视觉-触觉联合定位的二维精度和精度表征。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnins.2025.1528601
Madeline Fischer, Umberto Saetti, Martine Godfroy-Cooper, Douglas Fischer
{"title":"视觉-触觉联合定位的二维精度和精度表征。","authors":"Madeline Fischer, Umberto Saetti, Martine Godfroy-Cooper, Douglas Fischer","doi":"10.3389/fnins.2025.1528601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes a combined visual and haptic localization experiment that addresses the area of multimodal cueing. The aim of the present investigation was to characterize two-dimensional (2D) localization precision and accuracy of visual, haptic, and combined visual-tactile targets in the peri-personal space, the space around the body in which sensory information is perceived as ecologically relevant. Participants were presented with visual, haptic, or bimodal cues using the body-centered reference frame and were instructed to indicate the corresponding perceived target location in space using a mouse pointer in an open-loop feedback condition. Outcomes of the unimodal (visual and haptic) and bimodal (combined visual-haptic) localization performance were used to assess the nature of the multisensory combination, using a Bayesian integration model. Results of the study revealed that the visual and haptic perceptive fields are characterized differently in terms of localization performance, providing important considerations for the transformation of each sensory modality when combining cues into a unified percept. The results reaffirmed many well known radial characteristics of vision with respect to localization, and identified a nonlinear pattern of haptic localization performance that was largely influenced by the midline of the center of the torso and each side of the cutaneous region. Overall, the lack of improvement in precision for bimodal cueing relative to the best unimodal cueing modality, vision, is in favor of sensory combination rather than optimal integration predicted by the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) model. Conversely, the hypothesis that accuracy in localizing the bimodal visual-haptic targets would represent a compromise between visual and haptic performance in favor of the most precise modality was rejected. Instead, the bimodal accuracy was found to be equivalent to or to exceed that of the best unimodal condition, vision. The results provide some insight into the structure of the underlying sensorimotor processes employed by the brain and confirm the usefulness of capitalizing on naturally occurring differences between vision and haptic to better understand their interaction and their contribution to multimodal perception These results will help inform the development of future human-machine interfaces implementing haptic feedback mechanisms In the context of pilot performance, haptic localization can have several benefits including enhanced situational awareness, improved spatial orientation, reduced workload, thereby contributing to safer operations. These benefits can be applied to future systems for aircraft handling by helping overcome visual illusions and discrepancies between visual and vestibular sensory channels, especially in degraded visual environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12639,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1528601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of 2D precision and accuracy for combined visual-haptic localization.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Fischer, Umberto Saetti, Martine Godfroy-Cooper, Douglas Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnins.2025.1528601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article describes a combined visual and haptic localization experiment that addresses the area of multimodal cueing. The aim of the present investigation was to characterize two-dimensional (2D) localization precision and accuracy of visual, haptic, and combined visual-tactile targets in the peri-personal space, the space around the body in which sensory information is perceived as ecologically relevant. Participants were presented with visual, haptic, or bimodal cues using the body-centered reference frame and were instructed to indicate the corresponding perceived target location in space using a mouse pointer in an open-loop feedback condition. Outcomes of the unimodal (visual and haptic) and bimodal (combined visual-haptic) localization performance were used to assess the nature of the multisensory combination, using a Bayesian integration model. Results of the study revealed that the visual and haptic perceptive fields are characterized differently in terms of localization performance, providing important considerations for the transformation of each sensory modality when combining cues into a unified percept. The results reaffirmed many well known radial characteristics of vision with respect to localization, and identified a nonlinear pattern of haptic localization performance that was largely influenced by the midline of the center of the torso and each side of the cutaneous region. Overall, the lack of improvement in precision for bimodal cueing relative to the best unimodal cueing modality, vision, is in favor of sensory combination rather than optimal integration predicted by the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) model. Conversely, the hypothesis that accuracy in localizing the bimodal visual-haptic targets would represent a compromise between visual and haptic performance in favor of the most precise modality was rejected. Instead, the bimodal accuracy was found to be equivalent to or to exceed that of the best unimodal condition, vision. The results provide some insight into the structure of the underlying sensorimotor processes employed by the brain and confirm the usefulness of capitalizing on naturally occurring differences between vision and haptic to better understand their interaction and their contribution to multimodal perception These results will help inform the development of future human-machine interfaces implementing haptic feedback mechanisms In the context of pilot performance, haptic localization can have several benefits including enhanced situational awareness, improved spatial orientation, reduced workload, thereby contributing to safer operations. These benefits can be applied to future systems for aircraft handling by helping overcome visual illusions and discrepancies between visual and vestibular sensory channels, especially in degraded visual environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1528601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936952/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1528601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1528601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章描述了一个结合视觉和触觉定位的实验,解决了多模态线索的领域。本研究的目的是表征视觉、触觉和视觉-触觉组合目标在个人周围空间的二维定位精度和准确性。个人周围空间是感知感官信息与生态相关的空间。参与者在以身体为中心的参照系中获得视觉、触觉或双峰提示,并被指示在开环反馈条件下使用鼠标指针指示相应的感知目标在空间中的位置。使用贝叶斯整合模型,使用单峰(视觉和触觉)和双峰(视觉和触觉结合)定位表现的结果来评估多感觉组合的性质。研究结果表明,视觉和触觉感知场在定位表现方面具有不同的特征,这为将线索组合成统一感知时每种感觉模态的转换提供了重要的考虑因素。结果重申了许多众所周知的视觉径向定位特征,并确定了触觉定位表现的非线性模式,该模式在很大程度上受躯干中心中线和皮肤区域两侧的影响。总的来说,相对于最好的单峰线索模式(视觉),双峰线索的精度缺乏提高,这有利于感官组合,而不是最大似然估计(MLE)模型预测的最佳整合。相反,关于定位双峰视觉-触觉目标的准确性将代表视觉和触觉性能之间的妥协,以支持最精确的模态的假设被拒绝。相反,发现双峰精度等于或超过了最好的单峰条件,视觉。研究结果对大脑所使用的潜在感觉运动过程的结构提供了一些见解,并证实了利用视觉和触觉之间自然发生的差异来更好地理解它们之间的相互作用及其对多模态感知的贡献的有用性。这些结果将有助于为未来实现触觉反馈机制的人机界面的发展提供信息。触觉定位可以有几个好处,包括增强态势感知,改善空间定向,减少工作量,从而有助于更安全的操作。这些优点可以应用于未来的飞机操纵系统,通过帮助克服视觉错觉和视觉和前庭感觉通道之间的差异,特别是在退化的视觉环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of 2D precision and accuracy for combined visual-haptic localization.

This article describes a combined visual and haptic localization experiment that addresses the area of multimodal cueing. The aim of the present investigation was to characterize two-dimensional (2D) localization precision and accuracy of visual, haptic, and combined visual-tactile targets in the peri-personal space, the space around the body in which sensory information is perceived as ecologically relevant. Participants were presented with visual, haptic, or bimodal cues using the body-centered reference frame and were instructed to indicate the corresponding perceived target location in space using a mouse pointer in an open-loop feedback condition. Outcomes of the unimodal (visual and haptic) and bimodal (combined visual-haptic) localization performance were used to assess the nature of the multisensory combination, using a Bayesian integration model. Results of the study revealed that the visual and haptic perceptive fields are characterized differently in terms of localization performance, providing important considerations for the transformation of each sensory modality when combining cues into a unified percept. The results reaffirmed many well known radial characteristics of vision with respect to localization, and identified a nonlinear pattern of haptic localization performance that was largely influenced by the midline of the center of the torso and each side of the cutaneous region. Overall, the lack of improvement in precision for bimodal cueing relative to the best unimodal cueing modality, vision, is in favor of sensory combination rather than optimal integration predicted by the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) model. Conversely, the hypothesis that accuracy in localizing the bimodal visual-haptic targets would represent a compromise between visual and haptic performance in favor of the most precise modality was rejected. Instead, the bimodal accuracy was found to be equivalent to or to exceed that of the best unimodal condition, vision. The results provide some insight into the structure of the underlying sensorimotor processes employed by the brain and confirm the usefulness of capitalizing on naturally occurring differences between vision and haptic to better understand their interaction and their contribution to multimodal perception These results will help inform the development of future human-machine interfaces implementing haptic feedback mechanisms In the context of pilot performance, haptic localization can have several benefits including enhanced situational awareness, improved spatial orientation, reduced workload, thereby contributing to safer operations. These benefits can be applied to future systems for aircraft handling by helping overcome visual illusions and discrepancies between visual and vestibular sensory channels, especially in degraded visual environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers in Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
2070
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Neural Technology is devoted to the convergence between neurobiology and quantum-, nano- and micro-sciences. In our vision, this interdisciplinary approach should go beyond the technological development of sophisticated methods and should contribute in generating a genuine change in our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信