肝细胞癌的全身治疗加HAIC与全身治疗:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Donghai Lu, Han Li, Pengfei Sun, Jincheng Tian, Kefan Jiao, Qihang Cao, Yuxuan Wang, Jisen Jia, Qiao He, Shengxuan Peng, Daolin Zhang, Zhaoru Dong, Dongxu Wang, Tao Li
{"title":"肝细胞癌的全身治疗加HAIC与全身治疗:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Donghai Lu, Han Li, Pengfei Sun, Jincheng Tian, Kefan Jiao, Qihang Cao, Yuxuan Wang, Jisen Jia, Qiao He, Shengxuan Peng, Daolin Zhang, Zhaoru Dong, Dongxu Wang, Tao Li","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) exhibits synergistic anticancer effects with systemic therapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The approach combining systemic therapy and HAIC is likely to establish a new survival benchmark for advanced HCC. However, related evidence is still lacking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 to July 2024. The extracted data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression, subgroup analysis, prognostic factor analysis, correlation analysis, as well as trial sequential analysis were further conducted.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Seventeen trials involving 3070 participants were included. Patients receiving HAIC combined systemic therapy displayed superior overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.58), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.63), objective response rate (ORR) (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.77-2.72) and disease control rate (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29) over systemic therapy. Combining HAIC resulted in higher incidences of grade ≥3 manageable adverse events. Subgroup analyses showed that HAIC could bring significant survival improvement for almost all specific populations; however, patients without portal vein tumor thrombosis might not benefit from it (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03). Prognostic factor analyses found extra HAIC was a protective factor for both OS (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.51) and PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.53). Correlation analyses demonstrated a robust association between ORR and OS when applying systemic therapy with HAIC (P-value = 0.031). In addition, trial sequential analyses visually showed the present data were compelling to draw reliable conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With manageable toxicity, integrating HAIC with systemic therapy could bring favorable survival benefits for HCC patients. Further evidence is necessary to standardize the integration of HAIC with first-line systemic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic therapy plus HAIC versus systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Donghai Lu, Han Li, Pengfei Sun, Jincheng Tian, Kefan Jiao, Qihang Cao, Yuxuan Wang, Jisen Jia, Qiao He, Shengxuan Peng, Daolin Zhang, Zhaoru Dong, Dongxu Wang, Tao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) exhibits synergistic anticancer effects with systemic therapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The approach combining systemic therapy and HAIC is likely to establish a new survival benchmark for advanced HCC. However, related evidence is still lacking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 to July 2024. The extracted data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression, subgroup analysis, prognostic factor analysis, correlation analysis, as well as trial sequential analysis were further conducted.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Seventeen trials involving 3070 participants were included. Patients receiving HAIC combined systemic therapy displayed superior overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.58), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.63), objective response rate (ORR) (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.77-2.72) and disease control rate (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29) over systemic therapy. Combining HAIC resulted in higher incidences of grade ≥3 manageable adverse events. Subgroup analyses showed that HAIC could bring significant survival improvement for almost all specific populations; however, patients without portal vein tumor thrombosis might not benefit from it (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03). Prognostic factor analyses found extra HAIC was a protective factor for both OS (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.51) and PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.53). Correlation analyses demonstrated a robust association between ORR and OS when applying systemic therapy with HAIC (P-value = 0.031). In addition, trial sequential analyses visually showed the present data were compelling to draw reliable conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With manageable toxicity, integrating HAIC with systemic therapy could bring favorable survival benefits for HCC patients. Further evidence is necessary to standardize the integration of HAIC with first-line systemic therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)在治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)中显示出与全身治疗协同的抗癌作用。结合全身治疗和HAIC的方法可能为晚期HCC建立新的生存基准。然而,相关证据仍然缺乏。方法:检索1990年1月至2024年7月PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science。提取的数据使用固定效应或随机效应模型进行汇总,并用相应的95%置信区间(ci)表示为风险比(hr)或风险比(rr)。进一步进行meta回归、亚组分析、预后因素分析、相关分析及试验序贯分析。结果:纳入17项试验,共3070名受试者。接受HAIC联合全身治疗的患者显示出更高的总生存期(OS) (HR, 0.52;95% CI, 0.48-0.58),无进展生存期(PFS) (HR, 0.54;95% CI, 0.46-0.63),客观有效率(ORR) (RR, 2.20;95% CI, 1.77-2.72)和疾病控制率(RR, 1.21;95% CI, 1.14-1.29)优于全身治疗。合并HAIC导致≥3级可控制不良事件的发生率更高。亚组分析显示,HAIC可以显著改善几乎所有特定人群的生存;然而,没有门静脉肿瘤血栓形成的患者可能不会从中受益(HR, 0.74;95% ci, 0.53-1.03)。预后因素分析发现,额外的HAIC是两种OS的保护因素(HR, 0.42;95% CI, 0.34-0.51)和PFS (HR, 0.44;95% ci, 0.36-0.53)。相关分析表明,当采用HAIC进行全身治疗时,ORR和OS之间存在显著相关性(p值= 0.031)。此外,试验序列分析直观地表明,目前的数据是令人信服的,可以得出可靠的结论。结论:在毒性可控的情况下,HAIC联合全身治疗可为HCC患者带来良好的生存效益。需要进一步的证据来规范HAIC与一线全身治疗的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic therapy plus HAIC versus systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) exhibits synergistic anticancer effects with systemic therapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The approach combining systemic therapy and HAIC is likely to establish a new survival benchmark for advanced HCC. However, related evidence is still lacking.

Method: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 to July 2024. The extracted data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression, subgroup analysis, prognostic factor analysis, correlation analysis, as well as trial sequential analysis were further conducted.

Result: Seventeen trials involving 3070 participants were included. Patients receiving HAIC combined systemic therapy displayed superior overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.58), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.63), objective response rate (ORR) (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.77-2.72) and disease control rate (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.29) over systemic therapy. Combining HAIC resulted in higher incidences of grade ≥3 manageable adverse events. Subgroup analyses showed that HAIC could bring significant survival improvement for almost all specific populations; however, patients without portal vein tumor thrombosis might not benefit from it (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03). Prognostic factor analyses found extra HAIC was a protective factor for both OS (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.51) and PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.53). Correlation analyses demonstrated a robust association between ORR and OS when applying systemic therapy with HAIC (P-value = 0.031). In addition, trial sequential analyses visually showed the present data were compelling to draw reliable conclusions.

Conclusion: With manageable toxicity, integrating HAIC with systemic therapy could bring favorable survival benefits for HCC patients. Further evidence is necessary to standardize the integration of HAIC with first-line systemic therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信