预测中国人口死亡率的生物年龄结构

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kaiyue Wang, Jingli Gao, Ying Liu, Zuyun Liu, Yaqi Li, Shuohua Chen, Liang Sun, Shouling Wu, Xiang Gao
{"title":"预测中国人口死亡率的生物年龄结构","authors":"Kaiyue Wang, Jingli Gao, Ying Liu, Zuyun Liu, Yaqi Li, Shuohua Chen, Liang Sun, Shouling Wu, Xiang Gao","doi":"10.1007/s11357-025-01612-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efforts to increase health span bring to light the necessity of constructing biological age (BA) for measuring aging. However, universally adaptive BA needs further investigation, especially among the Chinese population. Therefore, this study aimed to construct BA using routine clinical markers for the Chinese population. Included were two Chinese prospective cohorts, the Kailuan Study I (<i>n</i> = 83,571) for developing BA and the Kailuan Study II (<i>n</i> = 21,229) for validation. Leveraging baseline age-related clinical markers, we developed phenotypic BA (Pheno-Age) using Levine’s methods and Klemera-Doubal BA (KDM-Age) using KDM methods and calculated the residuals of regressions of the two BA measured at baseline and during follow-up on chronological age, namely BA acceleration. The predictive performance of baseline, cumulative average, and updated BAs on mortality was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots. COX regressions were used to estimate hazard rations (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the BA acceleration and risk of mortality. During 1,443,857 person-years of follow-up, 12,679 deaths were recorded in the two cohorts. Baseline Pheno-Age and KDM-Age produced desirable predictions for mortality in both the Kailuan Study I (AUC, 0.810 and 0.806, respectively) and the Kailuan Study II (AUC, 0.867 and 0.819, respectively). Calibration plots showed reasonable agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. The pooled multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for per standard deviation increment of baseline Pheno-Age acceleration and mortality was 1.24 (1.18, 1.30), and for KDM-Age acceleration was 1.16 (1.10, 1.21). Similar predictive performance and association were observed when using cumulative average or updated BA. The associations were stronger in the adults aged ≤60 years, smokers, and drinkers, relative to their counterparts (<i>P</i> for interaction &lt;0.05 for all). Pheno-Age and KDM-Age, developed and validated in the two large prospective cohorts, could predict mortality, independent of chronological age and other potential confounders, in Chinese populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological age construction for prediction of mortality in the Chinese population\",\"authors\":\"Kaiyue Wang, Jingli Gao, Ying Liu, Zuyun Liu, Yaqi Li, Shuohua Chen, Liang Sun, Shouling Wu, Xiang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11357-025-01612-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Efforts to increase health span bring to light the necessity of constructing biological age (BA) for measuring aging. However, universally adaptive BA needs further investigation, especially among the Chinese population. Therefore, this study aimed to construct BA using routine clinical markers for the Chinese population. Included were two Chinese prospective cohorts, the Kailuan Study I (<i>n</i> = 83,571) for developing BA and the Kailuan Study II (<i>n</i> = 21,229) for validation. Leveraging baseline age-related clinical markers, we developed phenotypic BA (Pheno-Age) using Levine’s methods and Klemera-Doubal BA (KDM-Age) using KDM methods and calculated the residuals of regressions of the two BA measured at baseline and during follow-up on chronological age, namely BA acceleration. The predictive performance of baseline, cumulative average, and updated BAs on mortality was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots. COX regressions were used to estimate hazard rations (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the BA acceleration and risk of mortality. During 1,443,857 person-years of follow-up, 12,679 deaths were recorded in the two cohorts. Baseline Pheno-Age and KDM-Age produced desirable predictions for mortality in both the Kailuan Study I (AUC, 0.810 and 0.806, respectively) and the Kailuan Study II (AUC, 0.867 and 0.819, respectively). Calibration plots showed reasonable agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. The pooled multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for per standard deviation increment of baseline Pheno-Age acceleration and mortality was 1.24 (1.18, 1.30), and for KDM-Age acceleration was 1.16 (1.10, 1.21). Similar predictive performance and association were observed when using cumulative average or updated BA. The associations were stronger in the adults aged ≤60 years, smokers, and drinkers, relative to their counterparts (<i>P</i> for interaction &lt;0.05 for all). Pheno-Age and KDM-Age, developed and validated in the two large prospective cohorts, could predict mortality, independent of chronological age and other potential confounders, in Chinese populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeroScience\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeroScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01612-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01612-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着健康寿命的不断延长,构建生物年龄(BA)来测量衰老的必要性日益凸显。然而,普遍适应的BA还需要进一步的研究,特别是在中国人群中。因此,本研究旨在利用中国人群的常规临床标志物构建BA。​利用基线年龄相关临床标志物,我们使用Levine的方法开发了表型BA (Pheno-Age),使用KDM方法开发了klemera - double BA (KDM- age),并计算了基线和随访期间测量的两种BA的回归残差,即BA加速。使用曲线下面积(AUC)和校准图评估基线、累积平均值和更新BAs对死亡率的预测性能。COX回归用于估计BA加速和死亡风险的危害比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。在14443857人年的随访期间,两个队列中记录了12679例死亡。基线Pheno-Age和KDM-Age在开滦研究I (AUC分别为0.810和0.806)和开滦研究II (AUC分别为0.867和0.819)中都产生了理想的死亡率预测。校正图显示预测概率与观测概率基本一致。基线Pheno-Age加速和死亡率的每标准差增量的合并多变量调整hr (95% ci)为1.24 (1.18,1.30),KDM-Age加速为1.16(1.10,1.21)。当使用累积平均或更新BA时,观察到类似的预测性能和关联。与同龄人群相比,年龄≤60岁的成年人、吸烟者和饮酒者的相关性更强(P为相互作用P < 0.05)。Pheno-Age和KDM-Age在两个大型前瞻性队列中发展和验证,可以预测中国人群的死亡率,独立于实足年龄和其他潜在混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biological age construction for prediction of mortality in the Chinese population

Efforts to increase health span bring to light the necessity of constructing biological age (BA) for measuring aging. However, universally adaptive BA needs further investigation, especially among the Chinese population. Therefore, this study aimed to construct BA using routine clinical markers for the Chinese population. Included were two Chinese prospective cohorts, the Kailuan Study I (n = 83,571) for developing BA and the Kailuan Study II (n = 21,229) for validation. Leveraging baseline age-related clinical markers, we developed phenotypic BA (Pheno-Age) using Levine’s methods and Klemera-Doubal BA (KDM-Age) using KDM methods and calculated the residuals of regressions of the two BA measured at baseline and during follow-up on chronological age, namely BA acceleration. The predictive performance of baseline, cumulative average, and updated BAs on mortality was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots. COX regressions were used to estimate hazard rations (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the BA acceleration and risk of mortality. During 1,443,857 person-years of follow-up, 12,679 deaths were recorded in the two cohorts. Baseline Pheno-Age and KDM-Age produced desirable predictions for mortality in both the Kailuan Study I (AUC, 0.810 and 0.806, respectively) and the Kailuan Study II (AUC, 0.867 and 0.819, respectively). Calibration plots showed reasonable agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. The pooled multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for per standard deviation increment of baseline Pheno-Age acceleration and mortality was 1.24 (1.18, 1.30), and for KDM-Age acceleration was 1.16 (1.10, 1.21). Similar predictive performance and association were observed when using cumulative average or updated BA. The associations were stronger in the adults aged ≤60 years, smokers, and drinkers, relative to their counterparts (P for interaction <0.05 for all). Pheno-Age and KDM-Age, developed and validated in the two large prospective cohorts, could predict mortality, independent of chronological age and other potential confounders, in Chinese populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信