早期先发制人的肾移植不提供任何死亡率的好处:过去二十年来先发制人的肾移植趋势的研究。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Abhishek Kumar , Levi Bonnell , Sarat Kuppachi
{"title":"早期先发制人的肾移植不提供任何死亡率的好处:过去二十年来先发制人的肾移植趋势的研究。","authors":"Abhishek Kumar ,&nbsp;Levi Bonnell ,&nbsp;Sarat Kuppachi","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pre-emptive kidney transplantation is considered the optimal treatment for end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The aim of the study is to evaluate current state of pre-emptive kidney transplants in the United States with focus on mortality benefit with early pre-emptive transplants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we explored trends in pre-emptive kidney transplantation in first time adult recipients. We created four groups (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] &lt; 10 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 10 to &lt; 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 15 to &lt; 20 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and ≥ 20 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) based on the eGFR at the time of transplant. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the difference in mortality and cumulative incidence competing risk (CICR) method was used to compare risk of ESKD among the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pre-emptive kidney transplant remain at roughly 18% of total kidney transplant (33% were from deceased donors and 67% from living donors). White patients with a higher level of education and with private insurance were most likely to receive pre-emptive kidney transplant. No difference in mortality was found in the four eGFR groups. In a subgroup analysis looking only at recipients of pre-emptive kidney transplant from living donors, no mortality difference was again noted among the four groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pre-emptive kidney transplants continue to favor a select population and remain at low numbers (9% of total deceased donor kidney transplants and 33% of living donor kidney transplants [LDKTs]). Early pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant did not confer a mortality benefit compared to transplantation when eGFR was &lt; 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 4","pages":"Pages 538-543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplant Does Not Offer Any Mortality Benefits: A Study of Trends in Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplantation Over the Last Two Decades\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Kumar ,&nbsp;Levi Bonnell ,&nbsp;Sarat Kuppachi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.02.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pre-emptive kidney transplantation is considered the optimal treatment for end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The aim of the study is to evaluate current state of pre-emptive kidney transplants in the United States with focus on mortality benefit with early pre-emptive transplants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we explored trends in pre-emptive kidney transplantation in first time adult recipients. We created four groups (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] &lt; 10 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 10 to &lt; 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 15 to &lt; 20 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and ≥ 20 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) based on the eGFR at the time of transplant. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the difference in mortality and cumulative incidence competing risk (CICR) method was used to compare risk of ESKD among the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pre-emptive kidney transplant remain at roughly 18% of total kidney transplant (33% were from deceased donors and 67% from living donors). White patients with a higher level of education and with private insurance were most likely to receive pre-emptive kidney transplant. No difference in mortality was found in the four eGFR groups. In a subgroup analysis looking only at recipients of pre-emptive kidney transplant from living donors, no mortality difference was again noted among the four groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pre-emptive kidney transplants continue to favor a select population and remain at low numbers (9% of total deceased donor kidney transplants and 33% of living donor kidney transplants [LDKTs]). Early pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant did not confer a mortality benefit compared to transplantation when eGFR was &lt; 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 538-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525001459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525001459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先发制人的肾移植被认为是终末期肾病(ESKD)的最佳治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估美国先发制人肾移植的现状,重点关注早期先发制人肾移植的死亡率。方法:利用美国器官共享网络数据库,探讨成人首次肾移植的趋势。我们根据移植时的肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate, eGFR)分为四组(估计肾小球滤过率[eGFR] < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2, 10至< 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, 15至< 20 mL/min/1.73 m2和≥20 mL/min/1.73 m2)。采用多变量Cox回归评估死亡率差异,采用累积发病竞争风险(CICR)方法比较各组间ESKD风险。结果:先发制人的肾移植仍约占肾移植总数的18%(33%来自已故供者,67%来自活体供者)。受教育程度较高且有私人保险的白人患者最有可能接受先发制人的肾脏移植。在四个eGFR组中,死亡率没有发现差异。在一项亚组分析中,仅观察活体肾移植的接受者,四组之间的死亡率没有差异。结论:先发制人的肾移植仍然有利于特定人群,且数量较少(占总死亡供体肾移植的9%,占活体供体肾移植的33% [LDKTs])。当eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2时,早期活体肾移植与移植相比没有死亡率优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplant Does Not Offer Any Mortality Benefits: A Study of Trends in Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplantation Over the Last Two Decades

Background

Pre-emptive kidney transplantation is considered the optimal treatment for end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The aim of the study is to evaluate current state of pre-emptive kidney transplants in the United States with focus on mortality benefit with early pre-emptive transplants.

Methods

Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we explored trends in pre-emptive kidney transplantation in first time adult recipients. We created four groups (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2, 10 to < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, 15 to < 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ≥ 20 mL/min/1.73 m2) based on the eGFR at the time of transplant. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the difference in mortality and cumulative incidence competing risk (CICR) method was used to compare risk of ESKD among the groups.

Results

Pre-emptive kidney transplant remain at roughly 18% of total kidney transplant (33% were from deceased donors and 67% from living donors). White patients with a higher level of education and with private insurance were most likely to receive pre-emptive kidney transplant. No difference in mortality was found in the four eGFR groups. In a subgroup analysis looking only at recipients of pre-emptive kidney transplant from living donors, no mortality difference was again noted among the four groups.

Conclusions

Pre-emptive kidney transplants continue to favor a select population and remain at low numbers (9% of total deceased donor kidney transplants and 33% of living donor kidney transplants [LDKTs]). Early pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant did not confer a mortality benefit compared to transplantation when eGFR was < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信