治疗、药物和未满足的经济需求:2014-2020年西班牙获得精神卫生保健方面的社会经济不平等和不平等。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rosa M Urbanos-Garrido, Laura Agúndez
{"title":"治疗、药物和未满足的经济需求:2014-2020年西班牙获得精神卫生保健方面的社会经济不平等和不平等。","authors":"Rosa M Urbanos-Garrido, Laura Agúndez","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00961-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure socioeconomic-related inequality in perceived unmet needs for financial reasons for mental health care in Spain and to assess socioeconomic-related inequity in access to mental health professionals and psychotropic drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Spanish adult sample of the European Health Interview Survey for 2014 and 2020. Corrected concentration indices were used to measure socioeconomic-related inequalities in unmet needs for financial reasons and inequity in access to mental health care. Social class, based on the occupation of the breadwinner, was used as a proxy of socioeconomic status. A decomposition analysis was performed to determine the variables that explain inequalities and to identify inequity in access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unmet need for mental health care for financial reasons significantly concentrate on the worse-off, except for women in 2020. A reduction of inequality is observed along the study period. Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lower access to mental health consultations, despite also with higher need. This pro-rich inequity is significant for women in 2014, and for both sexes-although much higher for females-in 2020. In contrast, we found pro-poor inequity in women's access to psychotropic drugs in 2020, suggesting partial substitution of specialized health care with psychotropic drugs prescribed in primary care for the financially worse-off.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to accessing specialized mental health care should be reduced for those in need, particularly for disadvantaged women. A better access to therapy could also help to reduce their consumption of psychotropic drugs. Addressing access inequities requires different strategies for men and women, as the relevance of their determinants varies by gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapy, Pills and Unmet Needs for Financial Reasons: Socioeconomic Inequalities and Inequities in Access to Mental Health Care in Spain 2014-2020.\",\"authors\":\"Rosa M Urbanos-Garrido, Laura Agúndez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-025-00961-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure socioeconomic-related inequality in perceived unmet needs for financial reasons for mental health care in Spain and to assess socioeconomic-related inequity in access to mental health professionals and psychotropic drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Spanish adult sample of the European Health Interview Survey for 2014 and 2020. Corrected concentration indices were used to measure socioeconomic-related inequalities in unmet needs for financial reasons and inequity in access to mental health care. Social class, based on the occupation of the breadwinner, was used as a proxy of socioeconomic status. A decomposition analysis was performed to determine the variables that explain inequalities and to identify inequity in access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unmet need for mental health care for financial reasons significantly concentrate on the worse-off, except for women in 2020. A reduction of inequality is observed along the study period. Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lower access to mental health consultations, despite also with higher need. This pro-rich inequity is significant for women in 2014, and for both sexes-although much higher for females-in 2020. In contrast, we found pro-poor inequity in women's access to psychotropic drugs in 2020, suggesting partial substitution of specialized health care with psychotropic drugs prescribed in primary care for the financially worse-off.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers to accessing specialized mental health care should be reduced for those in need, particularly for disadvantaged women. A better access to therapy could also help to reduce their consumption of psychotropic drugs. Addressing access inequities requires different strategies for men and women, as the relevance of their determinants varies by gender.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00961-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00961-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:衡量西班牙因经济原因未满足的精神卫生保健需求方面与社会经济相关的不平等,并评估在获得精神卫生专业人员和精神药物方面与社会经济相关的不平等。方法:我们使用2014年和2020年欧洲健康访谈调查的西班牙成人样本数据。校正后的浓度指数用于衡量与社会经济相关的未满足的经济需求不平等,以及获得精神卫生保健的不平等。以养家者的职业为基础的社会阶层被用作社会经济地位的代表。进行了分解分析,以确定解释不平等的变量,并确定在获取方面的不平等。结果:2020年,由于经济原因而未满足的精神卫生保健需求主要集中在较贫困的人群中,女性除外。在整个研究期间,观察到不平等现象的减少。社会经济劣势与获得心理健康咨询的机会较少有关,尽管需求也较高。这种对富人有利的不平等在2014年对女性来说很明显,在2020年对男女都是如此——尽管女性的不平等程度要高得多。相比之下,我们发现,在2020年,妇女获得精神药物方面存在有利于穷人的不平等现象,这表明,在经济状况较差的初级保健中,专门医疗保健部分取代了精神药物处方。结论:应该为有需要的人,特别是弱势妇女减少获得专门精神保健的障碍。更好地获得治疗也有助于减少他们对精神药物的消费。解决获取不平等问题需要针对男性和女性采取不同的战略,因为其决定因素的相关性因性别而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapy, Pills and Unmet Needs for Financial Reasons: Socioeconomic Inequalities and Inequities in Access to Mental Health Care in Spain 2014-2020.

Objectives: To measure socioeconomic-related inequality in perceived unmet needs for financial reasons for mental health care in Spain and to assess socioeconomic-related inequity in access to mental health professionals and psychotropic drugs.

Methods: We used data from the Spanish adult sample of the European Health Interview Survey for 2014 and 2020. Corrected concentration indices were used to measure socioeconomic-related inequalities in unmet needs for financial reasons and inequity in access to mental health care. Social class, based on the occupation of the breadwinner, was used as a proxy of socioeconomic status. A decomposition analysis was performed to determine the variables that explain inequalities and to identify inequity in access.

Results: Unmet need for mental health care for financial reasons significantly concentrate on the worse-off, except for women in 2020. A reduction of inequality is observed along the study period. Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lower access to mental health consultations, despite also with higher need. This pro-rich inequity is significant for women in 2014, and for both sexes-although much higher for females-in 2020. In contrast, we found pro-poor inequity in women's access to psychotropic drugs in 2020, suggesting partial substitution of specialized health care with psychotropic drugs prescribed in primary care for the financially worse-off.

Conclusions: Barriers to accessing specialized mental health care should be reduced for those in need, particularly for disadvantaged women. A better access to therapy could also help to reduce their consumption of psychotropic drugs. Addressing access inequities requires different strategies for men and women, as the relevance of their determinants varies by gender.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信