{"title":"多发性硬化症的危险信号。","authors":"Eser Bulus, Ayse Altintas, Aksel Siva","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is often challenging and misdiagnosis remains an important contemporary problem, with considerable consequences for patients. This review aims to specify the appropriate approach in differential diagnosis of MS, highlight the clinical and paraclinical red flags and create a new perspective to the clinicians.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The accurate diagnosis of MS is challenged by a broad and heterogeneous spectrum of diseases. The differential diagnosis should be based on the combined evaluation of typical clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Studies have been recently published reported that 7.1-24.4% of patients have been misdiagnosed with MS. The most frequent correct alternative diagnoses were white matter ischemic disease and migraine.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Differential diagnosis of MS requires a holistic approach dependent on the clinical presentation and accompanied by vigilance for clinical and paraclinical red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses. Misdiagnosis could have the potential dangerous consequences for patients, including aggressive immunosuppressive therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"217-225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red flags in multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Eser Bulus, Ayse Altintas, Aksel Siva\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is often challenging and misdiagnosis remains an important contemporary problem, with considerable consequences for patients. This review aims to specify the appropriate approach in differential diagnosis of MS, highlight the clinical and paraclinical red flags and create a new perspective to the clinicians.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The accurate diagnosis of MS is challenged by a broad and heterogeneous spectrum of diseases. The differential diagnosis should be based on the combined evaluation of typical clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Studies have been recently published reported that 7.1-24.4% of patients have been misdiagnosed with MS. The most frequent correct alternative diagnoses were white matter ischemic disease and migraine.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Differential diagnosis of MS requires a holistic approach dependent on the clinical presentation and accompanied by vigilance for clinical and paraclinical red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses. Misdiagnosis could have the potential dangerous consequences for patients, including aggressive immunosuppressive therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"217-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001362\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is often challenging and misdiagnosis remains an important contemporary problem, with considerable consequences for patients. This review aims to specify the appropriate approach in differential diagnosis of MS, highlight the clinical and paraclinical red flags and create a new perspective to the clinicians.
Recent findings: The accurate diagnosis of MS is challenged by a broad and heterogeneous spectrum of diseases. The differential diagnosis should be based on the combined evaluation of typical clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Studies have been recently published reported that 7.1-24.4% of patients have been misdiagnosed with MS. The most frequent correct alternative diagnoses were white matter ischemic disease and migraine.
Summary: Differential diagnosis of MS requires a holistic approach dependent on the clinical presentation and accompanied by vigilance for clinical and paraclinical red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses. Misdiagnosis could have the potential dangerous consequences for patients, including aggressive immunosuppressive therapies.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.