{"title":"股骨近端万能钉系统(PFUN):一种治疗复杂股骨近端骨折的新型髓内钉及其与股骨近端抗旋转钉(PFNA)的生物力学比较。","authors":"Fang Zhou, Jixing Fan, Yang Lv","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05724-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The loss of medial and lateral wall support were the main risk factors of implant failure for proximal femoral fractures. A novel intramedullary nail, called proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN), was proposed by our team to reconstruct the medial wall and lateral wall integrity and the biomechanical performance was evaluated in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The synthetic femora were assigned to three groups randomly according to three different proximal femoral fracture types. For each group, the PFUN or PFNA were implanted separately and divided into PFUN subgroup and PFNA subgroup. Biomechanical tests were separately conducted in the axial compression test, torsional test, and fatigue test in sequence. The finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted by ANSYS 14.5 and we analyzed the von Mises stress distribution and the model displacement of two implant models in three different fracture types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For proximal femoral fractures with intact medial wall and lateral wall, our biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a similar biomechanical property with the PFNA. Furthermore, the biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a larger axial stiffness, higher torsional strength, and a similar failure load when compared with the PFNA for proximal femoral fracture with medial wall fracture. For proximal femoral fractures with broken medial wall and lateral wall, a larger axial stiffness, higher average torque and higher failure load were found in the PFUN when compared with the PFNA. The FEA results showed that the PFUN model had a higher stress concentration compared with the PFNA model, and the total displacement of the PFNA model increased by 11.63% when compared with the PFUN model in the proximal femoral fracture with broken medial wall and lateral wall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that PFUN had better biomechanical performance than PFNA, especially for complex proximal femoral fractures with medial wall fracture and lateral wall fracture, indicating that the PFUN had great potential as a new fixation strategy in future clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN): a novel intramedullary nail for treating complex proximal femoral fractures and its biomechanical comparison with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA).\",\"authors\":\"Fang Zhou, Jixing Fan, Yang Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-05724-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The loss of medial and lateral wall support were the main risk factors of implant failure for proximal femoral fractures. A novel intramedullary nail, called proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN), was proposed by our team to reconstruct the medial wall and lateral wall integrity and the biomechanical performance was evaluated in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The synthetic femora were assigned to three groups randomly according to three different proximal femoral fracture types. For each group, the PFUN or PFNA were implanted separately and divided into PFUN subgroup and PFNA subgroup. Biomechanical tests were separately conducted in the axial compression test, torsional test, and fatigue test in sequence. The finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted by ANSYS 14.5 and we analyzed the von Mises stress distribution and the model displacement of two implant models in three different fracture types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For proximal femoral fractures with intact medial wall and lateral wall, our biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a similar biomechanical property with the PFNA. Furthermore, the biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a larger axial stiffness, higher torsional strength, and a similar failure load when compared with the PFNA for proximal femoral fracture with medial wall fracture. For proximal femoral fractures with broken medial wall and lateral wall, a larger axial stiffness, higher average torque and higher failure load were found in the PFUN when compared with the PFNA. The FEA results showed that the PFUN model had a higher stress concentration compared with the PFNA model, and the total displacement of the PFNA model increased by 11.63% when compared with the PFUN model in the proximal femoral fracture with broken medial wall and lateral wall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that PFUN had better biomechanical performance than PFNA, especially for complex proximal femoral fractures with medial wall fracture and lateral wall fracture, indicating that the PFUN had great potential as a new fixation strategy in future clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05724-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05724-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN): a novel intramedullary nail for treating complex proximal femoral fractures and its biomechanical comparison with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA).
Aims: The loss of medial and lateral wall support were the main risk factors of implant failure for proximal femoral fractures. A novel intramedullary nail, called proximal femoral universal nail system (PFUN), was proposed by our team to reconstruct the medial wall and lateral wall integrity and the biomechanical performance was evaluated in this study.
Methods: The synthetic femora were assigned to three groups randomly according to three different proximal femoral fracture types. For each group, the PFUN or PFNA were implanted separately and divided into PFUN subgroup and PFNA subgroup. Biomechanical tests were separately conducted in the axial compression test, torsional test, and fatigue test in sequence. The finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted by ANSYS 14.5 and we analyzed the von Mises stress distribution and the model displacement of two implant models in three different fracture types.
Results: For proximal femoral fractures with intact medial wall and lateral wall, our biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a similar biomechanical property with the PFNA. Furthermore, the biomechanical results showed that the PFUN had a larger axial stiffness, higher torsional strength, and a similar failure load when compared with the PFNA for proximal femoral fracture with medial wall fracture. For proximal femoral fractures with broken medial wall and lateral wall, a larger axial stiffness, higher average torque and higher failure load were found in the PFUN when compared with the PFNA. The FEA results showed that the PFUN model had a higher stress concentration compared with the PFNA model, and the total displacement of the PFNA model increased by 11.63% when compared with the PFUN model in the proximal femoral fracture with broken medial wall and lateral wall.
Conclusion: Our results showed that PFUN had better biomechanical performance than PFNA, especially for complex proximal femoral fractures with medial wall fracture and lateral wall fracture, indicating that the PFUN had great potential as a new fixation strategy in future clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.