粉质粘土不排水抗剪强度评价中锥贯试验中锥系数的标定。

IF 3.1 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Materials Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.3390/ma18061283
Caihong Wu, Yue Song, Jialin Dai, Lin Li, Xiaoqiang Gu
{"title":"粉质粘土不排水抗剪强度评价中锥贯试验中锥系数的标定。","authors":"Caihong Wu, Yue Song, Jialin Dai, Lin Li, Xiaoqiang Gu","doi":"10.3390/ma18061283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cone penetration test often uses the cone factor to calculate the undrained shear strength of silty clay base on the cone tip resistance data, but the accurate determination of the cone factor is challenging due to its wide range of values. This study conducted a laboratory cone penetration test and vane shear test to investigate and calibrate the cone factor for evaluating the undrained shear strength of silty clay at various depths. The cone factor is first identified based on the laboratory cone penetration test and vane shear test, and it is compared with the cone factor generated from the cavity expansion theory. Cone factor calibration has been performed by integrating laboratory model tests with the cavity expansion method, unlike conventional approaches relying on singular methodologies. The proposed cone factor is validated by the in situ undrained shear strength of Shanghai silty clay based on the in situ cone penetration test data. The results indicate that the cone factor varies significantly, ranging from 3 to 27. The cone factor from laboratory results shows good agreement with that based on the cavity expansion method. The calibrated cone factor predicts reasonable undrained shear strength measured from in situ tests. The refining method enables ±30% accuracy in predicting field-measured undrained shear strength values, establishing region-specific guidelines for East China Sea investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18281,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration of Cone Factor in Cone Penetration Test for Evaluating the Undrained Shear Strength of Silty Clay.\",\"authors\":\"Caihong Wu, Yue Song, Jialin Dai, Lin Li, Xiaoqiang Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ma18061283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cone penetration test often uses the cone factor to calculate the undrained shear strength of silty clay base on the cone tip resistance data, but the accurate determination of the cone factor is challenging due to its wide range of values. This study conducted a laboratory cone penetration test and vane shear test to investigate and calibrate the cone factor for evaluating the undrained shear strength of silty clay at various depths. The cone factor is first identified based on the laboratory cone penetration test and vane shear test, and it is compared with the cone factor generated from the cavity expansion theory. Cone factor calibration has been performed by integrating laboratory model tests with the cavity expansion method, unlike conventional approaches relying on singular methodologies. The proposed cone factor is validated by the in situ undrained shear strength of Shanghai silty clay based on the in situ cone penetration test data. The results indicate that the cone factor varies significantly, ranging from 3 to 27. The cone factor from laboratory results shows good agreement with that based on the cavity expansion method. The calibrated cone factor predicts reasonable undrained shear strength measured from in situ tests. The refining method enables ±30% accuracy in predicting field-measured undrained shear strength values, establishing region-specific guidelines for East China Sea investigations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943505/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圆锥贯入试验通常采用锥尖阻力数据为基础,利用锥系数计算粉质粘土不排水抗剪强度,但由于锥系数取值范围广,难以准确确定。本研究进行了实验室锥贯试验和叶片剪切试验,研究和校准了评价粉质粘土不同深度不排水抗剪强度的锥系数。首先通过室内圆锥体侵彻试验和叶片剪切试验确定了圆锥体因子,并与由空腔膨胀理论得到的圆锥体因子进行了比较。与依赖单一方法的传统方法不同,锥因子校准是通过将实验室模型试验与腔体扩展方法相结合进行的。基于上海粉质粘土原位不排水抗剪强度试验数据,验证了所提出的锥体系数。结果表明,锥因子变化较大,范围在3 ~ 27之间。室内计算的锥因子与基于空腔膨胀法的计算结果吻合较好。校正后的锥因子可预测现场试验测量的合理的不排水抗剪强度。该方法在预测现场测量的不排水剪切强度值方面具有±30%的精度,为东海调查建立了特定区域的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calibration of Cone Factor in Cone Penetration Test for Evaluating the Undrained Shear Strength of Silty Clay.

Cone penetration test often uses the cone factor to calculate the undrained shear strength of silty clay base on the cone tip resistance data, but the accurate determination of the cone factor is challenging due to its wide range of values. This study conducted a laboratory cone penetration test and vane shear test to investigate and calibrate the cone factor for evaluating the undrained shear strength of silty clay at various depths. The cone factor is first identified based on the laboratory cone penetration test and vane shear test, and it is compared with the cone factor generated from the cavity expansion theory. Cone factor calibration has been performed by integrating laboratory model tests with the cavity expansion method, unlike conventional approaches relying on singular methodologies. The proposed cone factor is validated by the in situ undrained shear strength of Shanghai silty clay based on the in situ cone penetration test data. The results indicate that the cone factor varies significantly, ranging from 3 to 27. The cone factor from laboratory results shows good agreement with that based on the cavity expansion method. The calibrated cone factor predicts reasonable undrained shear strength measured from in situ tests. The refining method enables ±30% accuracy in predicting field-measured undrained shear strength values, establishing region-specific guidelines for East China Sea investigations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials
Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
7753
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: Materials (ISSN 1996-1944) is an open access journal of related scientific research and technology development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Materials provides a forum for publishing papers which advance the in-depth understanding of the relationship between the structure, the properties or the functions of all kinds of materials. Chemical syntheses, chemical structures and mechanical, chemical, electronic, magnetic and optical properties and various applications will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信