Rachel K. Straub, Adam J. Barrack, Jordan Cannon, Christopher M. Powers
{"title":"针对男性和女性后蹲时髋关节和/或膝关节伸肌:使用躯干和胫骨倾斜和膝关节屈曲角度的相对差异进行重复测量决策树分析","authors":"Rachel K. Straub, Adam J. Barrack, Jordan Cannon, Christopher M. Powers","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine what combination of relative trunk and tibia inclination and knee flexion biases the hip and knee extensors during the squat.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Repeated measures.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University research laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>16 healthy individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The average hip/knee extensor moment ratio (HKR) was calculated during squat descent, and trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle at peak knee flexion. A regression tree for repeated measures determined what combination of trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle predicted HKR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>HKR was predicted by trunk-tibia inclination difference (primary predictor) and knee flexion (secondary predictor). Four squatting strategies emerged: knee extensor bias (average HKR = 0.3), neutral bias (average HKR = 0.9), hip extensor bias (average HKR = 1.5), and high hip extensor bias (average HKR = 2.2). When trunk inclination exceeded tibia inclination ( ≥ 2.2°), hip-biased squatting was evident. Squat depth affected only hip-biased squatting: high hip extensor bias at moderate depths (<96° knee flexion), and a less pronounced hip bias at greater depths ( ≥ 96° knee flexion).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results provide a framework to bias the squat exercise based on intent. To maximize or minimize hip relative to knee extensor demands, clinicians should be cognizant of the trunk inclination relative to tibia inclination and the influence of knee flexion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 94-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeting the hip and/or knee extensors during the back squat in males and females: A repeated measures decision tree analysis using the relative difference in trunk and tibia inclination and knee flexion angle\",\"authors\":\"Rachel K. Straub, Adam J. Barrack, Jordan Cannon, Christopher M. Powers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine what combination of relative trunk and tibia inclination and knee flexion biases the hip and knee extensors during the squat.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Repeated measures.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University research laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>16 healthy individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The average hip/knee extensor moment ratio (HKR) was calculated during squat descent, and trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle at peak knee flexion. A regression tree for repeated measures determined what combination of trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle predicted HKR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>HKR was predicted by trunk-tibia inclination difference (primary predictor) and knee flexion (secondary predictor). Four squatting strategies emerged: knee extensor bias (average HKR = 0.3), neutral bias (average HKR = 0.9), hip extensor bias (average HKR = 1.5), and high hip extensor bias (average HKR = 2.2). When trunk inclination exceeded tibia inclination ( ≥ 2.2°), hip-biased squatting was evident. Squat depth affected only hip-biased squatting: high hip extensor bias at moderate depths (<96° knee flexion), and a less pronounced hip bias at greater depths ( ≥ 96° knee flexion).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results provide a framework to bias the squat exercise based on intent. To maximize or minimize hip relative to knee extensor demands, clinicians should be cognizant of the trunk inclination relative to tibia inclination and the influence of knee flexion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X25000574\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X25000574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Targeting the hip and/or knee extensors during the back squat in males and females: A repeated measures decision tree analysis using the relative difference in trunk and tibia inclination and knee flexion angle
Objective
To determine what combination of relative trunk and tibia inclination and knee flexion biases the hip and knee extensors during the squat.
Design
Repeated measures.
Setting
University research laboratory.
Participants
16 healthy individuals.
Main Outcome Measures
The average hip/knee extensor moment ratio (HKR) was calculated during squat descent, and trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle at peak knee flexion. A regression tree for repeated measures determined what combination of trunk-tibia inclination difference and knee flexion angle predicted HKR.
Results
HKR was predicted by trunk-tibia inclination difference (primary predictor) and knee flexion (secondary predictor). Four squatting strategies emerged: knee extensor bias (average HKR = 0.3), neutral bias (average HKR = 0.9), hip extensor bias (average HKR = 1.5), and high hip extensor bias (average HKR = 2.2). When trunk inclination exceeded tibia inclination ( ≥ 2.2°), hip-biased squatting was evident. Squat depth affected only hip-biased squatting: high hip extensor bias at moderate depths (<96° knee flexion), and a less pronounced hip bias at greater depths ( ≥ 96° knee flexion).
Conclusions
Our results provide a framework to bias the squat exercise based on intent. To maximize or minimize hip relative to knee extensor demands, clinicians should be cognizant of the trunk inclination relative to tibia inclination and the influence of knee flexion.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science.
The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.