优化算法和计算复杂度对混凝土抗压强度预测的影响

IF 3.1 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Materials Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.3390/ma18061386
Patryk Ziolkowski
{"title":"优化算法和计算复杂度对混凝土抗压强度预测的影响","authors":"Patryk Ziolkowski","doi":"10.3390/ma18061386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proper design of concrete mixtures is a critical task in concrete technology, where optimal strength, eco-friendliness, and production efficiency are increasingly demanded. While traditional analytical methods, such as the Three Equations Method, offer foundational approaches to mix design, they often fall short in handling the complexity of modern concrete technology. Machine learning-based models have demonstrated notable efficacy in predicting concrete compressive strength, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. This study builds on previous research by investigating not only the impact of computational complexity on the predictive performance of machine learning models but also the influence of different optimization algorithms. The study evaluates the effectiveness of three optimization techniques: the Quasi-Newton Method (QNM), the Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM) algorithm, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). A total of forty-five deep neural network models of varying computational complexity were trained and tested using a comprehensive database of concrete mix designs and their corresponding compressive strength test results. The findings reveal a significant interaction between optimization algorithms and model complexity in enhancing prediction accuracy. Models utilizing the QNM algorithm outperformed those using the ADAM and SGD in terms of error reduction (SSE, MSE, RMSE, NSE, and ME) and increased coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). These insights contribute to the development of more accurate and efficient AI-driven methods in concrete mix design, promoting the advancement of concrete technology and the potential for future research in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18281,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Optimization Algorithms and Computational Complexity on Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.\",\"authors\":\"Patryk Ziolkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ma18061386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The proper design of concrete mixtures is a critical task in concrete technology, where optimal strength, eco-friendliness, and production efficiency are increasingly demanded. While traditional analytical methods, such as the Three Equations Method, offer foundational approaches to mix design, they often fall short in handling the complexity of modern concrete technology. Machine learning-based models have demonstrated notable efficacy in predicting concrete compressive strength, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. This study builds on previous research by investigating not only the impact of computational complexity on the predictive performance of machine learning models but also the influence of different optimization algorithms. The study evaluates the effectiveness of three optimization techniques: the Quasi-Newton Method (QNM), the Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM) algorithm, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). A total of forty-five deep neural network models of varying computational complexity were trained and tested using a comprehensive database of concrete mix designs and their corresponding compressive strength test results. The findings reveal a significant interaction between optimization algorithms and model complexity in enhancing prediction accuracy. Models utilizing the QNM algorithm outperformed those using the ADAM and SGD in terms of error reduction (SSE, MSE, RMSE, NSE, and ME) and increased coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). These insights contribute to the development of more accurate and efficient AI-driven methods in concrete mix design, promoting the advancement of concrete technology and the potential for future research in this domain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944114/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061386\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土混合料的合理设计是混凝土技术中的一项关键任务,在混凝土技术中,对最佳强度、生态友好性和生产效率的要求越来越高。虽然传统的分析方法,如三方程法,为配合比设计提供了基本的方法,但它们在处理现代混凝土技术的复杂性时往往不足。基于机器学习的模型在预测混凝土抗压强度方面已经证明了显著的有效性,解决了传统方法的局限性。本研究建立在以往研究的基础上,不仅研究了计算复杂性对机器学习模型预测性能的影响,还研究了不同优化算法的影响。本研究评估了拟牛顿法(QNM)、自适应矩估计(ADAM)算法和随机梯度下降(SGD)三种优化技术的有效性。利用混凝土配合比设计的综合数据库及其相应的抗压强度测试结果,共训练和测试了45个不同计算复杂度的深度神经网络模型。研究结果表明,优化算法与模型复杂度之间存在显著的交互作用,可提高预测精度。使用QNM算法的模型在误差减少(SSE、MSE、RMSE、NSE和ME)和增加的决定系数(R2)方面优于使用ADAM和SGD的模型。这些见解有助于在混凝土配合比设计中开发更准确、更高效的人工智能驱动方法,促进混凝土技术的进步,并为该领域的未来研究提供潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Optimization Algorithms and Computational Complexity on Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Machine Learning Models for Concrete Mix Design.

The proper design of concrete mixtures is a critical task in concrete technology, where optimal strength, eco-friendliness, and production efficiency are increasingly demanded. While traditional analytical methods, such as the Three Equations Method, offer foundational approaches to mix design, they often fall short in handling the complexity of modern concrete technology. Machine learning-based models have demonstrated notable efficacy in predicting concrete compressive strength, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. This study builds on previous research by investigating not only the impact of computational complexity on the predictive performance of machine learning models but also the influence of different optimization algorithms. The study evaluates the effectiveness of three optimization techniques: the Quasi-Newton Method (QNM), the Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM) algorithm, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). A total of forty-five deep neural network models of varying computational complexity were trained and tested using a comprehensive database of concrete mix designs and their corresponding compressive strength test results. The findings reveal a significant interaction between optimization algorithms and model complexity in enhancing prediction accuracy. Models utilizing the QNM algorithm outperformed those using the ADAM and SGD in terms of error reduction (SSE, MSE, RMSE, NSE, and ME) and increased coefficient of determination (R2). These insights contribute to the development of more accurate and efficient AI-driven methods in concrete mix design, promoting the advancement of concrete technology and the potential for future research in this domain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials
Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
7753
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: Materials (ISSN 1996-1944) is an open access journal of related scientific research and technology development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Materials provides a forum for publishing papers which advance the in-depth understanding of the relationship between the structure, the properties or the functions of all kinds of materials. Chemical syntheses, chemical structures and mechanical, chemical, electronic, magnetic and optical properties and various applications will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信