利用低挂的果实:重新润湿未管理的边缘有机土壤,以实现最大限度的温室气体减排

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Haonan Guo, Shihao Cui, Claudia Kalla Nielsen, Lin Tang, Lorenzo Pugliese, Shubiao Wu
{"title":"利用低挂的果实:重新润湿未管理的边缘有机土壤,以实现最大限度的温室气体减排","authors":"Haonan Guo, Shihao Cui, Claudia Kalla Nielsen, Lin Tang, Lorenzo Pugliese, Shubiao Wu","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c12572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rewetting drained peatlands is a promising strategy for mitigating carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, transforming these areas from carbon sources to sinks. Despite the well-known climate benefits, practical implementation is often hampered by conflicts between environmental goals and farmers’ economic interests. Identifying optimal rewetting locations that maximize greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction while minimizing agricultural disruption is crucial to advancing this process. However, there is currently limited scientific evidence to guide these decisions. To identify “low-hanging fruits”, 12 sites were selected for 4-month incubations to investigate the effects of four land uses (grass-cut, grass-graze, arable, and unmanaged) on CO<sub>2</sub> and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions postrewetting. Results showed that unmanaged sites exhibited the highest potential for GHG reduction (2015 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>–2</sup> day<sup>–1</sup>, 89.9%), followed by grass-graze, grass-cut, and arable sites, reflecting a gradient of management intensity. These insights suggest that prioritizing rewetting of unmanaged areas while delaying interventions on arable lands could yield greater climate benefits and enhance farmers’ acceptance. Additionally, emission variability across sites was linked to soil properties, indicating that soils with a higher organic carbon content (for greater CO<sub>2</sub> reduction) and lower bacterial diversity (for reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production) offer the greatest GHG reduction potential. This study provides crucial scientific evidence to guide targeted peatland rewetting efforts, supporting net-zero emission goals.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing the Low-Hanging Fruits: Rewetting Unmanaged Marginal Organic Soils to Achieve Maximal Greenhouse Gas Reduction\",\"authors\":\"Haonan Guo, Shihao Cui, Claudia Kalla Nielsen, Lin Tang, Lorenzo Pugliese, Shubiao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c12572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rewetting drained peatlands is a promising strategy for mitigating carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, transforming these areas from carbon sources to sinks. Despite the well-known climate benefits, practical implementation is often hampered by conflicts between environmental goals and farmers’ economic interests. Identifying optimal rewetting locations that maximize greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction while minimizing agricultural disruption is crucial to advancing this process. However, there is currently limited scientific evidence to guide these decisions. To identify “low-hanging fruits”, 12 sites were selected for 4-month incubations to investigate the effects of four land uses (grass-cut, grass-graze, arable, and unmanaged) on CO<sub>2</sub> and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions postrewetting. Results showed that unmanaged sites exhibited the highest potential for GHG reduction (2015 mg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>–2</sup> day<sup>–1</sup>, 89.9%), followed by grass-graze, grass-cut, and arable sites, reflecting a gradient of management intensity. These insights suggest that prioritizing rewetting of unmanaged areas while delaying interventions on arable lands could yield greater climate benefits and enhance farmers’ acceptance. Additionally, emission variability across sites was linked to soil properties, indicating that soils with a higher organic carbon content (for greater CO<sub>2</sub> reduction) and lower bacterial diversity (for reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production) offer the greatest GHG reduction potential. This study provides crucial scientific evidence to guide targeted peatland rewetting efforts, supporting net-zero emission goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12572\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重新湿润排干的泥炭地是一种很有前景的减少二氧化碳排放的策略,将这些地区从碳源转变为碳汇。尽管众所周知的气候效益,但实际实施往往受到环境目标与农民经济利益之间冲突的阻碍。确定最佳的再湿润地点,最大限度地减少温室气体(GHG)的排放,同时最大限度地减少对农业的干扰,对于推进这一进程至关重要。然而,目前指导这些决定的科学证据有限。为了找到“容易摘到的果实”,我们选择了12个地点进行为期4个月的孵化,研究四种土地利用方式(割草、放牧、耕地和无管理)对湿润后二氧化碳和甲烷(CH4)排放的影响。结果表明:非管理地温室气体减排潜力最大(2015 mg CO2-eq m-2 day-1, 89.9%),放牧地次之,割草地次之,耕地地次之,管理强度呈梯度变化;这些见解表明,优先恢复未管理地区的湿润,同时推迟对耕地的干预,可能会产生更大的气候效益,并提高农民的接受度。此外,不同地点的排放变异性与土壤性质有关,表明有机碳含量较高(减少更多的二氧化碳)和细菌多样性较低(减少CH4的产生)的土壤具有最大的温室气体减排潜力。该研究为指导有针对性的泥炭地再湿润工作,支持净零排放目标提供了重要的科学证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Harnessing the Low-Hanging Fruits: Rewetting Unmanaged Marginal Organic Soils to Achieve Maximal Greenhouse Gas Reduction

Harnessing the Low-Hanging Fruits: Rewetting Unmanaged Marginal Organic Soils to Achieve Maximal Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Rewetting drained peatlands is a promising strategy for mitigating carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, transforming these areas from carbon sources to sinks. Despite the well-known climate benefits, practical implementation is often hampered by conflicts between environmental goals and farmers’ economic interests. Identifying optimal rewetting locations that maximize greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction while minimizing agricultural disruption is crucial to advancing this process. However, there is currently limited scientific evidence to guide these decisions. To identify “low-hanging fruits”, 12 sites were selected for 4-month incubations to investigate the effects of four land uses (grass-cut, grass-graze, arable, and unmanaged) on CO2 and methane (CH4) emissions postrewetting. Results showed that unmanaged sites exhibited the highest potential for GHG reduction (2015 mg CO2-eq m–2 day–1, 89.9%), followed by grass-graze, grass-cut, and arable sites, reflecting a gradient of management intensity. These insights suggest that prioritizing rewetting of unmanaged areas while delaying interventions on arable lands could yield greater climate benefits and enhance farmers’ acceptance. Additionally, emission variability across sites was linked to soil properties, indicating that soils with a higher organic carbon content (for greater CO2 reduction) and lower bacterial diversity (for reduced CH4 production) offer the greatest GHG reduction potential. This study provides crucial scientific evidence to guide targeted peatland rewetting efforts, supporting net-zero emission goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信