预防性双组胺阻断对非格昔汀引起的女性癌症患者骨痛的影响:单一机构分析。

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Noor Ul Ain Azam, Fauzia Abdus Samad, Abdus Samad Syed, Asif Riaz Khan, Aalia Mushtaq, Faraz Saif
{"title":"预防性双组胺阻断对非格昔汀引起的女性癌症患者骨痛的影响:单一机构分析。","authors":"Noor Ul Ain Azam, Fauzia Abdus Samad, Abdus Samad Syed, Asif Riaz Khan, Aalia Mushtaq, Faraz Saif","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2482884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone pain is the commonest side-effect faced by cancer patients receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy for the primary or secondary prevention of febrile neutropenia. We conducted a prospective quasi-experimental study at our setup to see the efficacy of dual histamine blockade (combined H1 and H2 receptor blockers) for preventing G-CSF-induced bone pain. Adult female patients with solid tumors who had received filgrastim for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia and met our inclusion criteria, were enrolled (<i>n</i> = 119). This population was analyzed for the development of significant bone pain 24 h after the administration of Filgrastim. Significant bone pain in our study was defined as emergence of new onset pain measuring ≥4 on 11-point Numerical rating scale (NRS) or at least ≥ 2-point increase in score when compared to the baseline pain (if any). Those patients who experienced significant bone pain (<i>n</i> = 47) were given Loratadine 10 mg and Famotidine 20 mg orally half an hour before the next filgrastim administration. Pain assessment was done 24 h after Filgrastim administration, using NRS and data was analyzed. The mean NRS score in our patients after administration of filgrastim was 6.87 ± 1.055. Most of these patients (<i>n</i> = 34 i.e 72%) experienced relief in bone pain after dual histamine blockade use. The mean NRS score following the use of dual antihistamines was 4.36 ± 1.870. The NRS score improved by a mean of 2.51 after using dual histamine blockade, which was statistically significant (p-value= 0.0005). We propose that dualhistamine blockade may prove to be an effective option for prophylaxis of G-CSF-induced-bone-pain. Randomized control trials on larger and more diverse patient populations are required to reinforce the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Prophylactic Dual Histamine Blockade on Filgrastim-Induced Bone Pain in Female Cancer Patients: Single Institutional Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Noor Ul Ain Azam, Fauzia Abdus Samad, Abdus Samad Syed, Asif Riaz Khan, Aalia Mushtaq, Faraz Saif\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15360288.2025.2482884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bone pain is the commonest side-effect faced by cancer patients receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy for the primary or secondary prevention of febrile neutropenia. We conducted a prospective quasi-experimental study at our setup to see the efficacy of dual histamine blockade (combined H1 and H2 receptor blockers) for preventing G-CSF-induced bone pain. Adult female patients with solid tumors who had received filgrastim for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia and met our inclusion criteria, were enrolled (<i>n</i> = 119). This population was analyzed for the development of significant bone pain 24 h after the administration of Filgrastim. Significant bone pain in our study was defined as emergence of new onset pain measuring ≥4 on 11-point Numerical rating scale (NRS) or at least ≥ 2-point increase in score when compared to the baseline pain (if any). Those patients who experienced significant bone pain (<i>n</i> = 47) were given Loratadine 10 mg and Famotidine 20 mg orally half an hour before the next filgrastim administration. Pain assessment was done 24 h after Filgrastim administration, using NRS and data was analyzed. The mean NRS score in our patients after administration of filgrastim was 6.87 ± 1.055. Most of these patients (<i>n</i> = 34 i.e 72%) experienced relief in bone pain after dual histamine blockade use. The mean NRS score following the use of dual antihistamines was 4.36 ± 1.870. The NRS score improved by a mean of 2.51 after using dual histamine blockade, which was statistically significant (p-value= 0.0005). We propose that dualhistamine blockade may prove to be an effective option for prophylaxis of G-CSF-induced-bone-pain. Randomized control trials on larger and more diverse patient populations are required to reinforce the findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2482884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2482884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨痛是接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)治疗以初级或二级预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症的癌症患者面临的最常见的副作用。我们进行了一项前瞻性准实验研究,以观察双组胺阻断剂(联合H1和H2受体阻断剂)预防g - csf诱导的骨痛的疗效。接受非格昔汀初级预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症的成年女性实体瘤患者符合我们的纳入标准,纳入研究(n = 119)。分析该人群在给予非格拉西汀24小时后出现明显骨痛的情况。在我们的研究中,明显的骨痛被定义为出现新发疼痛,在11分数值评定量表(NRS)中测量≥4分,或者与基线疼痛(如果有)相比,评分至少增加≥2分。有明显骨痛的患者(n = 47)在下次给药非格拉西汀前半小时口服氯雷他定10 mg和法莫替丁20 mg。非格拉西汀给药后24 h进行疼痛评估,采用NRS法并对数据进行分析。非格司汀治疗后NRS评分平均值为6.87±1.055。大多数患者(n = 34,即72%)在使用双组胺阻断剂后骨痛得到缓解。使用双抗组胺药后的平均NRS评分为4.36±1.870。双组胺阻断治疗后NRS评分平均提高2.51分,差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.0005)。我们建议双组胺阻断可能被证明是预防g - csf诱导的骨痛的有效选择。需要在更大和更多样化的患者群体中进行随机对照试验来加强研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Prophylactic Dual Histamine Blockade on Filgrastim-Induced Bone Pain in Female Cancer Patients: Single Institutional Analysis.

Bone pain is the commonest side-effect faced by cancer patients receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy for the primary or secondary prevention of febrile neutropenia. We conducted a prospective quasi-experimental study at our setup to see the efficacy of dual histamine blockade (combined H1 and H2 receptor blockers) for preventing G-CSF-induced bone pain. Adult female patients with solid tumors who had received filgrastim for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia and met our inclusion criteria, were enrolled (n = 119). This population was analyzed for the development of significant bone pain 24 h after the administration of Filgrastim. Significant bone pain in our study was defined as emergence of new onset pain measuring ≥4 on 11-point Numerical rating scale (NRS) or at least ≥ 2-point increase in score when compared to the baseline pain (if any). Those patients who experienced significant bone pain (n = 47) were given Loratadine 10 mg and Famotidine 20 mg orally half an hour before the next filgrastim administration. Pain assessment was done 24 h after Filgrastim administration, using NRS and data was analyzed. The mean NRS score in our patients after administration of filgrastim was 6.87 ± 1.055. Most of these patients (n = 34 i.e 72%) experienced relief in bone pain after dual histamine blockade use. The mean NRS score following the use of dual antihistamines was 4.36 ± 1.870. The NRS score improved by a mean of 2.51 after using dual histamine blockade, which was statistically significant (p-value= 0.0005). We propose that dualhistamine blockade may prove to be an effective option for prophylaxis of G-CSF-induced-bone-pain. Randomized control trials on larger and more diverse patient populations are required to reinforce the findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信