宠物兔的细菌多样性:对公共卫生、人畜共患病风险和抗菌素耐药性的影响。

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Smaranda Crăciun, Cristiana Ştefania Novac, Nicodim Iosif Fiţ, Cosmina Maria Bouari, Lucia Victoria Bel, George Cosmin Nadăş
{"title":"宠物兔的细菌多样性:对公共卫生、人畜共患病风险和抗菌素耐药性的影响。","authors":"Smaranda Crăciun, Cristiana Ştefania Novac, Nicodim Iosif Fiţ, Cosmina Maria Bouari, Lucia Victoria Bel, George Cosmin Nadăş","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13030653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined epidemiological aspects of rabbit pathologies, identified bacterial strains, and assessed their antimicrobial resistance, emphasizing rabbits as potential reservoirs for zoonotic multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria and the need for continuous monitoring and antimicrobial stewardship. Samples from rabbits were cultivated and then identified using Vitek<sup>®</sup> 2 and MALDI-TOF. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disk diffusion testing. This study analyzed 170 individuals with various pathologies, with males (58.24%) outnumbering females (41.76%). Dental abscesses (35.29%) and respiratory infections (28.24%) were most common. Antibiotic exposure was noted in 47.06% of cases, primarily involving trimethoprim (35.56%). Of the total samples, 91.18% tested positive, revealing 200 isolates from 23 bacterial genera, with <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (31%) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (12%) being most frequently identified as well as species with zoonotic potential, such as <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed high efficacy for florfenicol (75%), ciprofloxacin (74.12%), and amikacin (68.65%), while significant resistance was found for kanamycin, neomycin, and trimethoprim. Nearly 49% of strains were MDR, with Gram-positive cocci, Enterobacteriaceae, and non-Enterobacteriaceae showing varying resistance, across 18 MDR genera. In conclusion, pet rabbits are potential reservoirs of zoonotic and MDR bacterial species, posing a risk for their owners.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial Diversity in Pet Rabbits: Implications for Public Health, Zoonotic Risks, and Antimicrobial Resistance.\",\"authors\":\"Smaranda Crăciun, Cristiana Ştefania Novac, Nicodim Iosif Fiţ, Cosmina Maria Bouari, Lucia Victoria Bel, George Cosmin Nadăş\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/microorganisms13030653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined epidemiological aspects of rabbit pathologies, identified bacterial strains, and assessed their antimicrobial resistance, emphasizing rabbits as potential reservoirs for zoonotic multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria and the need for continuous monitoring and antimicrobial stewardship. Samples from rabbits were cultivated and then identified using Vitek<sup>®</sup> 2 and MALDI-TOF. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disk diffusion testing. This study analyzed 170 individuals with various pathologies, with males (58.24%) outnumbering females (41.76%). Dental abscesses (35.29%) and respiratory infections (28.24%) were most common. Antibiotic exposure was noted in 47.06% of cases, primarily involving trimethoprim (35.56%). Of the total samples, 91.18% tested positive, revealing 200 isolates from 23 bacterial genera, with <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. (31%) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (12%) being most frequently identified as well as species with zoonotic potential, such as <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Proteus mirabilis</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed high efficacy for florfenicol (75%), ciprofloxacin (74.12%), and amikacin (68.65%), while significant resistance was found for kanamycin, neomycin, and trimethoprim. Nearly 49% of strains were MDR, with Gram-positive cocci, Enterobacteriaceae, and non-Enterobacteriaceae showing varying resistance, across 18 MDR genera. In conclusion, pet rabbits are potential reservoirs of zoonotic and MDR bacterial species, posing a risk for their owners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microorganisms\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945246/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microorganisms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030653\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了家兔病理学的流行病学方面,鉴定了细菌菌株,并评估了它们的抗微生物药物耐药性,强调家兔是人畜共患多重耐药(MDR)细菌的潜在宿主,需要持续监测和抗微生物药物管理。兔标本培养后用Vitek®2和MALDI-TOF进行鉴定。采用纸片扩散试验评价药敏。本研究共分析了170例不同病理的个体,男性占58.24%,女性占41.76%。口腔脓肿(35.29%)和呼吸道感染(28.24%)最为常见。47.06%的病例暴露于抗生素,主要涉及甲氧苄氨嘧啶(35.56%)。在全部样本中,91.18%的检测呈阳性,从23个细菌属中分离出200株,其中最常见的是葡萄球菌(31%)和大肠杆菌(12%),以及具有人畜共患潜力的物种,如铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、神奇变形杆菌和屎肠球菌。药敏试验结果显示,氟苯尼考、环丙沙星和阿米卡星的药敏率分别为75%、74.12%和68.65%,卡那霉素、新霉素和甲氧苄啶的药敏率均较高。近49%的菌株为耐多药,革兰氏阳性球菌、肠杆菌科和非肠杆菌科在18个耐多药属中表现出不同的耐药性。总之,宠物兔是人畜共患病和耐多药耐药细菌的潜在宿主,对其主人构成风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacterial Diversity in Pet Rabbits: Implications for Public Health, Zoonotic Risks, and Antimicrobial Resistance.

This study examined epidemiological aspects of rabbit pathologies, identified bacterial strains, and assessed their antimicrobial resistance, emphasizing rabbits as potential reservoirs for zoonotic multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria and the need for continuous monitoring and antimicrobial stewardship. Samples from rabbits were cultivated and then identified using Vitek® 2 and MALDI-TOF. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disk diffusion testing. This study analyzed 170 individuals with various pathologies, with males (58.24%) outnumbering females (41.76%). Dental abscesses (35.29%) and respiratory infections (28.24%) were most common. Antibiotic exposure was noted in 47.06% of cases, primarily involving trimethoprim (35.56%). Of the total samples, 91.18% tested positive, revealing 200 isolates from 23 bacterial genera, with Staphylococcus spp. (31%) and Escherichia coli (12%) being most frequently identified as well as species with zoonotic potential, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed high efficacy for florfenicol (75%), ciprofloxacin (74.12%), and amikacin (68.65%), while significant resistance was found for kanamycin, neomycin, and trimethoprim. Nearly 49% of strains were MDR, with Gram-positive cocci, Enterobacteriaceae, and non-Enterobacteriaceae showing varying resistance, across 18 MDR genera. In conclusion, pet rabbits are potential reservoirs of zoonotic and MDR bacterial species, posing a risk for their owners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信