Elham Nasiri, Ashraf Karbalaei Nouri, Seyed Ali Hosseini, Ghazaleh Mandani
{"title":"以职业和活动为基础的健康管理干预措施对成年严重精神障碍患者的系统评价。","authors":"Elham Nasiri, Ashraf Karbalaei Nouri, Seyed Ali Hosseini, Ghazaleh Mandani","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1036_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the negative effects of severe mental disorders (SMDs) on the patient's social and occupational functioning and general health, besides accumulating evidence on the effectiveness of occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for these patients and the novelty of research on this topic, it is important to review, evaluate, and categorize relevant studies. The present study aimed to systematically review occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for adult patients with SMDs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present study is a systematic review. We conducted a literature search in Medline, OTseeker, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, ISI Web of Science, MagIran, ISC, and SID databases from 2000 until October 2021. The study population consisted of patients clinically diagnosed with SMDs (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression). After the literature search, we investigated the screening, quality, and inclusion and exclusion criteria of the articles. In the primary search, we extracted 238 relevant articles, and after appraising their titles and abstracts, we identified 55 relevant articles. After reviewing the full text of the articles and removing duplicates, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria of this study, while we excluded two articles from the quality assessment. Finally, we reviewed 15 studies. The outcomes included all positive and negative treatment effects and outcomes of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the results, there were multiple occupation- and activity-based interventions for patients with SMDs, which could directly or indirectly improve their general functioning and health management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reviewed studies had numerous blind spots and limitations, such as common shortcomings of randomized clinical trials, lack of long follow-ups, and ambiguity or dispersion of intervention protocols. Besides addressing these limitations, we also discussed research proposals in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for adult patients with severe mental disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Elham Nasiri, Ashraf Karbalaei Nouri, Seyed Ali Hosseini, Ghazaleh Mandani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1036_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the negative effects of severe mental disorders (SMDs) on the patient's social and occupational functioning and general health, besides accumulating evidence on the effectiveness of occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for these patients and the novelty of research on this topic, it is important to review, evaluate, and categorize relevant studies. The present study aimed to systematically review occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for adult patients with SMDs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present study is a systematic review. We conducted a literature search in Medline, OTseeker, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, ISI Web of Science, MagIran, ISC, and SID databases from 2000 until October 2021. The study population consisted of patients clinically diagnosed with SMDs (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression). After the literature search, we investigated the screening, quality, and inclusion and exclusion criteria of the articles. In the primary search, we extracted 238 relevant articles, and after appraising their titles and abstracts, we identified 55 relevant articles. After reviewing the full text of the articles and removing duplicates, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria of this study, while we excluded two articles from the quality assessment. Finally, we reviewed 15 studies. The outcomes included all positive and negative treatment effects and outcomes of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the results, there were multiple occupation- and activity-based interventions for patients with SMDs, which could directly or indirectly improve their general functioning and health management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reviewed studies had numerous blind spots and limitations, such as common shortcomings of randomized clinical trials, lack of long follow-ups, and ambiguity or dispersion of intervention protocols. Besides addressing these limitations, we also discussed research proposals in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1036_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1036_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:考虑到严重精神障碍(SMDs)对患者社会和职业功能以及总体健康的负面影响,除了积累基于职业和活动的健康管理干预措施对这些患者的有效性的证据以及该主题研究的新颖性外,回顾、评估和分类相关研究很重要。本研究旨在系统回顾以职业和活动为基础的健康管理干预措施对成年smd患者的影响。材料与方法:本研究为系统综述。我们从2000年到2021年10月在Medline、OTseeker、Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、PubMed、PsycINFO、ISI Web of Science、MagIran、ISC和SID数据库中进行了文献检索。研究人群包括临床诊断为smd的患者(如精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症)。在文献检索之后,我们调查了文章的筛选、质量、纳入和排除标准。在初步检索中,我们提取了238篇相关文章,在评估了它们的标题和摘要后,我们确定了55篇相关文章。在对文章全文进行复核并去除重复后,有17篇文章符合本研究的纳入标准,但我们在质量评价中排除了2篇文章。最后,我们回顾了15项研究。结果包括所有积极和消极的治疗效果和干预措施的结果。结果:基于职业和活动的多种干预措施可以直接或间接地改善患者的一般功能和健康管理。结论:回顾的研究存在许多盲点和局限性,例如随机临床试验的共同缺点,缺乏长期随访,干预方案的模糊性或分散性。除了解决这些局限性外,我们还讨论了本研究的研究建议。
A systematic review of occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for adult patients with severe mental disorders.
Background: Considering the negative effects of severe mental disorders (SMDs) on the patient's social and occupational functioning and general health, besides accumulating evidence on the effectiveness of occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for these patients and the novelty of research on this topic, it is important to review, evaluate, and categorize relevant studies. The present study aimed to systematically review occupation- and activity-based health management interventions for adult patients with SMDs.
Materials and methods: The present study is a systematic review. We conducted a literature search in Medline, OTseeker, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, ISI Web of Science, MagIran, ISC, and SID databases from 2000 until October 2021. The study population consisted of patients clinically diagnosed with SMDs (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression). After the literature search, we investigated the screening, quality, and inclusion and exclusion criteria of the articles. In the primary search, we extracted 238 relevant articles, and after appraising their titles and abstracts, we identified 55 relevant articles. After reviewing the full text of the articles and removing duplicates, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria of this study, while we excluded two articles from the quality assessment. Finally, we reviewed 15 studies. The outcomes included all positive and negative treatment effects and outcomes of the interventions.
Results: According to the results, there were multiple occupation- and activity-based interventions for patients with SMDs, which could directly or indirectly improve their general functioning and health management.
Conclusion: The reviewed studies had numerous blind spots and limitations, such as common shortcomings of randomized clinical trials, lack of long follow-ups, and ambiguity or dispersion of intervention protocols. Besides addressing these limitations, we also discussed research proposals in this study.