基于磁共振成像的放射学模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者术中大出血的风险。

Bingjie Ye, Chenyu Chen, Ke Su, Rujia Fan, Bo Yuan
{"title":"基于磁共振成像的放射学模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者术中大出血的风险。","authors":"Bingjie Ye, Chenyu Chen, Ke Su, Rujia Fan, Bo Yuan","doi":"10.5603/gpl.102853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic models to predict the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>CSP patients (n = 126) from Center 1 were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio into a training set (n = 88) and an internal validation set (n = 38), and patients (n = 32) from Center 2 into an external validation set. Afterward, the clinical and radiomic features related to intraoperative massive hemorrhage were fed into the k-nearest Neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), and Multi- Layer Perception (MLP) to construct predictive clinical, radiomic, and combinatorial models. The performance of these models was assessed using area under curve (AUC), Delong's test, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Youden's index was used to determine the optimal threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven radiomic characteristics were found to be substantially linked to intraoperative massive hemorrhage. The combined in the gestational sac and peripheral to the gestational sac (IP) model (AUC = 0.959), constructed by MLP, had the best performance, with an optimal risk threshold of 0.180, as compared to the clinical model (AUC = 0.500) and the nomogram (AUC = 0.283). DCA and calibration curves demonstrated the IP model's good clinical predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IP model for CSP was superior to the other models in this study in predicting the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage, which was significantly increased when the risk threshold exceeded 0.180. The model may help clinicians make individualized treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomic model to predict the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Bingjie Ye, Chenyu Chen, Ke Su, Rujia Fan, Bo Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/gpl.102853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic models to predict the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>CSP patients (n = 126) from Center 1 were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio into a training set (n = 88) and an internal validation set (n = 38), and patients (n = 32) from Center 2 into an external validation set. Afterward, the clinical and radiomic features related to intraoperative massive hemorrhage were fed into the k-nearest Neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), and Multi- Layer Perception (MLP) to construct predictive clinical, radiomic, and combinatorial models. The performance of these models was assessed using area under curve (AUC), Delong's test, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Youden's index was used to determine the optimal threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven radiomic characteristics were found to be substantially linked to intraoperative massive hemorrhage. The combined in the gestational sac and peripheral to the gestational sac (IP) model (AUC = 0.959), constructed by MLP, had the best performance, with an optimal risk threshold of 0.180, as compared to the clinical model (AUC = 0.500) and the nomogram (AUC = 0.283). DCA and calibration curves demonstrated the IP model's good clinical predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IP model for CSP was superior to the other models in this study in predicting the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage, which was significantly increased when the risk threshold exceeded 0.180. The model may help clinicians make individualized treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginekologia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.102853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.102853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立基于磁共振成像(MRI)的放射学模型,预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)患者术中大出血的风险。材料和方法:中心1的CSP患者(n = 126)按7:3的比例随机分配到训练集(n = 88)和内部验证集(n = 38),中心2的患者(n = 32)进入外部验证集。然后,将术中大出血相关的临床和放射学特征输入到k近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、光梯度增强机(Light Gradient Boosting machine, Light GBM)和多层感知(Multi- Layer Perception, MLP)中,构建预测临床、放射学和组合模型。采用曲线下面积(AUC)、德龙检验(Delong’s test)、决策曲线分析(DCA)和校准曲线对这些模型的性能进行评估。采用约登指数确定最佳阈值。结果:发现11个放射学特征与术中大出血密切相关。与临床模型(AUC = 0.500)和nomogram (AUC = 0.283)相比,MLP构建的妊娠囊内与妊娠囊外周(IP)联合模型(AUC = 0.959)的最佳风险阈值为0.180,表现最佳。DCA和标定曲线显示IP模型具有良好的临床预测性能。结论:CSP的IP模型在预测术中大出血风险方面优于本研究中其他模型,当风险阈值超过0.180时,CSP的术中大出血风险显著增加。该模型可以帮助临床医生做出个性化的治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomic model to predict the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.

Objectives: Development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic models to predict the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

Material and methods: CSP patients (n = 126) from Center 1 were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio into a training set (n = 88) and an internal validation set (n = 38), and patients (n = 32) from Center 2 into an external validation set. Afterward, the clinical and radiomic features related to intraoperative massive hemorrhage were fed into the k-nearest Neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), and Multi- Layer Perception (MLP) to construct predictive clinical, radiomic, and combinatorial models. The performance of these models was assessed using area under curve (AUC), Delong's test, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Youden's index was used to determine the optimal threshold.

Results: Eleven radiomic characteristics were found to be substantially linked to intraoperative massive hemorrhage. The combined in the gestational sac and peripheral to the gestational sac (IP) model (AUC = 0.959), constructed by MLP, had the best performance, with an optimal risk threshold of 0.180, as compared to the clinical model (AUC = 0.500) and the nomogram (AUC = 0.283). DCA and calibration curves demonstrated the IP model's good clinical predictive performance.

Conclusions: The IP model for CSP was superior to the other models in this study in predicting the risk of intraoperative massive hemorrhage, which was significantly increased when the risk threshold exceeded 0.180. The model may help clinicians make individualized treatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信