Mandeep Gill Sagoo, Pak Yin Lam, Tanvi Sharma, Arisma Arora, Maheen Siddiqui, Adedeji M. Adeniyi, Cecilia Brassett, Geoffroy Noel, Richard Wingate, Sean McWatt, Dana Stearns, Pilar Garcia Souto, Anette Wu
{"title":"在跨专业医疗保健教育的全球学生合作中,通过同行评估评估群体动态:一项横跨33所大学的纵向研究。","authors":"Mandeep Gill Sagoo, Pak Yin Lam, Tanvi Sharma, Arisma Arora, Maheen Siddiqui, Adedeji M. Adeniyi, Cecilia Brassett, Geoffroy Noel, Richard Wingate, Sean McWatt, Dana Stearns, Pilar Garcia Souto, Anette Wu","doi":"10.1002/ase.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the advent of healthcare globalization, interprofessional collaboration has become increasingly important on an international scale. This longitudinal study evaluated group dynamics in the <i>International Collaboration and Exchange Program</i>, a global online program of students across 33 universities from diverse healthcare backgrounds, including medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and biomedical science. In groups of 4 to 6, participants engaged in regular discussions and projects relating to anatomy education and global health. Peer assessment was used to determine (1) whether a relationship existed between group cohesiveness and disparities in individual contribution levels and (2) whether group cohesiveness and individual contribution levels changed over time across varying group sizes. Two student cohorts were studied using the Individual Peer Assessment of Contribution methodology. Peer assessment surveys were distributed at two time points for the first (2021–2022) and second (2022–2023) cohorts, respectively, yielding 423 responses from 126 groups. Collaboration quality and effectiveness were evaluated through numerical ratings and qualitative feedback. Peer assessment is a viable tool for evaluating the dynamics of group interactions in virtual collaboration on a global scale. A reduction in group cohesiveness was associated with greater imbalances in individual contribution levels (<i>r</i> = −0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, larger groups (<i>n</i> = 6 students) demonstrated improved cohesiveness and equality in individual contribution levels over time compared to smaller groups (<i>n</i> = 4 students). This study on international healthcare student collaboration provides insights into sociocultural and educational factors impacting virtual group interactions and offers strategies for enhancing interprofessional collaborative practices in global health education.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 5","pages":"436-447"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating group dynamics through peer assessment during a global student collaboration of interprofessional healthcare education: A longitudinal study across 33 universities\",\"authors\":\"Mandeep Gill Sagoo, Pak Yin Lam, Tanvi Sharma, Arisma Arora, Maheen Siddiqui, Adedeji M. Adeniyi, Cecilia Brassett, Geoffroy Noel, Richard Wingate, Sean McWatt, Dana Stearns, Pilar Garcia Souto, Anette Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>With the advent of healthcare globalization, interprofessional collaboration has become increasingly important on an international scale. This longitudinal study evaluated group dynamics in the <i>International Collaboration and Exchange Program</i>, a global online program of students across 33 universities from diverse healthcare backgrounds, including medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and biomedical science. In groups of 4 to 6, participants engaged in regular discussions and projects relating to anatomy education and global health. Peer assessment was used to determine (1) whether a relationship existed between group cohesiveness and disparities in individual contribution levels and (2) whether group cohesiveness and individual contribution levels changed over time across varying group sizes. Two student cohorts were studied using the Individual Peer Assessment of Contribution methodology. Peer assessment surveys were distributed at two time points for the first (2021–2022) and second (2022–2023) cohorts, respectively, yielding 423 responses from 126 groups. Collaboration quality and effectiveness were evaluated through numerical ratings and qualitative feedback. Peer assessment is a viable tool for evaluating the dynamics of group interactions in virtual collaboration on a global scale. A reduction in group cohesiveness was associated with greater imbalances in individual contribution levels (<i>r</i> = −0.71, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, larger groups (<i>n</i> = 6 students) demonstrated improved cohesiveness and equality in individual contribution levels over time compared to smaller groups (<i>n</i> = 4 students). This study on international healthcare student collaboration provides insights into sociocultural and educational factors impacting virtual group interactions and offers strategies for enhancing interprofessional collaborative practices in global health education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"436-447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ase.70026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.70026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着医疗保健全球化的到来,跨专业协作在国际范围内变得越来越重要。这项纵向研究评估了国际合作与交流项目中的群体动态,该项目是一个全球性的在线项目,来自33所大学的学生来自不同的医疗保健背景,包括医学、牙科、药学和生物医学。参与者以4至6人为一组,定期讨论和开展与解剖学教育和全球健康有关的项目。采用同伴评价来确定(1)群体凝聚力与个体贡献水平差异之间是否存在关系;(2)群体凝聚力和个体贡献水平是否随时间在不同群体规模之间发生变化。使用贡献的个人同行评估方法对两个学生队列进行了研究。同行评估调查分别在第一个(2021-2022)和第二个(2022-2023)队列的两个时间点分发,从126组中获得423份回复。通过数字评级和定性反馈来评估协作的质量和有效性。同行评估是评估全球范围内虚拟协作中群体互动动态的可行工具。群体凝聚力的降低与个人贡献水平的更大不平衡有关(r = -0.71, p
Evaluating group dynamics through peer assessment during a global student collaboration of interprofessional healthcare education: A longitudinal study across 33 universities
With the advent of healthcare globalization, interprofessional collaboration has become increasingly important on an international scale. This longitudinal study evaluated group dynamics in the International Collaboration and Exchange Program, a global online program of students across 33 universities from diverse healthcare backgrounds, including medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and biomedical science. In groups of 4 to 6, participants engaged in regular discussions and projects relating to anatomy education and global health. Peer assessment was used to determine (1) whether a relationship existed between group cohesiveness and disparities in individual contribution levels and (2) whether group cohesiveness and individual contribution levels changed over time across varying group sizes. Two student cohorts were studied using the Individual Peer Assessment of Contribution methodology. Peer assessment surveys were distributed at two time points for the first (2021–2022) and second (2022–2023) cohorts, respectively, yielding 423 responses from 126 groups. Collaboration quality and effectiveness were evaluated through numerical ratings and qualitative feedback. Peer assessment is a viable tool for evaluating the dynamics of group interactions in virtual collaboration on a global scale. A reduction in group cohesiveness was associated with greater imbalances in individual contribution levels (r = −0.71, p < 0.001). Furthermore, larger groups (n = 6 students) demonstrated improved cohesiveness and equality in individual contribution levels over time compared to smaller groups (n = 4 students). This study on international healthcare student collaboration provides insights into sociocultural and educational factors impacting virtual group interactions and offers strategies for enhancing interprofessional collaborative practices in global health education.
期刊介绍:
Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.