Xudong Ni, Ziyun Wang, Xiaomeng Li, Jixinnan Sui, Weiwei Ma, Jian Pan, Dingwei Ye, Yao Zhu
{"title":"基于机器学习的NmCRPC患者转移性疾病风险模型的开发和验证:一项肿瘤标志物预后研究","authors":"Xudong Ni, Ziyun Wang, Xiaomeng Li, Jixinnan Sui, Weiwei Ma, Jian Pan, Dingwei Ye, Yao Zhu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a clinical challenge due to the high progression rate to metastasis and mortality. To date, no prognostic model has been developed to predict the metastatic probability for nmCRPC patients. In this study, we developed and externally validated a machine-learning model capable of calculating risk scores and predicting the likelihood of metastasis in nmCRPC patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 2,716 nmCRPC patients were included in this study. The training and testing datasets were derived from Clinical Trial A (The clinical trial's name and NCT number are concealed by the double-blind review policy) and Clinical Trial B, respectively. Regarding metastasis-free survival (MFS) as the endpoint, we subjected 13 clinical features to 10 machine-learning models and their combinations to predict metastasis. Model performance was assessed through accuracy (AUC), calibration (slope and intercept), and clinical utility (DCA). The risk score calculated by the model and risk factors based on eight identified variates were used for metastatic risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final prognostic model included eight prognostic factors, including novel hormone therapy (NHT) application, Gleason score, previous treatments received (both surgery and radiotherapy, or neither), Race (White), PSA doubling time (PSADT), hemoglobin (HGB), and lgPSA. The prognostic model resulted in a C-index of 0.724 (95% CI 0.700-0.747) in internal validation and relatively good performance through tAUC (>0.70 at 3-month intervals between 6 and 39 months) in external validation. In the risk score stratifying strategy, compared with the low-risk group, the metastasis HRs for medium- and high-risk groups were 1.72 (95% CI 1.39-2.12) and 4.43 (95% CI 3.66-5.38); as for risk factor count, the HRs are 1.98 (95% CI 1.50-2.61) and 4.17 (95% CI 3.16-5.52), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we developed and validated a machine learning prognostic model to predict the risk of metastasis in nmCRPC patients. This model can assist in the risk stratification of nmCRPC patients, guide follow-up strategies, and aid in selecting personalized treatment intensities.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; Prostate Cancer; Machine learning; Prognostic model; Metastasis-Free Survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk model for metastatic disease in NmCRPC patients: a tumour marker prognostic study.\",\"authors\":\"Xudong Ni, Ziyun Wang, Xiaomeng Li, Jixinnan Sui, Weiwei Ma, Jian Pan, Dingwei Ye, Yao Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a clinical challenge due to the high progression rate to metastasis and mortality. To date, no prognostic model has been developed to predict the metastatic probability for nmCRPC patients. In this study, we developed and externally validated a machine-learning model capable of calculating risk scores and predicting the likelihood of metastasis in nmCRPC patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 2,716 nmCRPC patients were included in this study. The training and testing datasets were derived from Clinical Trial A (The clinical trial's name and NCT number are concealed by the double-blind review policy) and Clinical Trial B, respectively. Regarding metastasis-free survival (MFS) as the endpoint, we subjected 13 clinical features to 10 machine-learning models and their combinations to predict metastasis. Model performance was assessed through accuracy (AUC), calibration (slope and intercept), and clinical utility (DCA). The risk score calculated by the model and risk factors based on eight identified variates were used for metastatic risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final prognostic model included eight prognostic factors, including novel hormone therapy (NHT) application, Gleason score, previous treatments received (both surgery and radiotherapy, or neither), Race (White), PSA doubling time (PSADT), hemoglobin (HGB), and lgPSA. The prognostic model resulted in a C-index of 0.724 (95% CI 0.700-0.747) in internal validation and relatively good performance through tAUC (>0.70 at 3-month intervals between 6 and 39 months) in external validation. In the risk score stratifying strategy, compared with the low-risk group, the metastasis HRs for medium- and high-risk groups were 1.72 (95% CI 1.39-2.12) and 4.43 (95% CI 3.66-5.38); as for risk factor count, the HRs are 1.98 (95% CI 1.50-2.61) and 4.17 (95% CI 3.16-5.52), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we developed and validated a machine learning prognostic model to predict the risk of metastasis in nmCRPC patients. This model can assist in the risk stratification of nmCRPC patients, guide follow-up strategies, and aid in selecting personalized treatment intensities.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; Prostate Cancer; Machine learning; Prognostic model; Metastasis-Free Survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002321\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)因其高进展转移率和死亡率而成为临床挑战。到目前为止,还没有开发出预测nmCRPC患者转移概率的预后模型。在这项研究中,我们开发并外部验证了一个机器学习模型,该模型能够计算nmCRPC患者的风险评分并预测转移的可能性。患者和方法:本研究共纳入2716例nmCRPC患者。训练和测试数据集分别来源于临床试验A(临床试验的名称和NCT编号被双盲审查政策隐藏)和临床试验B。以无转移生存期(MFS)为终点,我们对13个临床特征进行了10种机器学习模型及其组合来预测转移。通过精确度(AUC)、校准(斜率和截距)和临床效用(DCA)评估模型性能。模型计算的风险评分和基于8个确定变量的风险因素用于转移风险分层。结果:最终的预后模型包括8个预后因素,包括新激素治疗(NHT)的应用、Gleason评分、既往治疗(手术和放疗,或两者都没有)、种族(White)、PSA倍增时间(PSADT)、血红蛋白(HGB)和lgPSA。该预后模型内部验证的c -指数为0.724 (95% CI 0.700-0.747),外部验证的tAUC表现相对较好(6 - 39个月间隔3个月时为>.70)。在风险评分分层策略中,与低危组相比,中危组和高危组的转移hr分别为1.72 (95% CI 1.39 ~ 2.12)和4.43 (95% CI 3.66 ~ 5.38);危险因素数的hr分别为1.98 (95% CI 1.50 ~ 2.61)和4.17 (95% CI 3.16 ~ 5.52)。结论:在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了一种机器学习预后模型来预测nmCRPC患者的转移风险。该模型有助于nmCRPC患者的风险分层,指导随访策略,并有助于选择个性化的治疗强度。关键词:非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌;前列腺癌;机器学习;预测模型;Metastasis-Free生存。
Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk model for metastatic disease in NmCRPC patients: a tumour marker prognostic study.
Background: Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a clinical challenge due to the high progression rate to metastasis and mortality. To date, no prognostic model has been developed to predict the metastatic probability for nmCRPC patients. In this study, we developed and externally validated a machine-learning model capable of calculating risk scores and predicting the likelihood of metastasis in nmCRPC patients.
Patients and methods: A total of 2,716 nmCRPC patients were included in this study. The training and testing datasets were derived from Clinical Trial A (The clinical trial's name and NCT number are concealed by the double-blind review policy) and Clinical Trial B, respectively. Regarding metastasis-free survival (MFS) as the endpoint, we subjected 13 clinical features to 10 machine-learning models and their combinations to predict metastasis. Model performance was assessed through accuracy (AUC), calibration (slope and intercept), and clinical utility (DCA). The risk score calculated by the model and risk factors based on eight identified variates were used for metastatic risk stratification.
Results: The final prognostic model included eight prognostic factors, including novel hormone therapy (NHT) application, Gleason score, previous treatments received (both surgery and radiotherapy, or neither), Race (White), PSA doubling time (PSADT), hemoglobin (HGB), and lgPSA. The prognostic model resulted in a C-index of 0.724 (95% CI 0.700-0.747) in internal validation and relatively good performance through tAUC (>0.70 at 3-month intervals between 6 and 39 months) in external validation. In the risk score stratifying strategy, compared with the low-risk group, the metastasis HRs for medium- and high-risk groups were 1.72 (95% CI 1.39-2.12) and 4.43 (95% CI 3.66-5.38); as for risk factor count, the HRs are 1.98 (95% CI 1.50-2.61) and 4.17 (95% CI 3.16-5.52), respectively.
Conclusions: In this study, we developed and validated a machine learning prognostic model to predict the risk of metastasis in nmCRPC patients. This model can assist in the risk stratification of nmCRPC patients, guide follow-up strategies, and aid in selecting personalized treatment intensities.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.