共聚焦激光内镜检查中急性食物诱发反应的观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性:一项国际多中心验证研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1111/nmo.70031
Lukas Michaja Balsiger, Tom van Gils, Yaser Hatem, Amanda Blomsten, Karlien Raymenants, Cedric Van de Bruaene, Leila Juvyns, Johann P Hreinsson, Tim Vanuytsel, Hans Törnblom, Christian Sina, Magnus Simren, Jan Tack
{"title":"共聚焦激光内镜检查中急性食物诱发反应的观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性:一项国际多中心验证研究。","authors":"Lukas Michaja Balsiger, Tom van Gils, Yaser Hatem, Amanda Blomsten, Karlien Raymenants, Cedric Van de Bruaene, Leila Juvyns, Johann P Hreinsson, Tim Vanuytsel, Hans Törnblom, Christian Sina, Magnus Simren, Jan Tack","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of the duodenal mucosa and has shown acute food-triggered disruption of the duodenal epithelial barrier of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The interpretation of the recordings is subjective, with unknown agreement rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the intra- and interobserver variability of this technique.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An international multicenter study was performed, including pCLE recordings from three centers. Recordings were randomized and re-evaluated by five blinded experienced assessors. Low-quality recordings were excluded. The mucosa was considered altered if both fluorescein leakage and luminal particles were observed. Agreement was quantified using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa (κ). Reference videos (i.e., videos with 100% agreement) were used to assess the optimal characteristics of videos needed to make a judgment based on the optimal receiver operating characteristic curve cutoff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 119 individual recordings, 87 could be used for analyses (total of 86,408 frames). Intraindividual agreement rate was 80%-100%, whereas the interindividual agreement rate was 85% (κ = 0.68). The agreement rate with the endoscopist ranged 54%-95% (κ = 0.15-0.89). The optimal cutoff to distinguish altered from unaltered was by observing alterations in ≥ 2 out of 6 mucosal spots (100% sensitivity and specificity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed a substantial to perfect intraobserver agreement and a substantial interobserver agreement for the judgment of acute food-triggered disruption of the duodenal epithelial barrier by pCLE, confirming that this real-time readout is reliable and reproducible.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Acute Food-Induced Reactions During Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: An International Multicenter Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Michaja Balsiger, Tom van Gils, Yaser Hatem, Amanda Blomsten, Karlien Raymenants, Cedric Van de Bruaene, Leila Juvyns, Johann P Hreinsson, Tim Vanuytsel, Hans Törnblom, Christian Sina, Magnus Simren, Jan Tack\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of the duodenal mucosa and has shown acute food-triggered disruption of the duodenal epithelial barrier of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The interpretation of the recordings is subjective, with unknown agreement rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the intra- and interobserver variability of this technique.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An international multicenter study was performed, including pCLE recordings from three centers. Recordings were randomized and re-evaluated by five blinded experienced assessors. Low-quality recordings were excluded. The mucosa was considered altered if both fluorescein leakage and luminal particles were observed. Agreement was quantified using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa (κ). Reference videos (i.e., videos with 100% agreement) were used to assess the optimal characteristics of videos needed to make a judgment based on the optimal receiver operating characteristic curve cutoff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 119 individual recordings, 87 could be used for analyses (total of 86,408 frames). Intraindividual agreement rate was 80%-100%, whereas the interindividual agreement rate was 85% (κ = 0.68). The agreement rate with the endoscopist ranged 54%-95% (κ = 0.15-0.89). The optimal cutoff to distinguish altered from unaltered was by observing alterations in ≥ 2 out of 6 mucosal spots (100% sensitivity and specificity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed a substantial to perfect intraobserver agreement and a substantial interobserver agreement for the judgment of acute food-triggered disruption of the duodenal epithelial barrier by pCLE, confirming that this real-time readout is reliable and reproducible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:基于探针的共聚焦激光内镜(pCLE)实现了十二指肠黏膜的实时显微可视化,并显示了肠易激综合征(IBS)患者急性食物引发的十二指肠上皮屏障破坏。对录音的解释是主观的,一致性是未知的。本研究的目的是调查该技术在观察者内部和观察者之间的可变性。患者和方法:进行了一项国际多中心研究,包括来自三个中心的pCLE记录。录音被随机化并由五名有经验的盲法评估者重新评估。排除了低质量的录音。如果观察到荧光素渗漏和管腔颗粒,则认为粘膜改变。采用Fleiss’s和Cohen’s kappa (κ)对一致性进行量化。参考视频(即100%一致的视频)用于评估基于最佳接收者工作特性曲线截止点做出判断所需视频的最优特性。结果:在119个单独的记录中,有87个可用于分析(总计86,408帧)。个体内一致性为80% ~ 100%,个体间一致性为85% (κ = 0.68)。与内镜医师的符合率为54% ~ 95% (κ = 0.15 ~ 0.89)。区分改变和未改变的最佳截止点是观察6个粘膜斑点中≥2个的改变(100%的敏感性和特异性)。结论:我们的研究显示,对于pCLE对急性食物引发的十二指肠上皮屏障破坏的判断,观察者内部和观察者之间都有相当完善的一致性,证实了该实时读数的可靠性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Acute Food-Induced Reactions During Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: An International Multicenter Validation Study.

Background and study aims: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of the duodenal mucosa and has shown acute food-triggered disruption of the duodenal epithelial barrier of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The interpretation of the recordings is subjective, with unknown agreement rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the intra- and interobserver variability of this technique.

Patients and methods: An international multicenter study was performed, including pCLE recordings from three centers. Recordings were randomized and re-evaluated by five blinded experienced assessors. Low-quality recordings were excluded. The mucosa was considered altered if both fluorescein leakage and luminal particles were observed. Agreement was quantified using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa (κ). Reference videos (i.e., videos with 100% agreement) were used to assess the optimal characteristics of videos needed to make a judgment based on the optimal receiver operating characteristic curve cutoff.

Results: Of the 119 individual recordings, 87 could be used for analyses (total of 86,408 frames). Intraindividual agreement rate was 80%-100%, whereas the interindividual agreement rate was 85% (κ = 0.68). The agreement rate with the endoscopist ranged 54%-95% (κ = 0.15-0.89). The optimal cutoff to distinguish altered from unaltered was by observing alterations in ≥ 2 out of 6 mucosal spots (100% sensitivity and specificity).

Conclusion: Our study showed a substantial to perfect intraobserver agreement and a substantial interobserver agreement for the judgment of acute food-triggered disruption of the duodenal epithelial barrier by pCLE, confirming that this real-time readout is reliable and reproducible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信