.2025.2462161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research has investigated well-being relationships to walking and built environments. However, few studies have differentiated the impacts of environment walkability for transport and recreation on well-being. Therefore, this study identified perceived environment walkability (PEW) for transport and recreation separately and examined their associations with health status and life satisfaction. Data were collected from 300 residents in Taiwan by face-to-face questionnaire interviews. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the relationship between PEW, transport and recreational walking, body mass index, and health and life satisfaction, incorporating socioeconomic influences. Results indicated that perceptions of land use mix-access and street connectivity reflected PEW for transport, whereas perceptions of the two factors, aesthetics, land use mix-diversity, and walking facilities reflected PEW for recreation. Transport walking was not associated with well-being, but recreational walking was associated with higher health and life satisfaction. Moreover, higher BMI and lower health and life satisfaction were associated with car ownership. Based on the findings, policies for well-being improvement should promote recreational walking, instead of focusing solely on transport walking, by enhancing land use access and diversity, street connectivity, aesthetics, and walking facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47824,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages 227-246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of transport and recreational walkability on health and life satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Hsu-Sheng Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15568318.2025.2462161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research has investigated well-being relationships to walking and built environments. However, few studies have differentiated the impacts of environment walkability for transport and recreation on well-being. Therefore, this study identified perceived environment walkability (PEW) for transport and recreation separately and examined their associations with health status and life satisfaction. Data were collected from 300 residents in Taiwan by face-to-face questionnaire interviews. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the relationship between PEW, transport and recreational walking, body mass index, and health and life satisfaction, incorporating socioeconomic influences. Results indicated that perceptions of land use mix-access and street connectivity reflected PEW for transport, whereas perceptions of the two factors, aesthetics, land use mix-diversity, and walking facilities reflected PEW for recreation. Transport walking was not associated with well-being, but recreational walking was associated with higher health and life satisfaction. Moreover, higher BMI and lower health and life satisfaction were associated with car ownership. Based on the findings, policies for well-being improvement should promote recreational walking, instead of focusing solely on transport walking, by enhancing land use access and diversity, street connectivity, aesthetics, and walking facilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 227-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831825000085\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831825000085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impacts of transport and recreational walkability on health and life satisfaction
Research has investigated well-being relationships to walking and built environments. However, few studies have differentiated the impacts of environment walkability for transport and recreation on well-being. Therefore, this study identified perceived environment walkability (PEW) for transport and recreation separately and examined their associations with health status and life satisfaction. Data were collected from 300 residents in Taiwan by face-to-face questionnaire interviews. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the relationship between PEW, transport and recreational walking, body mass index, and health and life satisfaction, incorporating socioeconomic influences. Results indicated that perceptions of land use mix-access and street connectivity reflected PEW for transport, whereas perceptions of the two factors, aesthetics, land use mix-diversity, and walking facilities reflected PEW for recreation. Transport walking was not associated with well-being, but recreational walking was associated with higher health and life satisfaction. Moreover, higher BMI and lower health and life satisfaction were associated with car ownership. Based on the findings, policies for well-being improvement should promote recreational walking, instead of focusing solely on transport walking, by enhancing land use access and diversity, street connectivity, aesthetics, and walking facilities.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Sustainable Transportation provides a discussion forum for the exchange of new and innovative ideas on sustainable transportation research in the context of environmental, economical, social, and engineering aspects, as well as current and future interactions of transportation systems and other urban subsystems. The scope includes the examination of overall sustainability of any transportation system, including its infrastructure, vehicle, operation, and maintenance; the integration of social science disciplines, engineering, and information technology with transportation; the understanding of the comparative aspects of different transportation systems from a global perspective; qualitative and quantitative transportation studies; and case studies, surveys, and expository papers in an international or local context. Equal emphasis is placed on the problems of sustainable transportation that are associated with passenger and freight transportation modes in both industrialized and non-industrialized areas. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert reviewers. All peer review is single-blind. Submissions are made online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.