在考虑虚拟韧带的情况下,将患者的胫股运动学和负荷转移到六自由度(6-DOF)关节模拟器。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Paul Henke, Leo Ruehrmund, Jessica Hembus, Sven Krueger, Rainer Bader, Maeruan Kebbach
{"title":"在考虑虚拟韧带的情况下,将患者的胫股运动学和负荷转移到六自由度(6-DOF)关节模拟器。","authors":"Paul Henke, Leo Ruehrmund, Jessica Hembus, Sven Krueger, Rainer Bader, Maeruan Kebbach","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-95400-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preclinical testing of total knee replacements (TKR) is crucial for evaluating new implant designs. Dynamic experimental testing focus mostly on level walking and squats, failing to represent a full range of daily activities. Moreover, the contribution of the ligament apparatus is often simplified. Therefore, this study transferred five daily activity load cases-level walking, downhill walking, stair descent, squat, and sit-to-stand-onto a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator with a cruciate-retaining bicondylar TKR and a virtual ligament apparatus. Forces and kinematics were based on telemetric data from an ultra-congruent TKR. The resulting kinematics, kinetics, and tibiofemoral contact surfaces were evaluated. Additionally, variations of the virtual ligament apparatus on the joint simulator, e.g. resection of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), have been used to assess its influence on the resulting joint dynamics. Results showed that tibiofemoral contact area was more influenced by dynamics than kinematics. Virtual PCL resection shifted the tibia posteriorly (up to 3 mm) and increased abduction (up to 0.5°). Different results were seen across all load cases. The exceptions are the squat and sit-to-stand load cases with similar patterns. Thus, cruciate-retaining TKR can be tested using telemetric data from ultra-congruent TKR, aiding in comprehensive evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"10512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfer of patients' tibiofemoral kinematics and loads to a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator under consideration of virtual ligaments.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Henke, Leo Ruehrmund, Jessica Hembus, Sven Krueger, Rainer Bader, Maeruan Kebbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-95400-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Preclinical testing of total knee replacements (TKR) is crucial for evaluating new implant designs. Dynamic experimental testing focus mostly on level walking and squats, failing to represent a full range of daily activities. Moreover, the contribution of the ligament apparatus is often simplified. Therefore, this study transferred five daily activity load cases-level walking, downhill walking, stair descent, squat, and sit-to-stand-onto a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator with a cruciate-retaining bicondylar TKR and a virtual ligament apparatus. Forces and kinematics were based on telemetric data from an ultra-congruent TKR. The resulting kinematics, kinetics, and tibiofemoral contact surfaces were evaluated. Additionally, variations of the virtual ligament apparatus on the joint simulator, e.g. resection of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), have been used to assess its influence on the resulting joint dynamics. Results showed that tibiofemoral contact area was more influenced by dynamics than kinematics. Virtual PCL resection shifted the tibia posteriorly (up to 3 mm) and increased abduction (up to 0.5°). Different results were seen across all load cases. The exceptions are the squat and sit-to-stand load cases with similar patterns. Thus, cruciate-retaining TKR can be tested using telemetric data from ultra-congruent TKR, aiding in comprehensive evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"10512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95400-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95400-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全膝关节置换术(TKR)的临床前测试是评估新植入物设计的关键。动态实验测试主要集中在水平行走和深蹲,不能代表全方位的日常活动。此外,韧带装置的作用常常被简化。因此,本研究将五种日常活动负荷(水平行走、下坡道行走、下楼梯、深蹲和坐立)转移到一个六自由度(6-DOF)关节模拟器上,该模拟器带有一个保留十字架的双髁TKR和一个虚拟韧带装置。力和运动学是基于遥测数据从一个超一致的TKR。由此产生的运动学、动力学和胫股接触面进行了评估。此外,关节模拟器上虚拟韧带装置的变化,例如切除后交叉韧带(PCL),已被用于评估其对所得关节动力学的影响。结果表明,胫股接触面积受动力学影响大于运动学影响。虚拟PCL切除术使胫骨向后移位(最多3mm)并增加外展(最多0.5°)。在所有负载情况下可以看到不同的结果。例外的是深蹲和坐立载荷情况与类似的模式。因此,可以使用来自超全等TKR的遥测数据来测试保留十字架的TKR,从而帮助进行综合评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Transfer of patients' tibiofemoral kinematics and loads to a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator under consideration of virtual ligaments.

Transfer of patients' tibiofemoral kinematics and loads to a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator under consideration of virtual ligaments.

Transfer of patients' tibiofemoral kinematics and loads to a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator under consideration of virtual ligaments.

Transfer of patients' tibiofemoral kinematics and loads to a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator under consideration of virtual ligaments.

Preclinical testing of total knee replacements (TKR) is crucial for evaluating new implant designs. Dynamic experimental testing focus mostly on level walking and squats, failing to represent a full range of daily activities. Moreover, the contribution of the ligament apparatus is often simplified. Therefore, this study transferred five daily activity load cases-level walking, downhill walking, stair descent, squat, and sit-to-stand-onto a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator with a cruciate-retaining bicondylar TKR and a virtual ligament apparatus. Forces and kinematics were based on telemetric data from an ultra-congruent TKR. The resulting kinematics, kinetics, and tibiofemoral contact surfaces were evaluated. Additionally, variations of the virtual ligament apparatus on the joint simulator, e.g. resection of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), have been used to assess its influence on the resulting joint dynamics. Results showed that tibiofemoral contact area was more influenced by dynamics than kinematics. Virtual PCL resection shifted the tibia posteriorly (up to 3 mm) and increased abduction (up to 0.5°). Different results were seen across all load cases. The exceptions are the squat and sit-to-stand load cases with similar patterns. Thus, cruciate-retaining TKR can be tested using telemetric data from ultra-congruent TKR, aiding in comprehensive evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信