Yutian Xin, Zeyu Ou, Peilin Xie, Xun lv, Wenzhen Liu, Baoquan Zhang, Xiaolong Zhao, Klaus von Gadow, Xiaolong Shi, Lu Liu, Pan Wan
{"title":"不同经营方式下西北次生栎林凋落叶和细根分解动态及驱动因素","authors":"Yutian Xin, Zeyu Ou, Peilin Xie, Xun lv, Wenzhen Liu, Baoquan Zhang, Xiaolong Zhao, Klaus von Gadow, Xiaolong Shi, Lu Liu, Pan Wan","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07394-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>The aim of the study was to evaluate how different forest management practices influence litter decomposition dynamics and nutrient release patterns, focusing on the relationship between forest management, soil conditions, and decomposition processes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>An experiment was conducted in secondary oak forests in the western Qinling Mountains of China using the litterbag decomposition methods to assess soil physicochemical properties and decomposition processes following three distinct forest management practices (details in supplementary).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The results show that Structure-based Forest Management (SBFM) and Target Tree Forest Management (TTFM) significantly accelerated litter decomposition and P release, while Secondary Forest Comprehensive Silviculture (SFCS) inhibited these processes. Specifically, leaf litter decomposed at a faster rate compared to fine roots, whereas fine roots exhibited a more rapid release of N and P. The rates of decomposition were influenced by various factors including soil physicochemical properties, microbial activity, and enzyme presence. In particular, soil total phosphorus (TP) and acid phosphatase (ACP) played a critical role in promoting litter mass loss and nutrient release. Conversely, soil total nitrogen (TN) and water content significantly impacted the release of C and N, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>SBFM and TTFM enhanced litter decomposition and nutrient cycling by improving TP and ACP activity, whereas SFCS suppressed these processes. Leaf litter tends to conserve N and P strategy, while fine roots opt for a C conservation strategy. These results highlight the critical role of forest management in regulating decomposition through soil condition modification, providing actionable insights for sustainable forestry.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decomposition dynamics and driving factors of leaf litter and fine roots decomposition in secondary oak forests following different management practices in Northwestern China\",\"authors\":\"Yutian Xin, Zeyu Ou, Peilin Xie, Xun lv, Wenzhen Liu, Baoquan Zhang, Xiaolong Zhao, Klaus von Gadow, Xiaolong Shi, Lu Liu, Pan Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-025-07394-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Aims</h3><p>The aim of the study was to evaluate how different forest management practices influence litter decomposition dynamics and nutrient release patterns, focusing on the relationship between forest management, soil conditions, and decomposition processes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>An experiment was conducted in secondary oak forests in the western Qinling Mountains of China using the litterbag decomposition methods to assess soil physicochemical properties and decomposition processes following three distinct forest management practices (details in supplementary).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The results show that Structure-based Forest Management (SBFM) and Target Tree Forest Management (TTFM) significantly accelerated litter decomposition and P release, while Secondary Forest Comprehensive Silviculture (SFCS) inhibited these processes. Specifically, leaf litter decomposed at a faster rate compared to fine roots, whereas fine roots exhibited a more rapid release of N and P. The rates of decomposition were influenced by various factors including soil physicochemical properties, microbial activity, and enzyme presence. In particular, soil total phosphorus (TP) and acid phosphatase (ACP) played a critical role in promoting litter mass loss and nutrient release. Conversely, soil total nitrogen (TN) and water content significantly impacted the release of C and N, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>SBFM and TTFM enhanced litter decomposition and nutrient cycling by improving TP and ACP activity, whereas SFCS suppressed these processes. Leaf litter tends to conserve N and P strategy, while fine roots opt for a C conservation strategy. These results highlight the critical role of forest management in regulating decomposition through soil condition modification, providing actionable insights for sustainable forestry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07394-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07394-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decomposition dynamics and driving factors of leaf litter and fine roots decomposition in secondary oak forests following different management practices in Northwestern China
Aims
The aim of the study was to evaluate how different forest management practices influence litter decomposition dynamics and nutrient release patterns, focusing on the relationship between forest management, soil conditions, and decomposition processes.
Methods
An experiment was conducted in secondary oak forests in the western Qinling Mountains of China using the litterbag decomposition methods to assess soil physicochemical properties and decomposition processes following three distinct forest management practices (details in supplementary).
Results
The results show that Structure-based Forest Management (SBFM) and Target Tree Forest Management (TTFM) significantly accelerated litter decomposition and P release, while Secondary Forest Comprehensive Silviculture (SFCS) inhibited these processes. Specifically, leaf litter decomposed at a faster rate compared to fine roots, whereas fine roots exhibited a more rapid release of N and P. The rates of decomposition were influenced by various factors including soil physicochemical properties, microbial activity, and enzyme presence. In particular, soil total phosphorus (TP) and acid phosphatase (ACP) played a critical role in promoting litter mass loss and nutrient release. Conversely, soil total nitrogen (TN) and water content significantly impacted the release of C and N, respectively.
Conclusions
SBFM and TTFM enhanced litter decomposition and nutrient cycling by improving TP and ACP activity, whereas SFCS suppressed these processes. Leaf litter tends to conserve N and P strategy, while fine roots opt for a C conservation strategy. These results highlight the critical role of forest management in regulating decomposition through soil condition modification, providing actionable insights for sustainable forestry.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.