Xinghe Wang, Meiyan Zhou, Qian Liu, Fangming Shen, Zhe Zhang, Long Wang, Yu Qi, Jia Sun, Liwei Wang
{"title":"胸肋间筋膜阻滞对老年非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术患者术后疲劳的影响:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Xinghe Wang, Meiyan Zhou, Qian Liu, Fangming Shen, Zhe Zhang, Long Wang, Yu Qi, Jia Sun, Liwei Wang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) is a common yet often under-recognized consequence of surgical interventions, particularly in cardiac surgery. POFS is associated with prolonged recovery times, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Current strategies for preventing POFS have demonstrated limited success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) on the incidence of POFS in elderly patients undergoing off-pumpcoronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 110 elderly patients scheduled for off-pump CABG surgery were randomly assigned to either the PIFB group (n = 55; 0.4% ropivacaine) or the control group (n = 55; normal saline). The primary outcome was the incidence of POFS, which was assessed using the ICFS-10 scale. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, extubation time, duration of ICU and hospital stay, and Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of POFS was significantly lower in the PIFB group compared to the control group on postoperative days 1 (69.0% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.004), 3 (63.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.030), and 5 (52.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.048), with no significant differences observed by day 7 and 8 weeks. Pain scores were also markedly lower in the PIFB group at three time points: immediately after extubation, 12 hours post-surgery, and 24 hours post-surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Furthermore, opioid consumption was reduced by an average of 11.1 mg (P < 0.001). Patients in the PIFB group experienced significantly shorter extubation times (5.5 ± 1.8 hours vs. 8.6 ± 2.1 hours, P < 0.001), ICU stays (31.8 ± 7.3 hours vs. 39.4 ± 7.5 hours, P < 0.001), and hospital stays (8.2 ± 1.1 days vs. 8.8 ± 1.2 days, P = 0.007). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the PIFB group on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.037, respectively). Notably, no PIFB-related adverse events were reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIFB significantly alleviated early POFS, enhanced pain management, reduced opioid consumption, and accelerated recovery, thereby improving the overall quality of recovery in elderly patients undergoing off-pump CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block on postoperative fatigue in elderly patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xinghe Wang, Meiyan Zhou, Qian Liu, Fangming Shen, Zhe Zhang, Long Wang, Yu Qi, Jia Sun, Liwei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) is a common yet often under-recognized consequence of surgical interventions, particularly in cardiac surgery. POFS is associated with prolonged recovery times, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Current strategies for preventing POFS have demonstrated limited success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) on the incidence of POFS in elderly patients undergoing off-pumpcoronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 110 elderly patients scheduled for off-pump CABG surgery were randomly assigned to either the PIFB group (n = 55; 0.4% ropivacaine) or the control group (n = 55; normal saline). The primary outcome was the incidence of POFS, which was assessed using the ICFS-10 scale. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, extubation time, duration of ICU and hospital stay, and Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of POFS was significantly lower in the PIFB group compared to the control group on postoperative days 1 (69.0% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.004), 3 (63.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.030), and 5 (52.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.048), with no significant differences observed by day 7 and 8 weeks. Pain scores were also markedly lower in the PIFB group at three time points: immediately after extubation, 12 hours post-surgery, and 24 hours post-surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Furthermore, opioid consumption was reduced by an average of 11.1 mg (P < 0.001). Patients in the PIFB group experienced significantly shorter extubation times (5.5 ± 1.8 hours vs. 8.6 ± 2.1 hours, P < 0.001), ICU stays (31.8 ± 7.3 hours vs. 39.4 ± 7.5 hours, P < 0.001), and hospital stays (8.2 ± 1.1 days vs. 8.8 ± 1.2 days, P = 0.007). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the PIFB group on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.037, respectively). Notably, no PIFB-related adverse events were reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIFB significantly alleviated early POFS, enhanced pain management, reduced opioid consumption, and accelerated recovery, thereby improving the overall quality of recovery in elderly patients undergoing off-pump CABG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002353\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:术后疲劳综合征(POFS)是外科手术干预的常见后果,但往往未得到充分认识,特别是在心脏手术中。POFS与恢复时间延长、住院时间延长和医疗费用增加有关。目前预防POFS的战略取得了有限的成功。本研究旨在评估胸肋间筋膜阻滞(PIFB)对老年非泵送冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者pfs发生率的影响。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,110例计划进行非体外循环CABG手术的老年患者被随机分配到PIFB组(n = 55;0.4%罗哌卡因)或对照组(n = 55;生理盐水)。主要终点是POFS的发生率,使用ICFS-10量表进行评估。次要结局包括术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗、拔管时间、ICU和住院时间以及恢复质量(QoR-15)评分。结果:PIFB组术后第1天(69.0% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.004)、第3天(63.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.030)、第5天(52.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.048)的POFS发生率均显著低于对照组,第7、8周无显著差异。PIFB组在拔管后即刻、术后12小时、术后24小时三个时间点的疼痛评分也明显降低(P < 0.001、P < 0.001、P = 0.002)。此外,阿片类药物的消耗平均减少了11.1毫克(P < 0.001)。PIFB组拔管时间(5.5±1.8小时比8.6±2.1小时,P < 0.001)、ICU住院时间(31.8±7.3小时比39.4±7.5小时,P < 0.001)、住院时间(8.2±1.1天比8.8±1.2天,P = 0.007)均显著缩短。PIFB组QoR-15评分在术后第1、3、5天显著高于PIFB组(P < 0.001, P = 0.003, P = 0.037)。值得注意的是,两组均未报告与pifb相关的不良事件。结论:PIFB可显著缓解早期POFS,增强疼痛管理,减少阿片类药物消耗,加速恢复,从而提高老年非体外循环CABG患者的整体恢复质量。
Impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block on postoperative fatigue in elderly patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial.
Background: Postoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) is a common yet often under-recognized consequence of surgical interventions, particularly in cardiac surgery. POFS is associated with prolonged recovery times, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Current strategies for preventing POFS have demonstrated limited success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) on the incidence of POFS in elderly patients undergoing off-pumpcoronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 110 elderly patients scheduled for off-pump CABG surgery were randomly assigned to either the PIFB group (n = 55; 0.4% ropivacaine) or the control group (n = 55; normal saline). The primary outcome was the incidence of POFS, which was assessed using the ICFS-10 scale. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, extubation time, duration of ICU and hospital stay, and Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores.
Results: The incidence of POFS was significantly lower in the PIFB group compared to the control group on postoperative days 1 (69.0% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.004), 3 (63.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.030), and 5 (52.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.048), with no significant differences observed by day 7 and 8 weeks. Pain scores were also markedly lower in the PIFB group at three time points: immediately after extubation, 12 hours post-surgery, and 24 hours post-surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Furthermore, opioid consumption was reduced by an average of 11.1 mg (P < 0.001). Patients in the PIFB group experienced significantly shorter extubation times (5.5 ± 1.8 hours vs. 8.6 ± 2.1 hours, P < 0.001), ICU stays (31.8 ± 7.3 hours vs. 39.4 ± 7.5 hours, P < 0.001), and hospital stays (8.2 ± 1.1 days vs. 8.8 ± 1.2 days, P = 0.007). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the PIFB group on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.037, respectively). Notably, no PIFB-related adverse events were reported in either group.
Conclusions: PIFB significantly alleviated early POFS, enhanced pain management, reduced opioid consumption, and accelerated recovery, thereby improving the overall quality of recovery in elderly patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.